Resisting coloniality in agriculture: A decolonial analysis of Florida’s agricultural migrant workers’ experiences

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture and Human Values Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1007/s10460-024-10578-z
Whitney Stone, Jamie Loizzo, Alison E. Adams, Sebastian Galindo, Cecilia Suarez, Ricky Telg
{"title":"Resisting coloniality in agriculture: A\n decolonial analysis of Florida’s agricultural migrant workers’\n experiences","authors":"Whitney Stone,&nbsp;Jamie Loizzo,&nbsp;Alison E. Adams,&nbsp;Sebastian Galindo,&nbsp;Cecilia Suarez,&nbsp;Ricky Telg","doi":"10.1007/s10460-024-10578-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The U.S. agricultural sector relies heavily on agricultural migrant\n workers, and Florida has a history of (im)migrant labor. However, this system is\n historically rooted in colonization, and its systems of oppression remain.\n Currently, migrant workers operate in various systems of oppression, including\n social, health, and environmental inequities, all of which have been worsened by the\n COVID-19 pandemic. The literature regarding decoloniality, muted group theory, and\n decolonial intersectionality has a strong history of uncovering how multiple\n oppressions overlap for vulnerable and marginalized groups in the US. We draw on\n this literature to ask: 1) how can examining participants’ stories through\n decolonial intersectionality help explore structural and institutional racism and\n the dominance of muting? and 2) how can participants recount how they resist\n oppression and/or unmute in telling their stories? To answer these questions,\n literary portraits were co-created with farmworkers and community liaisons about\n participants’ experiences. The authors used decoloniality, muted group theory, and\n decolonial intersectionality to analyze participants’ creative non-fiction stories.\n Farmworkers recounted through their stories that they were often devalued, had their\n humanity questioned, and negotiated their survival, especially during COVID-19.\n However, they were able to resist the oppressions of coloniality through their\n families, faith, pride, and love. Recommendations include using storytelling\n techniques to align with farmworkers’ wants in research as well as assist in\n communicating about issues regarding health and safety. Non-profit organizations,\n centers of faith, and universities can assist in serving the needs of agricultural\n migrant workers related to childcare, food security, and worksite and home safety\n issues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"41 4","pages":"1725 - 1740"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-024-10578-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. agricultural sector relies heavily on agricultural migrant workers, and Florida has a history of (im)migrant labor. However, this system is historically rooted in colonization, and its systems of oppression remain. Currently, migrant workers operate in various systems of oppression, including social, health, and environmental inequities, all of which have been worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic. The literature regarding decoloniality, muted group theory, and decolonial intersectionality has a strong history of uncovering how multiple oppressions overlap for vulnerable and marginalized groups in the US. We draw on this literature to ask: 1) how can examining participants’ stories through decolonial intersectionality help explore structural and institutional racism and the dominance of muting? and 2) how can participants recount how they resist oppression and/or unmute in telling their stories? To answer these questions, literary portraits were co-created with farmworkers and community liaisons about participants’ experiences. The authors used decoloniality, muted group theory, and decolonial intersectionality to analyze participants’ creative non-fiction stories. Farmworkers recounted through their stories that they were often devalued, had their humanity questioned, and negotiated their survival, especially during COVID-19. However, they were able to resist the oppressions of coloniality through their families, faith, pride, and love. Recommendations include using storytelling techniques to align with farmworkers’ wants in research as well as assist in communicating about issues regarding health and safety. Non-profit organizations, centers of faith, and universities can assist in serving the needs of agricultural migrant workers related to childcare, food security, and worksite and home safety issues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抵制农业中的殖民主义:对佛罗里达农业移民工人经历的非殖民分析
美国农业部门严重依赖农业移民工人,佛罗里达州有移民劳工的历史。然而,这一制度在历史上植根于殖民,其压迫制度仍然存在。目前,移徙工人在各种压迫制度下工作,包括社会、卫生和环境不平等,所有这些都因COVID-19大流行而恶化。关于非殖民化、静音群体理论和非殖民化交叉性的文献有很强的历史,揭示了美国弱势群体和边缘群体的多重压迫是如何重叠的。我们利用这些文献来提出以下问题:1)通过非殖民化的交叉性来研究参与者的故事如何有助于探索结构性和制度性种族主义以及沉默的主导地位?2)参与者如何讲述他们如何抵抗压迫和/或在讲述他们的故事时不说话?为了回答这些问题,我们与农场工人和社区联络员共同创作了关于参与者经历的文学肖像。作者使用非殖民化、沉默群体理论和非殖民化交叉性来分析参与者的创造性非虚构故事。农场工人讲述了他们的故事,他们的价值经常被贬低,他们的人性受到质疑,他们为生存而谈判,特别是在2019冠状病毒病期间。然而,他们能够通过他们的家庭、信仰、骄傲和爱来抵抗殖民主义的压迫。建议包括使用讲故事的技巧来配合农场工人在研究中的需求,并协助就健康和安全问题进行沟通。非营利组织、宗教中心和大学可以帮助满足农业农民工在儿童保育、食品安全、工作场所和家庭安全等方面的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
期刊最新文献
Books received Zied Haj-Amor, Dong-Gill Kim, and Salem Bouri: Sustainable agriculture adaptation strategies to address climate change by 2050 Xiao Han and Lei Wang: Organic agriculture and biodiversity in China Julie Guthman: The problem with solutions Vincanne Adams: Glyphosate and the swirl: An agro-industrial chemical on the move
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1