Evaluating Existing Ocean Glider Sampling Strategies for Submesoscale Dynamics

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, OCEAN Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1175/jtech-d-23-0055.1
Ryan D. Patmore, David Ferreira, David P. Marshall, M. D. du Plessis, J. Brearley, Sebastiaan Swart
{"title":"Evaluating Existing Ocean Glider Sampling Strategies for Submesoscale Dynamics","authors":"Ryan D. Patmore, David Ferreira, David P. Marshall, M. D. du Plessis, J. Brearley, Sebastiaan Swart","doi":"10.1175/jtech-d-23-0055.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nMixing in the upper ocean is important for biological production and the transfer of heat and carbon between the atmosphere and deep ocean, properties commonly targeted by observational campaigns using ocean gliders. We assess the reliability of ocean gliders to obtain a robust statistical representation of submesocale variability in the ocean mixed layer of the Weddell Sea. A 1/48° regional simulation of the Southern Ocean is sampled with virtual ‘bow-tie’ glider deployments, which are then compared against the reference model output. Sampling biases of lateral buoyancy gradients associated with the arbitrary alignment between glider paths and fronts are formally quantified, and the magnitude of the biases are comparable to observational estimates, with a mean error of 52%. The sampling bias leaves errors in the retrieved distribution of buoyancy gradients largely insensitive to deployment length and the deployment of additional gliders. Notable sensitivity to these choices emerges when the biases are removed by sampling perpendicular to fronts at all times. Detecting seasonal change in the magnitude of buoyancy gradients is sensitive to the glider-orientation sampling bias but the change in variance is not. We evaluate the impact of reducing the number of dives and climbs in an observational campaign and find small reductions in the number of dive-climb pairs have a limited effect on the results. Lastly, examining the sensitivity of the sampling bias to path orientation indicates the bias is not dependent on the direction of travel, in our deep ocean study site.","PeriodicalId":15074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-23-0055.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mixing in the upper ocean is important for biological production and the transfer of heat and carbon between the atmosphere and deep ocean, properties commonly targeted by observational campaigns using ocean gliders. We assess the reliability of ocean gliders to obtain a robust statistical representation of submesocale variability in the ocean mixed layer of the Weddell Sea. A 1/48° regional simulation of the Southern Ocean is sampled with virtual ‘bow-tie’ glider deployments, which are then compared against the reference model output. Sampling biases of lateral buoyancy gradients associated with the arbitrary alignment between glider paths and fronts are formally quantified, and the magnitude of the biases are comparable to observational estimates, with a mean error of 52%. The sampling bias leaves errors in the retrieved distribution of buoyancy gradients largely insensitive to deployment length and the deployment of additional gliders. Notable sensitivity to these choices emerges when the biases are removed by sampling perpendicular to fronts at all times. Detecting seasonal change in the magnitude of buoyancy gradients is sensitive to the glider-orientation sampling bias but the change in variance is not. We evaluate the impact of reducing the number of dives and climbs in an observational campaign and find small reductions in the number of dive-climb pairs have a limited effect on the results. Lastly, examining the sensitivity of the sampling bias to path orientation indicates the bias is not dependent on the direction of travel, in our deep ocean study site.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估现有海洋滑翔机对亚主题尺度动态的采样策略
海洋上层的混合层对生物生产以及大气与深海之间的热量和碳的传输非常重要,这些特性通常是使用海洋滑翔机进行观测活动的目标。我们评估了海洋滑翔机在获得威德尔海海洋混合层亚尺度变异性的稳健统计表示方面的可靠性。利用虚拟 "领结式 "滑翔机布放对南大洋 1/48° 区域模拟进行采样,然后与参考模式输出进行比较。与滑翔机路径和锋面之间的任意对齐有关的横向浮力梯度采样偏差被正式量化,偏差的大小与观测估计值相当,平均误差为 52%。采样偏差使得浮力梯度分布的误差对布放长度和布放额外的滑翔机基本不敏感。如果在任何时候都垂直于锋面取样,就可以消除这些偏差。检测浮力梯度大小的季节性变化对滑翔机取样方向的偏差很敏感,但对方差的变化则不敏感。我们评估了在观测活动中减少下潜和爬升次数的影响,发现下潜和爬升次数的少量减少对观测结果的影响有限。最后,研究了取样偏差对路径方向的敏感性,结果表明在我们的深海研究地点,取样偏差与行进方向无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology (JTECH) publishes research describing instrumentation and methods used in atmospheric and oceanic research, including remote sensing instruments; measurements, validation, and data analysis techniques from satellites, aircraft, balloons, and surface-based platforms; in situ instruments, measurements, and methods for data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation and assimilation in numerical models; and information systems and algorithms.
期刊最新文献
Ocean wave directional distribution from GPS buoy observations off the west coast of Ireland: Assessment of a wavelet-based method Validation of Doppler Wind LiDAR measurements with an Uncrewed Aerial System (UAS) in the daytime atmospheric boundary layer Using the GEOS 5 Nature Run to Simulate 2053 nm Coherent Doppler Wind Lidar Observations A Flexible, Multi-Instrument Optimal Estimation Retrieval for Wind Profiles Accuracy of polarimetric radar ZDR estimates: Implications for the quantitative observation of meteorological and non-meteorological echoes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1