Living Together Apart: Size and Significance of Co-Residency Following Relationship Breakdown in Contemporary Britain

Simon Duncan, Jenny van Hooff, Julia Carter
{"title":"Living Together Apart: Size and Significance of Co-Residency Following Relationship Breakdown in Contemporary Britain","authors":"Simon Duncan, Jenny van Hooff, Julia Carter","doi":"10.1177/13607804241246411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we seek to establish the importance of living together apart (LTA), where ex-partners continue to co-reside following relationship breakdown. Although LTA is commonplace, it has been almost completely overlooked by family sociology and social policy. Because LTA is conceptually unrecognised, there is little empirical information and because there is so little information, it remains conceptually unrecognised. In this article, we attempt to break out from this loop. First, we place LTA within the context of partnership change. Second, we estimate the quantitative magnitude and qualitative significance of LTA in Britain. We use a survey concerned with owner-occupier LTA to indicate population characteristics and aggregate behaviour. This is accompanied by qualitative analysis of Mumsnet forums on LTA, to develop insight into understandings and relationships. Drawing on these findings, we argue that LTA is both a significant household form and important relationship type.","PeriodicalId":509355,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Research Online","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Research Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804241246411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we seek to establish the importance of living together apart (LTA), where ex-partners continue to co-reside following relationship breakdown. Although LTA is commonplace, it has been almost completely overlooked by family sociology and social policy. Because LTA is conceptually unrecognised, there is little empirical information and because there is so little information, it remains conceptually unrecognised. In this article, we attempt to break out from this loop. First, we place LTA within the context of partnership change. Second, we estimate the quantitative magnitude and qualitative significance of LTA in Britain. We use a survey concerned with owner-occupier LTA to indicate population characteristics and aggregate behaviour. This is accompanied by qualitative analysis of Mumsnet forums on LTA, to develop insight into understandings and relationships. Drawing on these findings, we argue that LTA is both a significant household form and important relationship type.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分居生活:当代英国关系破裂后共同居住的规模和意义
在本文中,我们试图确定分居生活(LTA)的重要性,即前伴侣在关系破裂后继续共同居住。虽然分居生活很常见,但家庭社会学和社会政策几乎完全忽视了它。由于 LTA 在概念上未得到认可,因此实证资料很少,而由于资料很少,它在概念上仍未得到认可。在本文中,我们试图打破这一怪圈。首先,我们将长期协议置于伙伴关系变化的背景下。其次,我们估算了英国长期协议的数量规模和质量意义。我们利用一项关于自住者长期租赁协议的调查来说明人口特征和总体行为。与此同时,我们还对有关长期协议的妈妈网论坛进行了定性分析,以深入了解各种理解和关系。根据这些调查结果,我们认为长期租赁协议既是一种重要的家庭形式,也是一种重要的关系类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-Heteronormative Reproductive Tactics in Poland Collectivist Relationality and Individualistic Relationality: Pacific Mothers and Fathers Negotiating Agency and Identity in Post–Separation Care Arrangements for Children Rethinking Veganism in the Digital Age. Innovating Methodology and Typology to Explore a Decade of Facebook Discourses Beyond Local Domains: Connective Ontology in (Post-)Cognitive Sociology The Self in Self-Help: A Re-Appraisal of Therapeutic Culture in a Time of Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1