A clinical evaluation of low-level laser therapy for pain reduction in early treatment stages: A pilot study

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE APOS Trends in Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.25259/apos_26_2024
Lavate Priyanka Akash, Pallavi B. Kamble, J. Agrawal, Shashank Vijapure, Reem A. Alansari, H. Uzunçıbuk, M. M. Marrapodi, M. Cicciù, G. Minervini
{"title":"A clinical evaluation of low-level laser therapy for pain reduction in early treatment stages: A pilot study","authors":"Lavate Priyanka Akash, Pallavi B. Kamble, J. Agrawal, Shashank Vijapure, Reem A. Alansari, H. Uzunçıbuk, M. M. Marrapodi, M. Cicciù, G. Minervini","doi":"10.25259/apos_26_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThis study aimed to clinically evaluate the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in reducing pain associated with orthodontic movement during the early stages of treatment.\n\n\n\nA randomized controlled trial was conducted with 20 participants undergoing non-extraction orthodontic treatment. The laser group (LG, n = 10) received LLLT (808 nm, 100 mW) immediately after appliance installation, while the control group (CG, n = 10) received no pain control intervention. Pain levels were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h till 7 days with an interval of 24 h. Statistical analyses included Chi-square tests and Mann–Whitney tests.\n\n\n\nThe LG consistently demonstrated significantly lower pain scores during chewing and at rest compared to the CG. After 6 h post-treatment, the median pain score on chewing in the LG was markedly lower than the CG (P < 0.001), a trend observed at each subsequent interval till 7 days. The comparison of spontaneous pain also favored the LG at various time points. Lower median VAS scores for pain on chewing among the LG and CG were zero and two, respectively, with a significant difference. The maximum median VAS scores for pain on chewing among the LG and CG were five and seven, respectively, with a significant difference.\n\n\n\nThis study provides robust evidence supporting the effectiveness of LLLT in reducing orthodontic pain during the early stages of treatment. The sustained and significant reduction in pain scores, coupled with rigorous statistical analyses, emphasizes the potential of LLLT as a valuable adjunctive therapy in orthodontic practice.\n","PeriodicalId":42593,"journal":{"name":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/apos_26_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to clinically evaluate the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in reducing pain associated with orthodontic movement during the early stages of treatment. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 20 participants undergoing non-extraction orthodontic treatment. The laser group (LG, n = 10) received LLLT (808 nm, 100 mW) immediately after appliance installation, while the control group (CG, n = 10) received no pain control intervention. Pain levels were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h till 7 days with an interval of 24 h. Statistical analyses included Chi-square tests and Mann–Whitney tests. The LG consistently demonstrated significantly lower pain scores during chewing and at rest compared to the CG. After 6 h post-treatment, the median pain score on chewing in the LG was markedly lower than the CG (P < 0.001), a trend observed at each subsequent interval till 7 days. The comparison of spontaneous pain also favored the LG at various time points. Lower median VAS scores for pain on chewing among the LG and CG were zero and two, respectively, with a significant difference. The maximum median VAS scores for pain on chewing among the LG and CG were five and seven, respectively, with a significant difference. This study provides robust evidence supporting the effectiveness of LLLT in reducing orthodontic pain during the early stages of treatment. The sustained and significant reduction in pain scores, coupled with rigorous statistical analyses, emphasizes the potential of LLLT as a valuable adjunctive therapy in orthodontic practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低强度激光疗法在早期治疗阶段减轻疼痛的临床评估:试点研究
这项研究旨在临床评估低强度激光疗法(LLLT)在减少治疗早期与正畸运动相关的疼痛方面的疗效。这项随机对照试验由 20 名接受非拔牙正畸治疗的患者参加。激光组(LG,n = 10)在安装矫治器后立即接受 LLLT(808 纳米,100 毫瓦)治疗,而对照组(CG,n = 10)则不接受疼痛控制干预。统计分析包括卡方检验(Chi-square tests)和曼-惠特尼检验(Mann-Whitney tests)。与 CG 相比,LG 在咀嚼时和休息时的疼痛评分一直明显较低。治疗后 6 小时后,LG 患者咀嚼时疼痛评分的中位数明显低于 CG 患者(P < 0.001),在随后的 7 天内,每次间隔时间都会观察到这一趋势。在不同的时间点,自发疼痛的比较也有利于 LG。LG 和 CG 的咀嚼疼痛 VAS 评分中位数分别为 0 分和 2 分,差异显著。LG 和 CG 的咀嚼疼痛 VAS 评分中位数最高分别为 5 分和 7 分,差异显著。疼痛评分的持续显著降低,再加上严谨的统计分析,强调了 LLLT 在正畸实践中作为一种有价值的辅助疗法的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
APOS Trends in Orthodontics
APOS Trends in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Comparison of coating stability and surface characterization of different esthetic NiTi arch wires – An in vivo study Accelerated and hybrid orthodontic treatment using a combination of 2D lingual appliance and in-house aligner: An anterior cross-bite and TMD case report after 1-year follow-up The perception of facial esthetics with regard to different buccal corridors and facial proportions Clinical effect of low-level laser therapy on pain perception after placement of initial orthodontic archwires Orthodontic treatment of a patient with pycnodysostosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1