Welfare at the Statehouse Democracies: Assessing the Impact of Public Opinion on Welfare Policies at the State Level

Rafael Molina
{"title":"Welfare at the Statehouse Democracies: Assessing the Impact of Public Opinion on Welfare Policies at the State Level","authors":"Rafael Molina","doi":"10.1177/1532673x241253242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A frequent question in discussions about democracy is whether input from the public is ever considered and to what extent by politicians. This influence of public opinion on the realm of welfare policies has not been extensively explored, and most analyses are less precise for being conducted before the passage of the national welfare reform in 1996, better known as the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA). Bringing the analysis to a period after the reform to account for contextual changes since its passage, this study uses the multilevel and poststratification (MRP) model considered superior in analysis of subnational opinion using national survey data to assess the influence of public opinion on welfare policies at the state level. Collecting data from the 2014 CCES and a new developed welfare generosity index, I find that public opinion does not have any influence on how generous welfare programs turn out in their states, unless it is interacted with state government ideology. It seems that the ideology of the state government and the state poverty rate are the major determinants on welfare policies outcomes in the states, although the latter had different effects for TANF and SNAP.","PeriodicalId":504563,"journal":{"name":"American Politics Research","volume":" 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Politics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x241253242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A frequent question in discussions about democracy is whether input from the public is ever considered and to what extent by politicians. This influence of public opinion on the realm of welfare policies has not been extensively explored, and most analyses are less precise for being conducted before the passage of the national welfare reform in 1996, better known as the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA). Bringing the analysis to a period after the reform to account for contextual changes since its passage, this study uses the multilevel and poststratification (MRP) model considered superior in analysis of subnational opinion using national survey data to assess the influence of public opinion on welfare policies at the state level. Collecting data from the 2014 CCES and a new developed welfare generosity index, I find that public opinion does not have any influence on how generous welfare programs turn out in their states, unless it is interacted with state government ideology. It seems that the ideology of the state government and the state poverty rate are the major determinants on welfare policies outcomes in the states, although the latter had different effects for TANF and SNAP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民主国家州议会的福利:评估舆论对州一级福利政策的影响
在有关民主的讨论中,一个经常出现的问题是,政治家是否考虑过公众的意见,以及考虑的程度如何。公众舆论对福利政策领域的影响尚未得到广泛探讨,而且大多数分析都是在 1996 年国家福利改革(即《个人责任与工作机会协调法》(PRWORA))通过之前进行的,因此不够精确。为了考虑到改革通过后的背景变化,本研究将分析引入改革后的时期,使用多层次和后分层(MRP)模型,该模型被认为是使用全国调查数据分析次国家舆论的优选方法,用于评估州一级舆论对福利政策的影响。通过收集2014年CCES的数据和新开发的福利慷慨指数,我发现,除非与州政府的意识形态相互影响,否则公众舆论对各州福利项目的慷慨程度没有任何影响。州政府的意识形态和州贫困率似乎是各州福利政策结果的主要决定因素,尽管后者对 TANF 和 SNAP 有不同的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Language and LGBTQ Politics: The Effect of Changing Group Labels on Public Attitudes A Thermostatic Model of Congressional Elections The Rule of Law in Red and Blue: Affective Polarization and Support for Legal Institutions in the United States Why Making Voting Easier Isn’t Enough: Early Voting, Campaigns, and Voter Turnout Oh, the Places They’ll Go: A Geographic Analysis of Gubernatorial Campaigns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1