Correlation between The Duration of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Time and The Occurrence of Morbidity and Mortality in Conventional Adult Cardiac Surgery

Mohamed Elgariah, Tarek Omran
{"title":"Correlation between The Duration of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Time and The Occurrence of Morbidity and Mortality in Conventional Adult Cardiac Surgery","authors":"Mohamed Elgariah, Tarek Omran","doi":"10.21608/ijma.2024.247713.1861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article information Background: In the current era of surgical practice, conventional cardiac surgery still occupies the main bulk of operations, but its postoperative complications are numerous and can lead to morbidity and mortality. Cardiopulmonary bypass time is a major risk factor in cardiac surgery. Several surgeons underestimate the importance of reducing bypass time and its effect on patient outcomes, and there is no known cutoff time for bypass that is associated with higher complications. Aim of the work: To assess the correlation between bypass time and patient outcomes and clarify the relevant period or a cutoff time for safe cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients and Methods: A retrospective single-center comparative study of 450 cases of conventional cardiac surgery, 300 valve surgeries and 150 coronary bypass surgeries in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Tanta University between January 2018 and January 2023, categorized into 3 groups: Group A: bypass time less than 60 minutes, Group B: bypass time from 60 to 120 minutes, Group C: bypass time more than 120 minutes. Results: There was a significant difference between the 3 groups in favor of Group A with the least bypass time regarding post-operative renal complications [p-value = 0.002], respiratory complications [p-value = 0.013], neurologic complications [p-value = 0.001], multiple blood transfusions [p-value = 0.04], infections [p-value = 0.04] and mortality [p-value = 0-001]. However, no significant difference regarding demographic data, comorbidities, creatinine level and ejection fraction. Conclusion: Bypass time is a major predictor and is proportionally related to morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery; a bypass time up to 60 minutes is the safest with the least morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":53130,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Arts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijma.2024.247713.1861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article information Background: In the current era of surgical practice, conventional cardiac surgery still occupies the main bulk of operations, but its postoperative complications are numerous and can lead to morbidity and mortality. Cardiopulmonary bypass time is a major risk factor in cardiac surgery. Several surgeons underestimate the importance of reducing bypass time and its effect on patient outcomes, and there is no known cutoff time for bypass that is associated with higher complications. Aim of the work: To assess the correlation between bypass time and patient outcomes and clarify the relevant period or a cutoff time for safe cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients and Methods: A retrospective single-center comparative study of 450 cases of conventional cardiac surgery, 300 valve surgeries and 150 coronary bypass surgeries in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Tanta University between January 2018 and January 2023, categorized into 3 groups: Group A: bypass time less than 60 minutes, Group B: bypass time from 60 to 120 minutes, Group C: bypass time more than 120 minutes. Results: There was a significant difference between the 3 groups in favor of Group A with the least bypass time regarding post-operative renal complications [p-value = 0.002], respiratory complications [p-value = 0.013], neurologic complications [p-value = 0.001], multiple blood transfusions [p-value = 0.04], infections [p-value = 0.04] and mortality [p-value = 0-001]. However, no significant difference regarding demographic data, comorbidities, creatinine level and ejection fraction. Conclusion: Bypass time is a major predictor and is proportionally related to morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery; a bypass time up to 60 minutes is the safest with the least morbidity and mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规成人心脏手术中心肺旁路时间与发病率和死亡率之间的关系
文章信息 背景:在当前的外科实践中,传统的心脏手术仍占据手术的主要部分,但其术后并发症很多,可导致发病率和死亡率。心肺旁路时间是心脏手术的主要风险因素。一些外科医生低估了缩短分流时间的重要性及其对患者预后的影响,目前还没有已知的分流时间与较高的并发症相关联。工作目标评估分流时间与患者预后之间的相关性,明确安全心肺分流的相关时间段或临界时间。患者和方法:回顾性单中心比较研究,对象为 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间坦塔大学心胸外科的 450 例常规心脏手术、300 例瓣膜手术和 150 例冠状动脉搭桥手术,分为 3 组:A组:搭桥时间少于60分钟,B组:搭桥时间为60至120分钟,C组:搭桥时间超过120分钟。结果在术后肾脏并发症[p 值 = 0.002]、呼吸系统并发症[p 值 = 0.013]、神经系统并发症[p 值 = 0.001]、多次输血[p 值 = 0.04]、感染[p 值 = 0.04]和死亡率[p 值 = 0-001]方面,3 组之间存在明显差异,而分流时间最短的 A 组更占优势。但在人口统计学数据、合并症、肌酐水平和射血分数方面无明显差异。结论分流时间是心脏手术发病率和死亡率的主要预测因素,并与之成正比;分流时间不超过 60 分钟最安全,发病率和死亡率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unilateral Stereotactic Radiofrequency Thalamotomy for Tremors in Parkinson’s Patients Study of Early versus Delayed Oral Fluid and Food after Cesarean Section Comparative Study Between the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Mini Gastric Bypass for Morbidly Obese Patients Effect of Resistance Training on Physical Performance in Underweight Females Efficacy of Topical Latanoprost Versus Topical Minoxidil In the Treatment of Alopecia Areata: Clinical and Dermoscopic Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1