Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke in Chinese Patients: Protocol for the ORIGINAL Study

Xia Meng, Shuya Li, Hongguo Dai, Guozhi Lu, Weiwei Wang, Fengyuan Che, Yu Geng, Minghui Sun, Xiyan Li, Yongjun Wang
{"title":"Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke in Chinese Patients: Protocol for the ORIGINAL Study","authors":"Xia Meng, Shuya Li, Hongguo Dai, Guozhi Lu, Weiwei Wang, Fengyuan Che, Yu Geng, Minghui Sun, Xiyan Li, Yongjun Wang","doi":"10.1161/svin.124.001363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Tenecteplase, a bioengineered variant of alteplase, is a new alternative thrombolytic agent. The ORIGINAL study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus standard care in Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.\n \n \n \n This is a multicenter phase III study that employs a randomized (1:1), active‐controlled, parallel‐group, prospective, open‐label, blinded–end point design. Adult participants (aged ≥18 years) with acute ischemic stroke who are eligible for intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of symptom onset according to current guideline recommendations are recruited from ≈55 neurology clinics/stroke centers throughout China.\n \n \n \n The primary objective of the ORIGINAL study is to demonstrate the noninferiority of tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) to alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) on the basis of the proportion of patients who achieve a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 on day 90, that is, a favorable functional outcome. The prespecified noninferiority risk ratio margin is 0.937. Secondary end points include other functional outcomes and the following safety end points: adjudicated symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (up to 36 hours after the end of study drug administration) based on the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III definition; all‐cause death within 90 days; and the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score of 5 or 6 on day 90.\n \n \n \n It is anticipated that the results of this study will contribute to the growing body of evidence for the noninferiority of tenecteplase to alteplase given within 4.5 hours of acute ischemic stroke symptom onset and support a new indication for tenecteplase in China.\n \n \n \n \n NCT04915729 (\n https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04915729\n )\n \n","PeriodicalId":21977,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","volume":"106 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.124.001363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tenecteplase, a bioengineered variant of alteplase, is a new alternative thrombolytic agent. The ORIGINAL study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus standard care in Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. This is a multicenter phase III study that employs a randomized (1:1), active‐controlled, parallel‐group, prospective, open‐label, blinded–end point design. Adult participants (aged ≥18 years) with acute ischemic stroke who are eligible for intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of symptom onset according to current guideline recommendations are recruited from ≈55 neurology clinics/stroke centers throughout China. The primary objective of the ORIGINAL study is to demonstrate the noninferiority of tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) to alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) on the basis of the proportion of patients who achieve a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 on day 90, that is, a favorable functional outcome. The prespecified noninferiority risk ratio margin is 0.937. Secondary end points include other functional outcomes and the following safety end points: adjudicated symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (up to 36 hours after the end of study drug administration) based on the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III definition; all‐cause death within 90 days; and the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score of 5 or 6 on day 90. It is anticipated that the results of this study will contribute to the growing body of evidence for the noninferiority of tenecteplase to alteplase given within 4.5 hours of acute ischemic stroke symptom onset and support a new indication for tenecteplase in China. NCT04915729 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04915729 )
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特奈普酶与阿替普酶在中国急性缺血性卒中患者中的应用:原始研究方案
替奈普酶是阿替普酶的生物工程变体,是一种新型替代溶栓药物。ORIGINAL 研究旨在评估替奈普酶与标准治疗相比,在症状出现后 4.5 小时内治疗中国急性缺血性脑卒中患者的有效性和安全性。 这是一项多中心 III 期研究,采用随机(1:1)、主动对照、平行组、前瞻性、开放标签、盲法终点设计。该研究从全国55家神经内科诊所/卒中中心招募符合现行指南推荐的急性缺血性卒中患者(年龄≥18岁),并在症状出现后4.5小时内进行静脉溶栓治疗。 ORIGINAL研究的主要目的是证明替奈普酶(0.25 mg/kg)与阿替普酶(0.9 mg/kg)的非劣效性,依据是第90天达到改良Rankin量表0分或1分的患者比例,即良好的功能预后。预设的非劣效性风险比值为0.937。次要终点包括其他功能预后和以下安全性终点:根据欧洲急性卒中合作研究 III 定义判定的症状性脑出血(研究用药结束后 36 小时内);90 天内全因死亡;以及第 90 天改良 Rankin 量表评分为 5 分或 6 分的患者比例。 预计这项研究的结果将为越来越多的证据证明在急性缺血性卒中症状出现后4.5小时内给予替奈普酶不优于阿替普酶做出贡献,并支持替奈普酶在中国获得新的适应症。 NCT04915729 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04915729 )
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostication Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Modified Hunt and Hess Grading Scale Intra‐arterial Selective Bevacizumab Administration in the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Early Experience in 12 Hemispheres Sex Disparities in Mortality After Endovascular Therapy in Large Core Infarcts Predicting Recanalization Failure With Conventional Devices During Endovascular Treatment Related to Vessel Occlusion Antiplatelet Therapy and Platelet Activity Testing for Neurointerventional Procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1