Carotid Body Tumor Excision with and without Carotid Artery Reconstruction: Equivalency of 30-Day Outcomes over 12 Years in the American College of Surgery National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Database

Surgeries Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.3390/surgeries5020028
Michael Chaney, Alexander Ko, Samuel Coster, Saad Shebrain, Jason Ryan
{"title":"Carotid Body Tumor Excision with and without Carotid Artery Reconstruction: Equivalency of 30-Day Outcomes over 12 Years in the American College of Surgery National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Database","authors":"Michael Chaney, Alexander Ko, Samuel Coster, Saad Shebrain, Jason Ryan","doi":"10.3390/surgeries5020028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are rare benign tumors that arise from the chemoreceptor tissue located at the carotid bifurcation that require excision if symptomatic. Depending on the size and location of the tumor, the carotid artery may need to be repaired after resection. This study aims to assess whether CBT excision with artery resection had higher rates of 30-day postoperative outcomes compared with CBT excision without artery resection. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) registry from 2005 to 2017. They were divided into two groups, based on Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) codes: group A had CBT excision without carotid artery excision (CPT code 60600) and group B with carotid artery excision (CPT code 60605). Patient demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, and 30-days postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Categorical data were analyzed using Pearson’s X2 or Fisher exact tests and presented as proportions (percentages). Continuous data were analyzed using parametric or non-parametric tests as appropriate. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical software package. Results: A total of 463 patients were identified, 410 (88.4%) in group A and 53 (11.4%) in group B. Overall, there were 291 (62.9%) women. A higher proportion of women underwent CBT excision only, compared to men (91.1% [265/291] vs. 84.3% [145/172], p < 0.0001). Demographics and comorbidities were similar between groups. There was no significant difference in the 30-day postoperative outcomes. The reoperation rate was higher in group B (3.8% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.334), while the readmission rate was higher in group A (3.2% vs. 0% p = 0.269), and both were not significantly different. Overall morbidity and serious morbidity were higher in group B (7.5% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.626) and lower in group A (5.7% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.544), respectively, but were not significantly different. Operative time (mean, SD) was higher in group B (187 ± 107 vs. 138 ± 66 min, p < 0.001). However, the median (IQR) of hospital length of stay (LOS) was similar (2 [1, 4] vs. 2 [1, 3] days, p = 0.134). Conclusions: Overall, no difference was noted in the 30-day postoperative outcome between the two surgical approaches of CBT. However, operative time was longer when artery resection was performed. Further research to determine the factors predicting the need for carotid artery resection among patient gender is needed.","PeriodicalId":506240,"journal":{"name":"Surgeries","volume":"102 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5020028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are rare benign tumors that arise from the chemoreceptor tissue located at the carotid bifurcation that require excision if symptomatic. Depending on the size and location of the tumor, the carotid artery may need to be repaired after resection. This study aims to assess whether CBT excision with artery resection had higher rates of 30-day postoperative outcomes compared with CBT excision without artery resection. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) registry from 2005 to 2017. They were divided into two groups, based on Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) codes: group A had CBT excision without carotid artery excision (CPT code 60600) and group B with carotid artery excision (CPT code 60605). Patient demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, and 30-days postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Categorical data were analyzed using Pearson’s X2 or Fisher exact tests and presented as proportions (percentages). Continuous data were analyzed using parametric or non-parametric tests as appropriate. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical software package. Results: A total of 463 patients were identified, 410 (88.4%) in group A and 53 (11.4%) in group B. Overall, there were 291 (62.9%) women. A higher proportion of women underwent CBT excision only, compared to men (91.1% [265/291] vs. 84.3% [145/172], p < 0.0001). Demographics and comorbidities were similar between groups. There was no significant difference in the 30-day postoperative outcomes. The reoperation rate was higher in group B (3.8% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.334), while the readmission rate was higher in group A (3.2% vs. 0% p = 0.269), and both were not significantly different. Overall morbidity and serious morbidity were higher in group B (7.5% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.626) and lower in group A (5.7% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.544), respectively, but were not significantly different. Operative time (mean, SD) was higher in group B (187 ± 107 vs. 138 ± 66 min, p < 0.001). However, the median (IQR) of hospital length of stay (LOS) was similar (2 [1, 4] vs. 2 [1, 3] days, p = 0.134). Conclusions: Overall, no difference was noted in the 30-day postoperative outcome between the two surgical approaches of CBT. However, operative time was longer when artery resection was performed. Further research to determine the factors predicting the need for carotid artery resection among patient gender is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈动脉体瘤切除术与颈动脉重建术:美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划 (ACS-NSQIP) 数据库中 12 年内 30 天结果的等效性
背景:颈动脉体瘤(CBT)是一种罕见的良性肿瘤,来自颈动脉分叉处的化学感受器组织,如果有症状则需要切除。根据肿瘤的大小和位置,切除后可能需要修复颈动脉。本研究旨在评估与不切除动脉的 CBT 切除术相比,切除动脉的 CBT 切除术是否具有更高的术后 30 天预后率。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究。2005年至2017年期间,美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)登记处对患者进行了鉴定。根据《现行手术术语》(CPT®)代码将他们分为两组:A组进行了CBT切除术,但未切除颈动脉(CPT代码60600);B组进行了颈动脉切除术(CPT代码60605)。比较了两组患者的人口统计学特征、合并疾病和术后 30 天的疗效。分类数据采用皮尔逊 X2 检验或费雪精确检验进行分析,并以比例(百分比)表示。连续数据根据情况采用参数或非参数检验进行分析。统计显著性定义为 p < 0.05。统计分析使用 SPSS 统计软件包进行。结果共确认了 463 名患者,其中 A 组 410 人(88.4%),B 组 53 人(11.4%)。仅接受 CBT 切除术的女性比例高于男性(91.1% [265/291] vs. 84.3% [145/172],P < 0.0001)。两组患者的人口统计学特征和合并症相似。术后 30 天的结果无明显差异。B 组的再手术率较高(3.8% 对 1.5%,P = 0.334),而 A 组的再入院率较高(3.2% 对 0% P = 0.269),两组无显著差异。B组的总发病率和严重发病率分别较高(7.5% 对 5.9%,P = 0.626)和较低(5.7% 对 3.9%,P = 0.544),但无明显差异。B 组的手术时间(平均值,标度)更长(187 ± 107 对 138 ± 66 分钟,p < 0.001)。但住院时间(LOS)的中位数(IQR)相似(2 [1, 4] 天 vs. 2 [1, 3] 天,p = 0.134)。结论:总体而言,两种 CBT 手术方法的术后 30 天结果没有差异。不过,动脉切除术的手术时间更长。需要进一步研究确定预测不同性别患者是否需要切除颈动脉的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Severe Attrition and Poor Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Telerehabilitation vs. Standard In-Person Rehabilitation after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Pediatric Intracranial Aneurysms: Experience from a Singapore Children’s Hospital Evaluating Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapies in Rhesus and Cynomolgus Macaques for Predictive Modeling in Humans A Bosniak III Cyst Unmasking Tubulocystic Renal Cell Carcinoma in an Adolescent: Management with Selective Arterial Clamping and Robotic Enucleation Osteoimmunology: An Overview of the Interplay of the Immune System and the Bone Tissue in Fracture Healing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1