EXPRESS: To Hinder or to Facilitate: Retailers’ Strategy of Consumer Information Sharing

IF 4.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Production and Operations Management Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1177/10591478241256662
Buqing Ma, Guang Li, Guangwen Kong
{"title":"EXPRESS: To Hinder or to Facilitate: Retailers’ Strategy of Consumer Information Sharing","authors":"Buqing Ma, Guang Li, Guangwen Kong","doi":"10.1177/10591478241256662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consumer information sharing is considered an effective strategy to attract consumers, yet certain high-end retailers, such as Bergdorf Goodman and Farfetch, tend to hinder consumers from sharing information through online reviews. We study a retailer’s strategy for consumer information sharing in a supply chain. We find that a retailer’s information sharing strategy can prevent manufacturers from extracting excessive profit when consumers are heterogeneous in their valuations of the selling product. Specifically, a retailer can achieve a higher profit margin by targeting all consumer segments. By strategically choosing the information sharing strategy to influence consumer beliefs, the retailer can induce the manufacturer to conform to the retailer’s preferred targeting segment through a low wholesale price. Thus, a high-end retailer, whose consumers have a high ex-ante quality belief, favors hindering information sharing among consumers because it enables the retailer to target all consumer segments. Interestingly, deterring consumers from learning about the product quality may generate more consumer surplus. Our main results are robust under extensions such as consumer search behavior, consumer waiting, and multiple product selling. When selling multiple products, a retailer with a large quality variation is better off hindering consumers from sharing information. Our work shows that strategically choosing a consumer information sharing strategy enables retailers to enhance profit margins in their interactions with upstream manufacturers.","PeriodicalId":20623,"journal":{"name":"Production and Operations Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production and Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241256662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumer information sharing is considered an effective strategy to attract consumers, yet certain high-end retailers, such as Bergdorf Goodman and Farfetch, tend to hinder consumers from sharing information through online reviews. We study a retailer’s strategy for consumer information sharing in a supply chain. We find that a retailer’s information sharing strategy can prevent manufacturers from extracting excessive profit when consumers are heterogeneous in their valuations of the selling product. Specifically, a retailer can achieve a higher profit margin by targeting all consumer segments. By strategically choosing the information sharing strategy to influence consumer beliefs, the retailer can induce the manufacturer to conform to the retailer’s preferred targeting segment through a low wholesale price. Thus, a high-end retailer, whose consumers have a high ex-ante quality belief, favors hindering information sharing among consumers because it enables the retailer to target all consumer segments. Interestingly, deterring consumers from learning about the product quality may generate more consumer surplus. Our main results are robust under extensions such as consumer search behavior, consumer waiting, and multiple product selling. When selling multiple products, a retailer with a large quality variation is better off hindering consumers from sharing information. Our work shows that strategically choosing a consumer information sharing strategy enables retailers to enhance profit margins in their interactions with upstream manufacturers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快递:是阻碍还是促进?零售商共享消费者信息的策略
消费者信息共享被认为是吸引消费者的有效策略,但某些高端零售商,如 Bergdorf Goodman 和 Farfetch,往往会阻碍消费者通过在线评论共享信息。我们研究了零售商在供应链中的消费者信息共享策略。我们发现,当消费者对销售产品的评价存在异质性时,零售商的信息共享策略可以防止制造商攫取过多利润。具体来说,零售商可以通过针对所有消费者群体获得更高的利润率。通过战略性地选择信息共享策略来影响消费者的信念,零售商可以通过低批发价诱使制造商符合零售商偏好的目标细分市场。因此,高端零售商(其消费者事前对质量有较高的信念)倾向于阻碍消费者之间的信息共享,因为这能使零售商瞄准所有的消费群体。有趣的是,阻止消费者了解产品质量可能会产生更多的消费者剩余。我们的主要结果在消费者搜索行为、消费者等待和多产品销售等扩展情况下都是稳健的。在销售多种产品时,质量差异较大的零售商最好阻止消费者分享信息。我们的研究表明,战略性地选择消费者信息共享策略能使零售商在与上游制造商的互动中提高利润率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Production and Operations Management
Production and Operations Management 管理科学-工程:制造
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.00%
发文量
278
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Production and Operations Management is to serve as the flagship research journal in operations management in manufacturing and services. The journal publishes scientific research into the problems, interest, and concerns of managers who manage product and process design, operations, and supply chains. It covers all topics in product and process design, operations, and supply chain management and welcomes papers using any research paradigm.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Constrained Assortment Optimization under the Cross-Nested Logit Model EXPRESS: Influencing Primary Care Antibiotic Prescription Behavior Using Financial Incentives EXPRESS: Fairness as a Robust Utilitarianism EXPRESS: Financing and Farm-gate Pricing Strategies for Agricultural Cooperatives with Cash-constrained Farmers EXPRESS: Consumer Social Connectedness and Persuasiveness of Collaborative-Filtering Recommender Systems: Evidence from an Online-to-Offline Recommendation App
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1