Shoichi Tamura, Kota Okamura, Daisuke Uetake, Takashi Matsumura
{"title":"Effect of Strain Hardening on Burr Control in Drilling of Austenitic Stainless Steel","authors":"Shoichi Tamura, Kota Okamura, Daisuke Uetake, Takashi Matsumura","doi":"10.20965/ijat.2024.p0417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Austenitic stainless steel has been widely used in various industries, such as aerospace, medical, and hydrogen energy, due to its high strength over a wide range of temperatures, corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility. However, stainless steel is a difficult-to-cut metal because its ductility and low thermal conductivity induce a strain hardening with significant plastic deformation at high temperatures. Burr formed at the back side of a plate is a critical issue which deteriorates the surface quality, especially in drilling. Burr removal operation, therefore, should be done in the machine shop. This study discusses the effect of strain hardening of austenitic stainless steel, SUS 316L, on burr formation. Hardness and cutting tests were conducted to compare the strain hardening effect for three types of workpieces: as-received, pre-machined, and tensile treated specimens. In the employed specimens, the tensile treated specimen is harder than the as-received specimen. Those specimens have uniform hardness in the depth direction from surfaces. Pre-machined specimen, in which the back side of the plate was finished by face milling, has a distribution of hardness in the depth direction from a surface. The highest hardness appears in the subsurface of the pre-machined specimen. The cutting forces in the steady processes, in which the entire edges remove material, were nearly the same as the tested specimens each other. However, remarkable differences were confirmed in the chip thickness and burr formation. The higher strain hardening of the tensile treated specimen is effective to suppress burr formation. The cutting characteristics are then identified to associate burr control with the shear plane model of orthogonal cutting using an energy-based force model. The shear stresses, shear angles, and friction angles of the tensile treated and as-received specimens are compared to discuss the effect of strain hardening on reduction of burr formation.","PeriodicalId":43716,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Automation Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Automation Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2024.p0417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Austenitic stainless steel has been widely used in various industries, such as aerospace, medical, and hydrogen energy, due to its high strength over a wide range of temperatures, corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility. However, stainless steel is a difficult-to-cut metal because its ductility and low thermal conductivity induce a strain hardening with significant plastic deformation at high temperatures. Burr formed at the back side of a plate is a critical issue which deteriorates the surface quality, especially in drilling. Burr removal operation, therefore, should be done in the machine shop. This study discusses the effect of strain hardening of austenitic stainless steel, SUS 316L, on burr formation. Hardness and cutting tests were conducted to compare the strain hardening effect for three types of workpieces: as-received, pre-machined, and tensile treated specimens. In the employed specimens, the tensile treated specimen is harder than the as-received specimen. Those specimens have uniform hardness in the depth direction from surfaces. Pre-machined specimen, in which the back side of the plate was finished by face milling, has a distribution of hardness in the depth direction from a surface. The highest hardness appears in the subsurface of the pre-machined specimen. The cutting forces in the steady processes, in which the entire edges remove material, were nearly the same as the tested specimens each other. However, remarkable differences were confirmed in the chip thickness and burr formation. The higher strain hardening of the tensile treated specimen is effective to suppress burr formation. The cutting characteristics are then identified to associate burr control with the shear plane model of orthogonal cutting using an energy-based force model. The shear stresses, shear angles, and friction angles of the tensile treated and as-received specimens are compared to discuss the effect of strain hardening on reduction of burr formation.
奥氏体不锈钢因其在较宽温度范围内的高强度、耐腐蚀性和生物相容性,已被广泛应用于航空航天、医疗和氢能等各行各业。然而,不锈钢是一种难以切割的金属,因为它的延展性和低导热性会导致应变硬化,并在高温下产生显著的塑性变形。在钢板背面形成的毛刺是一个关键问题,它会降低表面质量,尤其是在钻孔时。因此,去除毛刺的操作应在机加工车间进行。本研究讨论了奥氏体不锈钢 SUS 316L 的应变硬化对毛刺形成的影响。为了比较应变硬化对三种工件的影响,我们对三种工件进行了硬度和切削试验,这三种工件分别是原样试样、预加工试样和拉伸处理试样。在使用的试样中,拉伸处理试样的硬度高于原样试样。这些试样在从表面开始的深度方向上硬度均匀。预加工试样的背面经过面铣加工,其硬度在从表面算起的深度方向上呈分布状态。最高硬度出现在预加工试样的次表面。在整个刃口去除材料的稳定加工过程中,切削力与测试试样的切削力几乎相同。然而,切屑厚度和毛刺的形成却存在明显差异。拉伸处理试样的应变硬化程度较高,可有效抑制毛刺的形成。然后确定切削特征,利用基于能量的力模型将毛刺控制与正交切削的剪切平面模型联系起来。通过比较拉伸处理试样和接收试样的剪切应力、剪切角和摩擦角,讨论应变硬化对减少毛刺形成的影响。