Academic register anxiety? – How language ideologies influence university students’ oral participation

IF 0.8 Q3 LINGUISTICS European Journal of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1515/eujal-2024-0003
Esther Jahns
{"title":"Academic register anxiety? – How language ideologies influence university students’ oral participation","authors":"Esther Jahns","doi":"10.1515/eujal-2024-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper deals with the registers of spoken language in university classes, their prestige, and the language ideologies linked to them. I will show that, due to these ideologies, the academic registers can trigger strong emotions that hinder oral participation. Previous research on language anxiety has revealed that formal situations are an important trigger. Therefore, the academic context is an interesting research site for language or register anxiety, as it offers a range of highly formal communicative situations. Academic language can be conceptualized as a set of distinctive registers that must be acquired by students. However, it is seldom made explicit which linguistic competences are expected and that their acquisition is a process. This might trigger feelings of anxiety in the classroom, especially for students who perceive themselves as not mastering these registers or who have already experienced unbelonging or exclusion due to their linguistic repertoire. Based on qualitative interviews with students from a German university, I will show that proficiency in the academic registers is often perceived as competence and knowledge in the respective discipline. This ideology together with other factors can lead to less or no oral participation in class.","PeriodicalId":43181,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2024-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper deals with the registers of spoken language in university classes, their prestige, and the language ideologies linked to them. I will show that, due to these ideologies, the academic registers can trigger strong emotions that hinder oral participation. Previous research on language anxiety has revealed that formal situations are an important trigger. Therefore, the academic context is an interesting research site for language or register anxiety, as it offers a range of highly formal communicative situations. Academic language can be conceptualized as a set of distinctive registers that must be acquired by students. However, it is seldom made explicit which linguistic competences are expected and that their acquisition is a process. This might trigger feelings of anxiety in the classroom, especially for students who perceive themselves as not mastering these registers or who have already experienced unbelonging or exclusion due to their linguistic repertoire. Based on qualitative interviews with students from a German university, I will show that proficiency in the academic registers is often perceived as competence and knowledge in the respective discipline. This ideology together with other factors can lead to less or no oral participation in class.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术注册焦虑?- 语言意识形态如何影响大学生的口语参与
本文论述了大学课堂中的口语语域、其声望以及与之相关的语言意识形态。我将说明,由于这些意识形态,学术语域会引发强烈的情绪,从而阻碍口语参与。以往关于语言焦虑的研究表明,正式场合是一个重要的诱因。因此,学术语境是语言焦虑或语域焦虑的一个有趣的研究场所,因为它提供了一系列高度正式的交际情境。学术语言可以概念化为学生必须掌握的一套独特的语域。然而,我们很少明确指出哪些语言能力是我们所期望的,而且这些能力的习得需要一个过程。这可能会在课堂上引发学生的焦虑感,尤其是那些认为自己没有掌握这些语域,或者已经因为自己的语域而经历过不被接纳或排斥的学生。根据对一所德国大学学生的定性访谈,我将说明,熟练掌握学术语域通常被视为具有相应学科的能力和知识。这种意识形态加上其他因素,会导致学生在课堂上较少或根本没有口头参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
What does linguistic structure tell us about language ideologies? Academic register anxiety? – How language ideologies influence university students’ oral participation Whose language counts? Playback interviews as a method for research on language ideologies: Citationality, reflexivity, and rapport in interdiscursive encounters Epilogue: The traces and tracings of language ideologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1