Monarch Butterfly Optimization-Based Genetic Algorithm Operators for Nonlinear Constrained Optimization and Design of Engineering Problems

IF 4.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Computational Design and Engineering Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1093/jcde/qwae044
M. A. El-Shorbagy, Taghreed Hamdi Alhadbani
{"title":"Monarch Butterfly Optimization-Based Genetic Algorithm Operators for Nonlinear Constrained Optimization and Design of Engineering Problems","authors":"M. A. El-Shorbagy, Taghreed Hamdi Alhadbani","doi":"10.1093/jcde/qwae044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper aims to present a hybrid method to solve nonlinear constrained optimization problems and engineering design problems (EDPs). The hybrid method is a combination of MBO with the crossover and mutation operators of the genetic algorithm (GA). It is called a hybrid monarch butterfly optimization with genetic algorithm operators (MBO-GAO). Combining MBO and GA operators is meant to overcome the drawbacks of both algorithms while merging their advantages. The self-adaptive crossover (SAC) and the real-valued mutation are the GA operators that are used in MBO-GAO. These operators are merged in a distinctive way within MBO processes to improve the variety of solutions in the later stages of the search process, speed up the convergence process, keep the search from getting stuck in local optima, and achieve a balance between the tendencies of exploration and exploitation. In addition, the greedy approach is presented in both the migration operator and the butterfly adjusting operator, which can only accept offspring of the monarch butterfly groups who are fitter than their parents. Finally, popular test problems, including a set of 19 benchmark problems, are used to test the proposed hybrid algorithm, MBO-GAO. The findings obtained provide evidence supporting the higher performance of MBO-GAO compared to other search techniques. Additionally, the performance of the MBO-GAO is examined for several engineering design problems. The computational results show that the MBO-GAO method exhibits competitiveness and superiority over other optimization algorithms employed for the resolution of engineering design problems.","PeriodicalId":48611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Design and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Design and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwae044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to present a hybrid method to solve nonlinear constrained optimization problems and engineering design problems (EDPs). The hybrid method is a combination of MBO with the crossover and mutation operators of the genetic algorithm (GA). It is called a hybrid monarch butterfly optimization with genetic algorithm operators (MBO-GAO). Combining MBO and GA operators is meant to overcome the drawbacks of both algorithms while merging their advantages. The self-adaptive crossover (SAC) and the real-valued mutation are the GA operators that are used in MBO-GAO. These operators are merged in a distinctive way within MBO processes to improve the variety of solutions in the later stages of the search process, speed up the convergence process, keep the search from getting stuck in local optima, and achieve a balance between the tendencies of exploration and exploitation. In addition, the greedy approach is presented in both the migration operator and the butterfly adjusting operator, which can only accept offspring of the monarch butterfly groups who are fitter than their parents. Finally, popular test problems, including a set of 19 benchmark problems, are used to test the proposed hybrid algorithm, MBO-GAO. The findings obtained provide evidence supporting the higher performance of MBO-GAO compared to other search techniques. Additionally, the performance of the MBO-GAO is examined for several engineering design problems. The computational results show that the MBO-GAO method exhibits competitiveness and superiority over other optimization algorithms employed for the resolution of engineering design problems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于遗传算法的非线性约束优化和工程设计问题的帝王蝶优化算子
本文旨在介绍一种解决非线性约束优化问题和工程设计问题(EDPs)的混合方法。该混合方法是 MBO 与遗传算法(GA)的交叉和突变算子的结合。这种方法被称为带有遗传算法算子的混合帝王蝶优化法(MBO-GAO)。结合 MBO 和 GA 运算符的目的是克服这两种算法的缺点,同时融合它们的优点。自适应交叉(SAC)和实值突变是 MBO-GAO 中使用的 GA 算子。这些算子在 MBO 过程中以一种独特的方式进行了合并,以改善搜索过程后期的解的多样性,加快收敛过程,防止搜索陷入局部最优状态,并实现探索和开发倾向之间的平衡。此外,在迁移算子和蝴蝶调整算子中都提出了贪婪方法,即只能接受比亲代更适合的帝王蝶群体的后代。最后,我们利用流行的测试问题(包括一组 19 个基准问题)来测试所提出的混合算法 MBO-GAO。研究结果证明,与其他搜索技术相比,MBO-GAO 的性能更高。此外,MBO-GAO 的性能还针对几个工程设计问题进行了检验。计算结果表明,在解决工程设计问题时,MBO-GAO 方法比其他优化算法更具竞争力和优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computational Design and Engineering
Journal of Computational Design and Engineering Computer Science-Human-Computer Interaction
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
20.40%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Computational Design and Engineering is an international journal that aims to provide academia and industry with a venue for rapid publication of research papers reporting innovative computational methods and applications to achieve a major breakthrough, practical improvements, and bold new research directions within a wide range of design and engineering: • Theory and its progress in computational advancement for design and engineering • Development of computational framework to support large scale design and engineering • Interaction issues among human, designed artifacts, and systems • Knowledge-intensive technologies for intelligent and sustainable systems • Emerging technology and convergence of technology fields presented with convincing design examples • Educational issues for academia, practitioners, and future generation • Proposal on new research directions as well as survey and retrospectives on mature field.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Microseismic Monitoring: A Fusion of Gaussian-Cauchy and Adaptive Weight Strategies An RNA Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Gradient Descent for Function Optimization Modified Crayfish Optimization Algorithm with Adaptive Spiral Elite Greedy Opposition-based Learning and Search-hide Strategy for Global Optimization Non-dominated sorting simplified swarm optimization for multi-objective omni-channel of pollution routing problem Generative Early Architectural Visualizations: Incorporating Architect's Style-trained Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1