Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for people with both COPD and frailty starting pulmonary rehabilitation: a mixed-methods feasibility trial

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00774-2023
Lisa Jane Brighton, Catherine J. Evans, Morag Farquhar, K. Bristowe, Aleksandra Kata, Jade Higman, Margaret Ogden, C. Nolan, Deokhee Yi, Wei Gao, M. Koulopoulou, Sharmeen Hasan, Karen Ingram, Stuart F. Clarke, Kishan Parmar, Eleni Baldwin, C. Steves, William D-C Man, Matthew Maddocks
{"title":"Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for people with both COPD and frailty starting pulmonary rehabilitation: a mixed-methods feasibility trial","authors":"Lisa Jane Brighton, Catherine J. Evans, Morag Farquhar, K. Bristowe, Aleksandra Kata, Jade Higman, Margaret Ogden, C. Nolan, Deokhee Yi, Wei Gao, M. Koulopoulou, Sharmeen Hasan, Karen Ingram, Stuart F. Clarke, Kishan Parmar, Eleni Baldwin, C. Steves, William D-C Man, Matthew Maddocks","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00774-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many people with COPD experience frailty. Frailty increases risk of poor health outcomes, including non-completion of pulmonary rehabilitation. Integrated approaches to support people with COPD and frailty throughout and following rehabilitation are indicated.To determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of integrating comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for people with COPD and frailty starting pulmonary rehabilitation.Multicentre mixed-methods randomised controlled feasibility trial (“Breathe Plus”;ISRCTN13051922). People with COPD, aged ≥50, Clinical Frailty Scale ≥5, and referred for pulmonary rehabilitation were randomised 1:1 to usual pulmonary rehabilitation, or pulmonary rehabilitation plus CGA. Remote intervention delivery was used during Covid-19 restrictions. Outcomes (physical, psycho-social, service use) were measured at baseline, 90 and 180 days, alongside process data and qualitative interviews.Recruitment stopped at 31 participants (mean age 72.4 [sd10.1], 68% MRC 4–5), due to Covid-19-related disruptions. Recruitment (46% eligible recruited) and retention (87% at 90- and 180-day follow-up) were acceptable. CGAs occurred on average 60.5 days post-randomisation (range 8–129) and prompted 46 individual care recommendations (median 3 per participant, range 0–12); 65% of which were implemented during follow-up. The most common domains addressed during CGA were nutrition and cardiovascular health. Participants valued the holistic approach of CGA but questioned the optimal time to introduce it.Integrating CGA alongside pulmonary rehabilitation is feasible and identifies unmet multidimensional need in people with COPD and frailty. Given challenges around timing and inclusivity, the integration of geriatric and respiratory care should not be limited to rehabilitation services.","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00774-2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many people with COPD experience frailty. Frailty increases risk of poor health outcomes, including non-completion of pulmonary rehabilitation. Integrated approaches to support people with COPD and frailty throughout and following rehabilitation are indicated.To determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of integrating comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for people with COPD and frailty starting pulmonary rehabilitation.Multicentre mixed-methods randomised controlled feasibility trial (“Breathe Plus”;ISRCTN13051922). People with COPD, aged ≥50, Clinical Frailty Scale ≥5, and referred for pulmonary rehabilitation were randomised 1:1 to usual pulmonary rehabilitation, or pulmonary rehabilitation plus CGA. Remote intervention delivery was used during Covid-19 restrictions. Outcomes (physical, psycho-social, service use) were measured at baseline, 90 and 180 days, alongside process data and qualitative interviews.Recruitment stopped at 31 participants (mean age 72.4 [sd10.1], 68% MRC 4–5), due to Covid-19-related disruptions. Recruitment (46% eligible recruited) and retention (87% at 90- and 180-day follow-up) were acceptable. CGAs occurred on average 60.5 days post-randomisation (range 8–129) and prompted 46 individual care recommendations (median 3 per participant, range 0–12); 65% of which were implemented during follow-up. The most common domains addressed during CGA were nutrition and cardiovascular health. Participants valued the holistic approach of CGA but questioned the optimal time to introduce it.Integrating CGA alongside pulmonary rehabilitation is feasible and identifies unmet multidimensional need in people with COPD and frailty. Given challenges around timing and inclusivity, the integration of geriatric and respiratory care should not be limited to rehabilitation services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为同时患有慢性阻塞性肺病和体弱的患者进行肺康复综合老年评估:混合方法可行性试验
许多慢性阻塞性肺病患者都有体弱的经历。体弱会增加不良健康后果的风险,包括无法完成肺康复治疗。多中心混合方法随机对照可行性试验("Breathe Plus";ISRCTN13051922)。患有慢性阻塞性肺病、年龄≥50岁、临床虚弱量表≥5分并转诊至肺康复中心的患者按1:1比例随机分配至常规肺康复或肺康复加CGA。在Covid-19限制期间采用远程干预。由于与 Covid-19 相关的干扰,招募工作在 31 名参与者(平均年龄 72.4 [sd10.1],68% MRC 4-5)时停止。招募率(46%符合招募条件)和保留率(90 天和 180 天随访时为 87%)均可接受。CGA 平均在随机化后 60.5 天进行(范围为 8-129),提出了 46 项个人护理建议(中位数为每位参与者 3 项,范围为 0-12);其中 65% 的建议在随访期间得到了实施。CGA 期间最常涉及的领域是营养和心血管健康。将 CGA 与肺康复结合起来是可行的,并能确定慢性阻塞性肺病和体弱患者尚未满足的多方面需求。鉴于时机和包容性方面的挑战,老年医学和呼吸系统护理的整合不应仅限于康复服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
期刊最新文献
Assessing post-COVID-19 respiratory dynamics: a comprehensive analysis of pulmonary function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and bronchodilator response. Cognitive interference of respiratory versus limb muscle dual tasking in healthy adults. Corticosteroid therapy in fibrotic interstitial lung disease: a modified Delphi survey. Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for post-sepsis frailty. High-flow humidified oxygen as an early intervention in children with acute severe asthma: a feasibility randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1