Decent Work Profiles of Korean Workers: Antecedents and Outcomes of Profile Membership

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Career Assessment Pub Date : 2024-05-12 DOI:10.1177/10690727241254120
Seran Lee, Ji-Hye Kim, Ki-Hak Lee
{"title":"Decent Work Profiles of Korean Workers: Antecedents and Outcomes of Profile Membership","authors":"Seran Lee, Ji-Hye Kim, Ki-Hak Lee","doi":"10.1177/10690727241254120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research has explored profiles of decent work based on the Psychology of Working Theory. However, such investigations have rarely been attempted in Korea. This study applied latent profile analysis to discover decent work profiles and their relationships with antecedents and outcomes. Among 605 Korean workers, five distinct profiles emerged: indecent (7.9%), low safety and healthcare access (34.9%), average (38.1%), decent (13.7%), and value-dominant but low rest (5.4%). Higher subjective social status and work volition were associated with the decent work group, whereas women and individuals with less education were linked to work characterized by greater vulnerability. Furthermore, satisfaction with work needs, job, and life varied significantly across these profiles. The decent work group generally exhibited the highest satisfaction, whereas the indecent work group had the lowest. The low-safety and healthcare access work group tended to exhibit higher satisfaction levels than the indecent work group, but lower levels than the average work group. The v alue-dominant but low-rest work group exhibited life satisfaction comparable to the decent work group. The findings of this study highlight the distinctive characteristics of the working conditions in South Korea. Based on these results, we discuss theoretical and practical implications.","PeriodicalId":47978,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Career Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Career Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727241254120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research has explored profiles of decent work based on the Psychology of Working Theory. However, such investigations have rarely been attempted in Korea. This study applied latent profile analysis to discover decent work profiles and their relationships with antecedents and outcomes. Among 605 Korean workers, five distinct profiles emerged: indecent (7.9%), low safety and healthcare access (34.9%), average (38.1%), decent (13.7%), and value-dominant but low rest (5.4%). Higher subjective social status and work volition were associated with the decent work group, whereas women and individuals with less education were linked to work characterized by greater vulnerability. Furthermore, satisfaction with work needs, job, and life varied significantly across these profiles. The decent work group generally exhibited the highest satisfaction, whereas the indecent work group had the lowest. The low-safety and healthcare access work group tended to exhibit higher satisfaction levels than the indecent work group, but lower levels than the average work group. The v alue-dominant but low-rest work group exhibited life satisfaction comparable to the decent work group. The findings of this study highlight the distinctive characteristics of the working conditions in South Korea. Based on these results, we discuss theoretical and practical implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国工人体面工作档案:加入档案的前因和结果
最近的研究以工作心理学理论为基础,探讨了体面工作的概况。然而,韩国很少尝试过此类调查。本研究采用潜在特征分析来发现体面工作的特征及其与前因后果的关系。在 605 名韩国工人中,出现了五种截然不同的特征:不体面(7.9%)、低安全和医疗保健(34.9%)、一般(38.1%)、体面(13.7%)和价值主导但低休息(5.4%)。较高的主观社会地位和工作意愿与体面工作组相关,而女性和教育程度较低的个人则与脆弱性较大的工作相关。此外,这些人对工作需求、工作和生活的满意度也有很大差异。体面工作群体的满意度通常最高,而不体面工作群体的满意度最低。低安全性和医疗保健机会工作群体的满意度往往高于不体面工作群体,但低于一般工作群体。价值观占主导地位但休息时间少的工作群体的生活满意度与体面工作群体相当。本研究的结果凸显了韩国工作条件的显著特点。基于这些结果,我们讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Career Assessment
Journal of Career Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
15.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The Journal of Career Assessment publishes methodologically sound, empirically based studies focusing on the process and techniques by which counselors and others gain understanding of the individual faced with the necessity of making informed career decisions. The term career assessment, as used in this journal, covers the various techniques, tests, inventories, rating scales, interview schedules, surveys, and direct observational methods used in scientifically based practice and research to provide an improved understanding of career decision-making. The focus is not just testing, but all those means developed and used to assess and evaluate individuals and environments in the field of career counseling and development.
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of the Online Proactive Career Behavior Scale Vocational Experiences of Korean Women With a High School Diploma: Insights into Work Precarity and Social Marginalization Protean Career Orientation and Career Success: On the Roles of Proactive Career Process During the School-To-Work Transition Improving School-to-Work Transitions: Antecedents of High-Quality Intern-Supervisor Exchanges Examining the Role of Mentoring on Perceived Employability Among University Students in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1