The effect of intraoperative low-dose ketamine versus dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative bowel recovery in patients undergoing gastrointestinal malignancy surgeries: Placebo-controlled, randomized trial

Sabari K. Kumar, Satyajeet Misra, B. Behera, Neha Singh, D. Muduly, Anand Srinivasan
{"title":"The effect of intraoperative low-dose ketamine versus dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative bowel recovery in patients undergoing gastrointestinal malignancy surgeries: Placebo-controlled, randomized trial","authors":"Sabari K. Kumar, Satyajeet Misra, B. Behera, Neha Singh, D. Muduly, Anand Srinivasan","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_322_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n No studies have compared the effects of ketamine and dexmedetomidine on bowel recovery. We evaluated the effects of intraoperative low-dose ketamine or dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative bowel recovery in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy surgeries.\n \n \n \n This placebo-controlled, randomized study was carried out in 84 American Society of Anesthesiologists II patients, aged 18–70 years, of either gender, undergoing elective open GI malignancy surgeries. Patients received intraoperative infusion of ketamine @ 0.1 mg kg-1 h-1 (KET), dexmedetomidine @ 0.25 μg kg-1 h-1 (DEX), or normal saline (placebo). Primary outcome was the time to first flatus and/or stool. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation, total analgesic requirement, postoperative pain scores, time to feeds, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and the incidence of adverse events. Continuous data were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal–Wallis test. Categorical data were analyzed by the Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test.\n \n \n \n Median time to passage of flatus and/or stool was 3 [interquartile range (IQR) 2–3] days in the KET group, 2 [IQR 2–3] days in the DEX group, and 2 [IQR 2–3] days in the placebo group (P = 0.53 for placebo vs. KET, 0.81 for placebo vs. DEX, and 0.99 for KET vs. DEX). Pain scores and analgesic consumption were significantly less in the intervention groups versus placebo (P < 0.001). No difference was seen in other secondary outcomes.\n \n \n \n Low-dose ketamine or dexmedetomidine did not result in early bowel recovery despite lower pain scores and opioid consumption in patients undergoing open GI malignancy surgeries.\n \n Key Message:\n \n What is known: Ketamine and dexmedetomidine may promote bowel recovery by improving analgesia and decreasing opioid usage.Main findings: This randomized controlled trial found no evidence of earlier bowel recovery with ketamine or dexmedetomidine versus placebo despite lower pain scores and analgesic consumption in the ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups.\n \n","PeriodicalId":508221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_322_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

No studies have compared the effects of ketamine and dexmedetomidine on bowel recovery. We evaluated the effects of intraoperative low-dose ketamine or dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative bowel recovery in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy surgeries. This placebo-controlled, randomized study was carried out in 84 American Society of Anesthesiologists II patients, aged 18–70 years, of either gender, undergoing elective open GI malignancy surgeries. Patients received intraoperative infusion of ketamine @ 0.1 mg kg-1 h-1 (KET), dexmedetomidine @ 0.25 μg kg-1 h-1 (DEX), or normal saline (placebo). Primary outcome was the time to first flatus and/or stool. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation, total analgesic requirement, postoperative pain scores, time to feeds, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and the incidence of adverse events. Continuous data were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal–Wallis test. Categorical data were analyzed by the Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test. Median time to passage of flatus and/or stool was 3 [interquartile range (IQR) 2–3] days in the KET group, 2 [IQR 2–3] days in the DEX group, and 2 [IQR 2–3] days in the placebo group (P = 0.53 for placebo vs. KET, 0.81 for placebo vs. DEX, and 0.99 for KET vs. DEX). Pain scores and analgesic consumption were significantly less in the intervention groups versus placebo (P < 0.001). No difference was seen in other secondary outcomes. Low-dose ketamine or dexmedetomidine did not result in early bowel recovery despite lower pain scores and opioid consumption in patients undergoing open GI malignancy surgeries. Key Message: What is known: Ketamine and dexmedetomidine may promote bowel recovery by improving analgesia and decreasing opioid usage.Main findings: This randomized controlled trial found no evidence of earlier bowel recovery with ketamine or dexmedetomidine versus placebo despite lower pain scores and analgesic consumption in the ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术中小剂量氯胺酮与右美托咪定输注对胃肠道恶性肿瘤手术患者术后肠道恢复的影响:安慰剂对照随机试验
目前还没有研究比较氯胺酮和右美托咪定对肠道恢复的影响。我们评估了术中输注低剂量氯胺酮或右美托咪定对胃肠道恶性肿瘤手术患者术后肠道恢复的影响。 这项安慰剂对照随机研究在 84 名美国麻醉医师协会 II 级患者中进行,患者年龄在 18-70 岁之间,性别不限,均接受择期开放式消化道恶性肿瘤手术。患者术中输注氯胺酮(0.1 毫克/公斤-1 小时-1)、右美托咪定(0.25 微克/公斤-1 小时-1)或生理盐水(安慰剂)。主要结果是首次胀气和/或排便的时间。次要结果包括拔管时间、总镇痛剂需求量、术后疼痛评分、进食时间、重症监护室(ICU)和住院时间以及不良事件发生率。连续数据采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)或Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析。分类数据采用卡方检验(Chi-square test)或费雪精确检验(Fisher's exact test)进行分析。 KET 组排出胀气和/或粪便的中位时间为 3 [四分位距 (IQR) 2-3] 天,DEX 组为 2 [IQR 2-3] 天,安慰剂组为 2 [IQR 2-3] 天(安慰剂 vs. KET 的 P = 0.53,安慰剂 vs. DEX 的 P = 0.81,KET vs. DEX 的 P = 0.99)。与安慰剂组相比,干预组的疼痛评分和镇痛剂用量明显减少(P < 0.001)。其他次要结果无差异。 尽管开放性消化道恶性肿瘤手术患者的疼痛评分和阿片类药物用量较低,但低剂量氯胺酮或右美托咪定并不能使患者尽早恢复肠道功能。 关键信息: 已知信息:氯胺酮和右美托咪定可通过改善镇痛和减少阿片类药物用量促进肠道恢复:这项随机对照试验发现,尽管氯胺酮组和右美托咪定组的疼痛评分和镇痛剂用量较低,但没有证据表明氯胺酮或右美托咪定与安慰剂相比能加快肠道恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block in truncal surgeries: A narrative review Anesthetic challenges in using posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach for phaeochromocytoma in pregnancy A case of lost endotracheal tube PONV, beyond “Apfel” score Clinical experience with stellate ganglion block in a neonate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1