Assessing knowledge and practice of online medication purchasing: A pilot study

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pharmacy Education Pub Date : 2024-05-05 DOI:10.46542/pe.2024.243.260265
Gita Nola Sri Haestuti, Nanda Puspita, Khairun Nida
{"title":"Assessing knowledge and practice of online medication purchasing: A pilot study","authors":"Gita Nola Sri Haestuti, Nanda Puspita, Khairun Nida","doi":"10.46542/pe.2024.243.260265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Online Medication Purchasing (OMP) has emerged as a growing concern because of the risk of receiving falsified products and the irrational use of medicines. Despite the government regulation about OMP, more is needed to know whether the residents are aware of this regulation.\nObjective: The study aimed to determine the level of knowledge & practice of OMP and to estimate the factors correlated to it.\nMethod: A pilot project was conducted in the Wanasari village, Cibitung district, Bekasi. A validated questionnaire determined the sociodemographics, knowledge, and practice of 92 participants regarding OMP. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to measure the predictors of OMP knowledge.\nResult: The study showed that slightly over half of the participants have adequate knowledge of OMP (58.7%). Nevertheless, poor knowledge predominantly emerged regarding legal access to antibiotics and controlled medicines. Adequate knowledge of OMP increased for participants with higher education (OR:20.202; 95%CI:3.488-117.020; p = 0.001) and being active workers (OR:8.365; 95%CI:1.974-35.435; p = 0.004).\nConclusion: Education and employment determine OMP knowledge. This study confirms that educational interventions are required to promote good OMP practice and protect health customers from the adverse effects of falsified medications.","PeriodicalId":19944,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2024.243.260265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Online Medication Purchasing (OMP) has emerged as a growing concern because of the risk of receiving falsified products and the irrational use of medicines. Despite the government regulation about OMP, more is needed to know whether the residents are aware of this regulation. Objective: The study aimed to determine the level of knowledge & practice of OMP and to estimate the factors correlated to it. Method: A pilot project was conducted in the Wanasari village, Cibitung district, Bekasi. A validated questionnaire determined the sociodemographics, knowledge, and practice of 92 participants regarding OMP. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to measure the predictors of OMP knowledge. Result: The study showed that slightly over half of the participants have adequate knowledge of OMP (58.7%). Nevertheless, poor knowledge predominantly emerged regarding legal access to antibiotics and controlled medicines. Adequate knowledge of OMP increased for participants with higher education (OR:20.202; 95%CI:3.488-117.020; p = 0.001) and being active workers (OR:8.365; 95%CI:1.974-35.435; p = 0.004). Conclusion: Education and employment determine OMP knowledge. This study confirms that educational interventions are required to promote good OMP practice and protect health customers from the adverse effects of falsified medications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估网上购药的知识和实践:试点研究
背景:由于存在收到伪造产品和不合理用药的风险,网上购药(OMP)日益受到关注。尽管政府对 OMP 有相关规定,但仍需进一步了解居民是否了解这一规定:本研究旨在确定居民对 OMP 的了解和实践水平,并估计与之相关的因素:方法:在勿加西市芝比东区的瓦纳萨里村开展了一个试点项目。一份经过验证的调查问卷确定了 92 名参与者对 OMP 的社会人口学、知识和实践水平。对 OMP 知识的预测因素进行了多变量逻辑回归分析:研究表明,略高于半数的参与者对 OMP 有足够的了解(58.7%)。然而,对合法获取抗生素和受管制药品的了解较少。受过高等教育(OR:20.202; 95%CI:3.488-117.020; p = 0.001)和在职工作者(OR:8.365; 95%CI:1.974-35.435; p = 0.004)的参与者对 OMP 的充分了解程度有所增加:结论:教育和就业决定了对 OMP 的了解程度。本研究证实,需要采取教育干预措施,以促进良好的 OMP 实践,保护健康客户免受假药的不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy Education
Pharmacy Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Pharmacy Education journal provides a research, development and evaluation forum for communication between academic teachers, researchers and practitioners in professional and pharmacy education, with an emphasis on new and established teaching and learning methods, new curriculum and syllabus directions, educational outcomes, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and workforce development. It is a peer-reviewed online open access platform for the dissemination of new ideas in professional pharmacy education and workforce development. Pharmacy Education supports Open Access (OA): free, unrestricted online access to research outputs. Readers are able to access the Journal and individual published articles for free - there are no subscription fees or ''pay per view'' charges. Authors wishing to publish their work in Pharmacy Education do so without incurring any financial costs.
期刊最新文献
Antioxidant activity of Bougainvillea spectabilis ethanol extracts as an aryl hydrocarbon inhibitor Healthcare collaboration intervention: Pre-post study Development and a validation study of comprehensive prescription writing rubrics for medical students Listener, member, and advisor perspectives regarding a pharmacy podcast student organisation Stakeholder perspectives on the need for professional education and competence in pharmacovigilance in Zambia: A cross-sectional survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1