THE HOUSING-WELFARE REGIME AND THIRD-SECTOR HOUSING IN HONG KONG AND SOUTH KOREA: A Historical Institutionalist Perspective

IF 2.7 2区 经济学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY International Journal of Urban and Regional Research Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1111/1468-2427.13231
Bo Kyong Seo, Dayoon Kim
{"title":"THE HOUSING-WELFARE REGIME AND THIRD-SECTOR HOUSING IN HONG KONG AND SOUTH KOREA: A Historical Institutionalist Perspective","authors":"Bo Kyong Seo,&nbsp;Dayoon Kim","doi":"10.1111/1468-2427.13231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The third sector has recently emerged, or re-emerged, as a new housing provider for disadvantaged groups in Hong Kong and Korea, where affordable housing development has been predominantly directed by government. However, our knowledge of third-sector housing in non-Western contexts remains partial. In this article, we aim to provide, from a historical-institutionalist perspective, a comparative account of the (re-)emergence and implementation of third-sector affordable housing delivery in Hong Kong and Korea. Based on the housing-welfare regime framework, we discuss the socioeconomic and political contexts in which third-sector housing has burgeoned in the two regions, and how the relationship between the government and the third sector has moulded the implementation of third-sector housing. We highlight the significant power of the government in implementing third-sector housing and third-sector organizations’ continued complementary role to the government in supplying housing as welfare, which reflects the path-dependent nature of housing and welfare policies in the two regions. Adopting a long view to understanding history and a broader framework that reflects the socioeconomic context contributes to advancing the comparative housing literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":14327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2427.13231","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The third sector has recently emerged, or re-emerged, as a new housing provider for disadvantaged groups in Hong Kong and Korea, where affordable housing development has been predominantly directed by government. However, our knowledge of third-sector housing in non-Western contexts remains partial. In this article, we aim to provide, from a historical-institutionalist perspective, a comparative account of the (re-)emergence and implementation of third-sector affordable housing delivery in Hong Kong and Korea. Based on the housing-welfare regime framework, we discuss the socioeconomic and political contexts in which third-sector housing has burgeoned in the two regions, and how the relationship between the government and the third sector has moulded the implementation of third-sector housing. We highlight the significant power of the government in implementing third-sector housing and third-sector organizations’ continued complementary role to the government in supplying housing as welfare, which reflects the path-dependent nature of housing and welfare policies in the two regions. Adopting a long view to understanding history and a broader framework that reflects the socioeconomic context contributes to advancing the comparative housing literature.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
香港和韩国的住房福利制度与第三部分住房:历史制度主义视角
在经济适用房开发主要由政府指导的香港和韩国,第三部门最近出现或重新出现,成为弱势群体的新住房提供者。然而,我们对非西方国家第三部门住房的了解仍然很片面。在本文中,我们旨在从历史-制度主义的角度,对香港和韩国第三部门经济适用房的(重新)出现和实施进行比较研究。基于住房-福利制度框架,我们讨论了第三部门住房在这两个地区兴起的社会经济和政治背景,以及政府和第三部门之间的关系如何塑造了第三部门住房的实施。我们强调了政府在实施第三部门住房方面的重要权力,以及第三部门组织在作为福利提供住房方面对政府的持续补充作用,这反映了两地住房和福利政策的路径依赖性质。采用长远的眼光来理解历史,并采用反映社会经济背景的更广泛的框架,有助于推动比较住房文献的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: A groundbreaking forum for intellectual debate, IJURR is at the forefront of urban and regional research. With a cutting edge approach to linking theoretical development and empirical research, and a consistent demand for quality, IJURR encompasses key material from an unparalleled range of critical, comparative and geographic perspectives. Embracing a multidisciplinary approach to the field, IJURR is essential reading for social scientists with a concern for the complex, changing roles and futures of cities and regions.
期刊最新文献
Cover Image Issue Information CLASS AT THE CROSSROADS: Reframing Disadvantage in Organizing Daily Wage Work in Western India THE POLITICS OF VIOLENT CONCATENATIONS ‘SANCTUARY FOR ALL’ OR ‘SANCTUARY FOR THE DESERVING’: How Municipal Bureaucracies Mediate and Decide Contentious Struggles over Urban Citizenship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1