Analysis of Vascular Anatomy in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap

IF 0.2 Q4 SURGERY Formosan Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1097/fs9.0000000000000128
Hsu-Yun Tsai, Chien-Liang Fang, Chin-Hao Hsu, Chin-Wen Tu, Yueh-Lin Wu, Hsin-Yi Yang
{"title":"Analysis of Vascular Anatomy in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap","authors":"Hsu-Yun Tsai, Chien-Liang Fang, Chin-Hao Hsu, Chin-Wen Tu, Yueh-Lin Wu, Hsin-Yi Yang","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. One of the existing challenges of the procedure is maintaining a pedicle of suitable length and diameter for flap survival. In this study, we analyzed the vascular anatomy of bi-pedicle DIEP flap cases in terms of the vessel diameter, the rate of secondary venae comitantes, and pedicle length to determine the efficacy of microvascular anastomosis and venous drainage.\n \n \n \n We retrospectively evaluated 108 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction using free bi-pedicle DIEP flaps between 2012 and 2019. The patient characteristics, diameters of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and accompanying veins (DIEVs), DIEA pedicle length, vessel re-anastomosis rate, flap failure rate, and fat necrosis were recorded.\n \n \n \n Comparison of the right side and left side diameters and pedicle lengths obtained showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). A total of 148 sides (68.52%) of flaps had double venous drainage, whereas 68 sides (31.48%) of flaps had one. Vein congestion occurred in 5 cases, and all involved with just one DIEV anastomosis. No arterial occlusions were observed.\n \n \n \n This is an analysis of extensive clinical data in terms of DIEA, DIEV, and pedicle length. The low vein congestion rate observed reveals adequate venous drainage was achieved in the DIEV system for DIEP reconstruction. Adequate deep inferior epigastric vessel pedicle length and vessel size, as well as greater than 60% of flaps with secondary DIEV, may allow comfortable microsurgery with reduced complications.\n","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. One of the existing challenges of the procedure is maintaining a pedicle of suitable length and diameter for flap survival. In this study, we analyzed the vascular anatomy of bi-pedicle DIEP flap cases in terms of the vessel diameter, the rate of secondary venae comitantes, and pedicle length to determine the efficacy of microvascular anastomosis and venous drainage. We retrospectively evaluated 108 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction using free bi-pedicle DIEP flaps between 2012 and 2019. The patient characteristics, diameters of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and accompanying veins (DIEVs), DIEA pedicle length, vessel re-anastomosis rate, flap failure rate, and fat necrosis were recorded. Comparison of the right side and left side diameters and pedicle lengths obtained showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). A total of 148 sides (68.52%) of flaps had double venous drainage, whereas 68 sides (31.48%) of flaps had one. Vein congestion occurred in 5 cases, and all involved with just one DIEV anastomosis. No arterial occlusions were observed. This is an analysis of extensive clinical data in terms of DIEA, DIEV, and pedicle length. The low vein congestion rate observed reveals adequate venous drainage was achieved in the DIEV system for DIEP reconstruction. Adequate deep inferior epigastric vessel pedicle length and vessel size, as well as greater than 60% of flaps with secondary DIEV, may allow comfortable microsurgery with reduced complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深下上腹穿孔皮瓣的血管解剖分析
下腹深动脉穿孔(DIEP)皮瓣被认为是自体乳房重建的黄金标准。该手术目前面临的挑战之一是保持合适长度和直径的蒂以保证皮瓣存活。在这项研究中,我们分析了双蒂 DIEP 皮瓣病例的血管解剖情况,包括血管直径、继发性合并静脉率和蒂长度,以确定微血管吻合和静脉引流的效果。 我们对2012年至2019年期间使用游离双蒂DIEP皮瓣进行即刻乳房重建的108例患者进行了回顾性评估。我们记录了患者特征、下腹深动脉(DIEA)和伴行静脉(DIEV)直径、DIEA蒂长度、血管再吻合率、皮瓣失败率和脂肪坏死情况。 比较右侧和左侧的直径和瓣蒂长度,结果显示无明显差异(P > 0.05)。共有 148 侧(68.52%)皮瓣有双静脉引流,而 68 侧(31.48%)皮瓣只有一静脉引流。静脉充血发生在 5 个病例中,所有病例都只涉及一个 DIEV 吻合口。未观察到动脉闭塞。 这是对 DIEA、DIEV 和瓣蒂长度等大量临床数据的分析。观察到的低静脉充血率表明,DIEV 系统在 DIEP 重建中实现了充分的静脉引流。足够的下腹深血管蒂长度和血管大小,以及超过 60% 的皮瓣具有二次 DIEV,可使显微手术舒适并减少并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Formosan Journal of Surgery, a publication of Taiwan Surgical Association, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.e-fjs.org. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
期刊最新文献
Urethral Pseudodiverticulum with Left-Sided Non-Functioning Kidney: Case Report Upholding Ethical Standards in Post-Publication Interactions: A Call to Action Efficacy and Safety of Extended-Release Dinalbuphine Sebacate for Postoperative Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Infected Urachal Cyst with Urethral Stricture Disease presenting with intraperitoneal perforation of cyst and pyoperitoneum AI-powered medicine is being repurposed to find novel surgical infection cures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1