The Vote18 Polemic and Challenges of its Implementation in Malaysia

Q3 Social Sciences Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.22146/jsp.78880
M. Nazaruddin, Mohammad Agus Yusoff
{"title":"The Vote18 Polemic and Challenges of its Implementation in Malaysia","authors":"M. Nazaruddin, Mohammad Agus Yusoff","doi":"10.22146/jsp.78880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vote18 in Malaysia aims to extend voting rights to individuals aged 18 and older from the former voting age threshold of 21 years and older. This article discusses the challenges associated with implementing Vote18 in Malaysia, aiming to fill the gaps in the scholarly debates on Vote18 and the obstacles to implementing it in Malaysia. Even though the federal constitutional amendment to implement Vote18 was ratified in 2019, its implementation was delayed by two years, raising the essential question: What is the rationale for its delay? The primary data were collected from interviews with four respondents, comprising current and past ministers who had a pivotal role in revising the federal constitution and implementing Vote18, whereas secondary data were gathered from books, journals, and online newspapers. The findings revealed four obstacles to implementing Vote18 in Malaysia. First, the state constitution or state body laws, including the Election Offenses Act 1954, the Elections (Conduct of Elections) Regulations 1981, and the Registration of Electors Regulations 2002, must be amended before allowing people aged 18 and over to vote or run for office. Second, merging data and information stored by numerous government departments and agencies, such as the National Registration Department (NRD), is labour-intensive and time-consuming. Third, the development of a new voting system and the necessary infrastructure are still ongoing. Finally, the most critical hindrance is the government's lack of political will to ensure the initiative's success. Therefore, it can be concluded that lowering the age restriction is among the key components in reforming the Malaysian electoral system.","PeriodicalId":36433,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik","volume":"114 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.78880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vote18 in Malaysia aims to extend voting rights to individuals aged 18 and older from the former voting age threshold of 21 years and older. This article discusses the challenges associated with implementing Vote18 in Malaysia, aiming to fill the gaps in the scholarly debates on Vote18 and the obstacles to implementing it in Malaysia. Even though the federal constitutional amendment to implement Vote18 was ratified in 2019, its implementation was delayed by two years, raising the essential question: What is the rationale for its delay? The primary data were collected from interviews with four respondents, comprising current and past ministers who had a pivotal role in revising the federal constitution and implementing Vote18, whereas secondary data were gathered from books, journals, and online newspapers. The findings revealed four obstacles to implementing Vote18 in Malaysia. First, the state constitution or state body laws, including the Election Offenses Act 1954, the Elections (Conduct of Elections) Regulations 1981, and the Registration of Electors Regulations 2002, must be amended before allowing people aged 18 and over to vote or run for office. Second, merging data and information stored by numerous government departments and agencies, such as the National Registration Department (NRD), is labour-intensive and time-consuming. Third, the development of a new voting system and the necessary infrastructure are still ongoing. Finally, the most critical hindrance is the government's lack of political will to ensure the initiative's success. Therefore, it can be concluded that lowering the age restriction is among the key components in reforming the Malaysian electoral system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18 票之争及其在马来西亚实施的挑战
马来西亚的 "Vote18 "旨在将投票权从以前的 21 岁及以上投票年龄门槛扩大到 18 岁及以上的个人。本文讨论了在马来西亚实施 "Vote18 "所面临的挑战,旨在填补有关 "Vote18 "的学术辩论中的空白,以及在马来西亚实施 "Vote18 "的障碍。尽管实施 "十八票 "的联邦宪法修正案已于 2019 年获得批准,但其实施却被推迟了两年,这就提出了一个基本问题:推迟的原因是什么?主要数据来自对四位受访者的访谈,其中包括在修订联邦宪法和实施 "Vote18 "中发挥关键作用的现任和前任部长,而二手数据则来自书籍、期刊和在线报纸。调查结果揭示了马来西亚实施 "18 票 "的四个障碍。首先,在允许年满 18 岁的人投票或竞选公职之前,必须修订州宪法或州机构法,包括《1954 年选举犯罪法》、《1981 年选举(选举行为)条例》和《2002 年选民登记条例》。其次,合并国家登记局(NRD)等众多政府部门和机构存储的数据和信息耗费大量人力和时间。第三,新投票系统和必要基础设施的开发仍在进行中。最后,最关键的障碍是政府缺乏确保该举措成功的政治意愿。因此,可以得出结论,降低年龄限制是马来西亚选举制度改革的关键组成部分之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Geography of Community Supported Agriculture UPAYA PROGRAM SEKOLAH LANSIA DALAM MENINGKATKAN KESEJAHTERAAN LANSIA (Studi Sekolah Lansia Selaras Desa Tandem Hulu II) PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH KABUPATEN GIANYAR DI ERA REFORMASI CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DAN PEMBANGUNAN DESA: Studi Kasus Kebijakan CSR PT Solusi Bangun Indonesia dalam Mendukung Kemandirian Pembangunan Desa Merkawang Kecamatan Tambakboyo Kabupaten Tuban BAHASA DALAM MEMBENTUK INTERAKSI SOSIAL DAN IDENTITAS BUDAYA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1