Foreclosed Collateral as an Alternative for Bad Credit Settlement in Indonesia

Muhammad Adam Furqon, Sulistyandari Sulistyandari, Tri Prihatinah
{"title":"Foreclosed Collateral as an Alternative for Bad Credit Settlement in Indonesia","authors":"Muhammad Adam Furqon, Sulistyandari Sulistyandari, Tri Prihatinah","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.164.287692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Credit loans have the risk of not fulfilling payment obligations. Therefore it is necessary to bind collateral to get a repayment with collateral. if it cannot be anticipated anymore, then lousy credit will occur and must be resolved immediately, credit settlement usually uses the execution of mortgage rights. However, there are alternative settlements regulated in article 12 an of the law of the Republic of Indonesia number 10 of 1998 concerning banking law, namely foreclosed collateral in practice, there are problems regarding the implementation of foreclosed collateral by verdict number 183/pdt/2020/PT SMG and verdict number 24/pdt.g/2019/PN Pti. This study aimed to analyze the implementation of foreclosed collateral as a way to resolve the problem of bad loans. The research method used is normative, using secondary data obtained from library research, including primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. Therefore, the implementation of the foreclosed collateral taken over by verdict Number 183/PDT/2020/PT Smg is valid because it is through a voluntary submission mechanism, and verdict Number 24/Pdt.G/2019/PN Pti is invalid because there is no agreement and has an impact on debtors and creditors feel harmed.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":" 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.164.287692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Credit loans have the risk of not fulfilling payment obligations. Therefore it is necessary to bind collateral to get a repayment with collateral. if it cannot be anticipated anymore, then lousy credit will occur and must be resolved immediately, credit settlement usually uses the execution of mortgage rights. However, there are alternative settlements regulated in article 12 an of the law of the Republic of Indonesia number 10 of 1998 concerning banking law, namely foreclosed collateral in practice, there are problems regarding the implementation of foreclosed collateral by verdict number 183/pdt/2020/PT SMG and verdict number 24/pdt.g/2019/PN Pti. This study aimed to analyze the implementation of foreclosed collateral as a way to resolve the problem of bad loans. The research method used is normative, using secondary data obtained from library research, including primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. Therefore, the implementation of the foreclosed collateral taken over by verdict Number 183/PDT/2020/PT Smg is valid because it is through a voluntary submission mechanism, and verdict Number 24/Pdt.G/2019/PN Pti is invalid because there is no agreement and has an impact on debtors and creditors feel harmed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚将取消抵押品赎回权作为解决不良信贷的替代办法
信用贷款有不履行付款义务的风险。因此,有必要对抵押品进行约束,以获得有抵押品的还款。如果无法预期,就会出现不良信贷,必须立即解决,信贷结算通常采用执行抵押权的方式。然而,印度尼西亚共和国 1998 年第 10 号关于银行法的法律第 12 条也规定了其他结算方式,即取消抵押品赎回权。在实践中,第 183/pdt/2020/PT SMG 号判决和第 24/pdt.g/2019/PN Pti 号判决在取消抵押品赎回权的执行方面存在问题。本研究旨在分析取消抵押品赎回权作为解决不良贷款问题的一种方式的实施情况。所采用的研究方法是规范性的,使用从图书馆研究中获得的二手数据,包括一级、二级和三级法律来源。因此,第183/PDT/2020/PT Smg号判决所采取的取消抵押品赎回权的实施是有效的,因为它是通过自愿提交机制进行的,而第24/Pdt.G/2019/PN Pti号判决是无效的,因为它没有协议,对债务人有影响,债权人感到受到伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of legal regulation of exemptions in the payment and calculation of land fees in the conditions of martial law on the basis of judicial practice Ways to Protect Infringed Rights in the Creation and Distribution of Deepfakes Creation and Legal Status of a Specially Authorized Body of Non-Banking Financial Services Implementation of the Ecosystem Services Concept in the Environmental Legislation of Ukraine: Current State and Prospects Modern Challenges of Adjusting the Effectiveness of the Application of Laws (on the Example of Tax and Legal Regulation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1