Temporary skeletal anchorage – possibilities and mechanism of application. Literature review

G. Maziashvili, K. V. Khromenkova, N. Oborotistov, N. Y. Taranova, Kh. R. Khumgaeva, D. S. Efanova
{"title":"Temporary skeletal anchorage – possibilities and mechanism of application. Literature review","authors":"G. Maziashvili, K. V. Khromenkova, N. Oborotistov, N. Y. Taranova, Kh. R. Khumgaeva, D. S. Efanova","doi":"10.33667/2078-5631-2024-11-30-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To date, the use of a temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontic treatment in almost every clinical case. Despite this, there are only two variants of this surgical instrument: mini-screws and mini-plates. Both variants of the skeletal anchorage have their positive and negative qualities, which, to one degree or another, affect the result and timing of treatment. The purpose of this literature review is to describe the main methods of using temporary skeletal anchorage, in which clinical cases their use is possible and contraindicated, as well as what positive and negative aspects can be observed during and after the treatment of orthodontic patients. The search for scientific data was carried out in the PubMed database using such keywords as: orthodontic skeletal anchorage, temporary anchorage, orthodontic mini-screw, orthodontic mini-plate. A literature search revealed that temporary skeletal anchorage allows the surgeon and orthodontist to predictably make changes to the jaw bones that were previously only possible with orthognathic surgery. Before installing a mini-screw or mini-plate, careful planning in the form of an examination and x-ray examination should be carried out. Ultimately, informed consent should be obtained explaining to the patient that orthognathia may still be necessary if the skeletal anchorage method fails. Although this is still a relatively new technique, some issues need to be considered and further clinical research is needed.","PeriodicalId":18337,"journal":{"name":"Medical alphabet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical alphabet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-11-30-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To date, the use of a temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontic treatment in almost every clinical case. Despite this, there are only two variants of this surgical instrument: mini-screws and mini-plates. Both variants of the skeletal anchorage have their positive and negative qualities, which, to one degree or another, affect the result and timing of treatment. The purpose of this literature review is to describe the main methods of using temporary skeletal anchorage, in which clinical cases their use is possible and contraindicated, as well as what positive and negative aspects can be observed during and after the treatment of orthodontic patients. The search for scientific data was carried out in the PubMed database using such keywords as: orthodontic skeletal anchorage, temporary anchorage, orthodontic mini-screw, orthodontic mini-plate. A literature search revealed that temporary skeletal anchorage allows the surgeon and orthodontist to predictably make changes to the jaw bones that were previously only possible with orthognathic surgery. Before installing a mini-screw or mini-plate, careful planning in the form of an examination and x-ray examination should be carried out. Ultimately, informed consent should be obtained explaining to the patient that orthognathia may still be necessary if the skeletal anchorage method fails. Although this is still a relatively new technique, some issues need to be considered and further clinical research is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临时骨骼固定--应用的可能性和机制。文献综述
迄今为止,在正畸治疗中几乎每个临床病例都会使用临时骨骼固定器。尽管如此,这种手术器械只有两种变体:微型螺丝和微型板。这两种骨骼固定器都有各自的优点和缺点,它们或多或少都会影响治疗的效果和时机。这篇文献综述的目的是描述使用临时骨架固定器的主要方法,在哪些临床病例中可以使用临时骨架固定器,在哪些临床病例中禁止使用临时骨架固定器,以及在正畸患者的治疗过程中和治疗后可以观察到哪些积极和消极的方面。我们使用以下关键词在 PubMed 数据库中搜索科学数据:正畸骨骼固定器、临时固定器、正畸微型螺钉、正畸微型板。文献检索显示,临时骨骼固定允许外科医生和正畸医生对颌骨进行可预测的改变,而这在以前只有通过正颌手术才能实现。在安装微型螺钉或微型托板之前,应通过检查和X光检查进行仔细规划。最后,应征得患者的知情同意,向其解释如果骨骼固定方法失败,可能仍需进行正颌手术。尽管这仍是一项相对较新的技术,但仍有一些问题需要考虑,并需要进一步的临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kidney autotransplantation with renal arteries injury in a patient with Takayasu arteritis Osteopoikilia in the practice of a rheumatologist Современные маркеры диагностики сочетания анкилозирующего спондилита и воспалительных заболеваний кишечника Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis with eye manifestations (clinical case report) Peculiarities of laboratory parameters dynamics during helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1