Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated with Admission Among Patients With Minor Isolated Extremity Firearm Injuries: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Arielle C. Thomas, R. Royan, A. Nathens, Brendan T. Campbell, Susheel Reddy, Sarabeth Spitzer, D. Hamad, Angie Jang, Anne M. Stey
{"title":"Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated with Admission Among Patients With Minor Isolated Extremity Firearm Injuries: A Propensity-Matched Analysis","authors":"Arielle C. Thomas, R. Royan, A. Nathens, Brendan T. Campbell, Susheel Reddy, Sarabeth Spitzer, D. Hamad, Angie Jang, Anne M. Stey","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To quantify the association between insurance and hospital admission following minor isolated extremity firearm injury.\n \n \n \n The association between insurance and injury admission has not been examined.\n \n \n \n This was an observational retrospective cohort study of minor isolated extremity firearm injury captured in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient and Emergency Department Databases in 6 states (New York, Arkansas, Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Florida, and Maryland) from 2016 to 2017 among patients aged 16 years or older. The primary exposure was insurance. Admitted patients were propensity score matched to nonadmitted patients on age, extremity Abbreviated Injury Score, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index with exact matching within hospital to adjust for selection bias. A general estimating equation logistic regression estimated the association between insurance and odds of admission in the matched cohort while controlling for sex, race, injury intent, injury type, hospital profit type, and trauma center designation with observations clustered by propensity score-matched pairs within hospital.\n \n \n \n A total of 8151 patients presented to hospital with a minor isolated extremity firearm injury between 2016 and 2017 in 6 states. Patients were 88.0% male, 56.6% Black, and 71.7% aged 16 to 36 years old, and 22.1% were admitted. A total of 2090 patients were matched on propensity for admission. Privately insured matched patients had 1.70 higher adjusted odds of admission and 95% confidence interval of 1.30 to 2.22, compared with uninsured after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.\n \n \n \n Insurance was associated with hospital admission for minor isolated extremity firearm injury.\n","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":"65 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To quantify the association between insurance and hospital admission following minor isolated extremity firearm injury. The association between insurance and injury admission has not been examined. This was an observational retrospective cohort study of minor isolated extremity firearm injury captured in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient and Emergency Department Databases in 6 states (New York, Arkansas, Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Florida, and Maryland) from 2016 to 2017 among patients aged 16 years or older. The primary exposure was insurance. Admitted patients were propensity score matched to nonadmitted patients on age, extremity Abbreviated Injury Score, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index with exact matching within hospital to adjust for selection bias. A general estimating equation logistic regression estimated the association between insurance and odds of admission in the matched cohort while controlling for sex, race, injury intent, injury type, hospital profit type, and trauma center designation with observations clustered by propensity score-matched pairs within hospital. A total of 8151 patients presented to hospital with a minor isolated extremity firearm injury between 2016 and 2017 in 6 states. Patients were 88.0% male, 56.6% Black, and 71.7% aged 16 to 36 years old, and 22.1% were admitted. A total of 2090 patients were matched on propensity for admission. Privately insured matched patients had 1.70 higher adjusted odds of admission and 95% confidence interval of 1.30 to 2.22, compared with uninsured after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. Insurance was associated with hospital admission for minor isolated extremity firearm injury.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与轻微孤立性肢端枪伤患者入院相关的患者和医院特征:倾向匹配分析
量化轻微孤立肢体枪伤后保险与入院之间的关联。 保险与受伤入院之间的关系尚未得到研究。 这是一项观察性回顾性队列研究,研究对象为 2016 年至 2017 年期间 6 个州(纽约州、阿肯色州、威斯康星州、马萨诸塞州、佛罗里达州和马里兰州)的轻微孤立肢体枪伤患者,数据采集于医疗成本与利用项目州住院患者和急诊科数据库。主要接触因素是保险。入院患者与非入院患者在年龄、肢体简略损伤评分和Elixhauser综合指数上进行倾向评分匹配,并在医院内进行精确匹配,以调整选择偏差。一般估计方程逻辑回归估计了匹配队列中保险与入院几率之间的关系,同时控制了性别、种族、受伤意图、受伤类型、医院利润类型和创伤中心指定,观察结果按医院内倾向得分匹配对分组。 2016年至2017年期间,6个州共有8151名轻微孤立肢体火器伤患者到医院就诊。患者中88.0%为男性,56.6%为黑人,71.7%年龄在16至36岁之间,22.1%为住院患者。共有 2090 名患者与入院倾向相匹配。在对患者和医院特征进行调整后,与未投保的患者相比,投保私人保险的匹配患者的调整后入院几率高出 1.70,95% 置信区间为 1.30 至 2.22。 保险与轻微孤立肢体火器伤入院相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Within-hospital Temporal Clustering of Postoperative Complications and Implications for Safety Monitoring and Benchmarking Using ACS-NSQIP Data Association Between Surgeon Sex and Days Alive at Home Following Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study Response to Comment by Dr. Kuang on Our Manuscript “Immediate Oral Refeeding in Patients With Mild and Moderate Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial (PADI trial)” Visual Mapping of Operating Theater Team Dynamics and Communication for Reflexive Feedback and Surgical Practice Optimization Surgical Outcomes and Sociodemographic Disparities Across All Races: An ACS-NSQIP and NHIS Multi-Institutional Analysis of Over 7.5 Million Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1