Blood Pressure: The History and Development of Monitoring Modalities

Desiree M. Cihelka
{"title":"Blood Pressure: The History and Development of Monitoring Modalities","authors":"Desiree M. Cihelka","doi":"10.59236/sc.v1i2.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background \nBlood pressure (BP) is one of the most frequently measured and monitored physiologic vital signs by all stroke clinicians, yet data suggest that only 1 out of 5 clinicians applies evidence-based methods for BP monitoring.  \nMethods \nAn exhaustive review of the literature was conducted and assembled to provide a historical clinical account of BP monitoring modalities and related evidence-based clinical methods. \nResults \nEvidence-based clinical methods are described for use of manual sphygmomanometry, noninvasive oscillometric automatic BP (NIBP) monitors, and arterial lines.  Implications for practice are discussed in relation to provision of acute and critical care of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients. \nConclusion \nUse of evidence-based BP monitoring methods ensures accurate management of highly vulnerable stroke patients. Knowledge of the history of BP monitoring, along with the benefits and limitations of different measurement methods enables accuracy in BP treatment, benefitting stroke patient outcomes.  ","PeriodicalId":517115,"journal":{"name":"Stroke Clinician","volume":" 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke Clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59236/sc.v1i2.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Blood pressure (BP) is one of the most frequently measured and monitored physiologic vital signs by all stroke clinicians, yet data suggest that only 1 out of 5 clinicians applies evidence-based methods for BP monitoring.  Methods An exhaustive review of the literature was conducted and assembled to provide a historical clinical account of BP monitoring modalities and related evidence-based clinical methods. Results Evidence-based clinical methods are described for use of manual sphygmomanometry, noninvasive oscillometric automatic BP (NIBP) monitors, and arterial lines.  Implications for practice are discussed in relation to provision of acute and critical care of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients. Conclusion Use of evidence-based BP monitoring methods ensures accurate management of highly vulnerable stroke patients. Knowledge of the history of BP monitoring, along with the benefits and limitations of different measurement methods enables accuracy in BP treatment, benefitting stroke patient outcomes.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血压:监测模式的历史与发展
背景 血压(BP)是所有卒中临床医生最常测量和监测的生理生命体征之一,但数据显示,每 5 位临床医生中只有 1 位采用循证方法进行血压监测。 方法 对文献进行了详尽的综述,以提供血压监测模式和相关循证临床方法的历史性临床描述。结果 介绍了使用手动血压计、无创示波自动血压计 (NIBP) 和动脉导管的循证临床方法。 讨论了为缺血性和出血性卒中患者提供急危重症护理的实践意义。结论 使用循证血压监测方法可确保对高度脆弱的卒中患者进行准确管理。了解血压监测的历史以及不同测量方法的益处和局限性可确保血压治疗的准确性,从而改善中风患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of a Telemedicine-Based Principal Illness Navigation (PIN) Service for Complex Populations Following Hospital Discharge After Acute Stroke Development and Implementation of a Stroke Nurse Navigator Position to Improve Program and Patient Outcomes In Our Stroke Unit A Drive Interrupted: Stroke of the Anterior Choroidal Artery – A Case Report BRAVEST: A Visual Teaching Aid for Stroke Clinicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1