Recruitment strategies for reaching adults aged 50 years and older with low socioeconomic status for participation in online physical activity interventions

Eline H. G. M. Collombon, C. Bolman, G. de Bruijn, D. Peels, Lilian Lechner
{"title":"Recruitment strategies for reaching adults aged 50 years and older with low socioeconomic status for participation in online physical activity interventions","authors":"Eline H. G. M. Collombon, C. Bolman, G. de Bruijn, D. Peels, Lilian Lechner","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1335713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generally, the health condition of those with higher socioeconomic status (SES) is better compared to those with lower SES. The application of appropriate strategies to reach low SES populations with electronic health (eHealth) interventions is thus of major importance to reduce health inequalities. eHealth-studies providing detailed information on recruitment strategies are scarce, despite the fact that this information is crucial for comparable research and implementation.To provide insight into the reach, sample characteristics and costs of three pre-planned strategies for recruiting adults aged 50 years and older with low SES for participation in an online physical activity intervention, as part of a field study.Recruitment took place via (1) invitation letters via a municipality, (2) gyms and (3) social media advertisements, aiming to include 400 participants. Additional procedures were followed to reach specifically the low SES group. Response rates, sociodemographic characteristics and costs per strategy were assessed.The highest response was shown for the municipality approach (N = 281), followed by social media (N = 71) and gyms (N = 45). Ten participants were recruited via family/friends. The most low-educated participants were reached via the municipality (N = 128) followed by social media (N = 9), gyms (N = 8) and family/friends (N = 5). Recruitment costs were with €2,142.37 the highest for the municipality compared to €96.81 for social media and no costs for gyms.Recruitment via invitation letters through a municipality has the highest potential for reaching low SES participants of the three applied strategies, although the higher recruitment costs need to be taken into account.","PeriodicalId":504480,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Digital Health","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1335713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generally, the health condition of those with higher socioeconomic status (SES) is better compared to those with lower SES. The application of appropriate strategies to reach low SES populations with electronic health (eHealth) interventions is thus of major importance to reduce health inequalities. eHealth-studies providing detailed information on recruitment strategies are scarce, despite the fact that this information is crucial for comparable research and implementation.To provide insight into the reach, sample characteristics and costs of three pre-planned strategies for recruiting adults aged 50 years and older with low SES for participation in an online physical activity intervention, as part of a field study.Recruitment took place via (1) invitation letters via a municipality, (2) gyms and (3) social media advertisements, aiming to include 400 participants. Additional procedures were followed to reach specifically the low SES group. Response rates, sociodemographic characteristics and costs per strategy were assessed.The highest response was shown for the municipality approach (N = 281), followed by social media (N = 71) and gyms (N = 45). Ten participants were recruited via family/friends. The most low-educated participants were reached via the municipality (N = 128) followed by social media (N = 9), gyms (N = 8) and family/friends (N = 5). Recruitment costs were with €2,142.37 the highest for the municipality compared to €96.81 for social media and no costs for gyms.Recruitment via invitation letters through a municipality has the highest potential for reaching low SES participants of the three applied strategies, although the higher recruitment costs need to be taken into account.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
招募 50 岁及以上社会经济地位较低的成年人参与在线体育活动干预的策略
一般来说,与社会经济地位较低的人相比,社会经济地位较高的人的健康状况较好。因此,采用适当的策略对社会经济地位较低的人群进行电子健康(eHealth)干预,对于减少健康不平等现象具有重要意义。提供有关招募策略详细信息的电子健康研究很少,尽管这些信息对于可比研究和实施至关重要。作为一项实地研究的一部分,本研究对招募 50 岁及以上、社会经济地位较低的成年人参与在线体育锻炼干预的三种预先计划的策略的覆盖范围、样本特征和成本进行了深入研究。招募方式包括:(1)通过市政府发出邀请函;(2)健身房;(3)社交媒体广告,目标是招募 400 名参与者。此外,还特别针对社会经济地位较低的群体采取了其他程序。对响应率、社会人口特征和每种策略的成本进行了评估。市政当局方法的响应率最高(281 人),其次是社交媒体(71 人)和健身房(45 人)。有 10 名参与者是通过家人/朋友招募的。通过市政当局招募到的低学历参与者最多(128 人),其次是社交媒体(9 人)、健身房(8 人)和家人/朋友(5 人)。市政当局的招募成本最高,为 2,142.37 欧元,而社交媒体的招募成本为 96.81 欧元,健身房的招募成本为零。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the design and development of a handheld electrocardiogram device in a clinical setting Analyzing the barriers and enablers to internet hospital implementation: a qualitative study of a tertiary hospital using TDF and COM-B framework Smartwatch step counting: impact on daily step-count estimation accuracy A review on over-sampling techniques in classification of multi-class imbalanced datasets: insights for medical problems The need for a refined classification system and national incident reporting system for health information technology-related incidents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1