FRACTURE RESISTANCE AND MARGINAL FIT OF ENDOCROWN RESTORATIONS USING THREE DIFFERENT CAD-CAM MATERIALS

Abdallah Lulu, Sanaa Abdel kader, Islam M. Abdel Raheem
{"title":"FRACTURE RESISTANCE AND MARGINAL FIT OF ENDOCROWN RESTORATIONS USING THREE DIFFERENT CAD-CAM MATERIALS","authors":"Abdallah Lulu, Sanaa Abdel kader, Islam M. Abdel Raheem","doi":"10.21608/adjalexu.2023.222675.1397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Endocrown restorations offer a promising alternative to restore endodontically treated teeth. However, various materials are available without being thoroughly evaluated. Purpose: The purpose of the study is to evaluate marginal fit and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations using three CAD-CAM materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen extracted permanent mandibular molars were selected to receive endocrown restoration. Teeth were randomly allocated into three groups based on material type (n=6). (LD): Lithium Disilicate, (FCZ): full contour zirconia, (RNC): resin nanoceramic. All Endocrown restorations were fabricated utilizing CAD-CAM technology. Restorations were adhesively luted to the corresponding prepared teeth and subjected to thermomechanical cycling corresponding to six months of clinical service. Marginal gap was measured before cementation and after cementation and aging using optical microscope. For measuring fracture resistance, samples were loaded till fracture occurs by using Universal Testing Machine. Optical microscope was used to evaluate mode of failure. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used to analyze fracture resistance, while Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used to analyze marginal gap. RESULTS: FCZ had the highest fracture load compared to RNC and LD. Zirconia recorded largest microgaps before cementation. CONCLUSION: FCZ showed the highest fracture resistance values. LD and RNC ceramics showed fracture resistance with comparable values recommending their use as endocrown restorations. The tested groups showed marginal fit results within the bounds of clinically acceptable parameters. The material type and artificial aging process had a significant impact on the marginal gap.","PeriodicalId":7723,"journal":{"name":"Alexandria Dental Journal","volume":"291 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alexandria Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2023.222675.1397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endocrown restorations offer a promising alternative to restore endodontically treated teeth. However, various materials are available without being thoroughly evaluated. Purpose: The purpose of the study is to evaluate marginal fit and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations using three CAD-CAM materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen extracted permanent mandibular molars were selected to receive endocrown restoration. Teeth were randomly allocated into three groups based on material type (n=6). (LD): Lithium Disilicate, (FCZ): full contour zirconia, (RNC): resin nanoceramic. All Endocrown restorations were fabricated utilizing CAD-CAM technology. Restorations were adhesively luted to the corresponding prepared teeth and subjected to thermomechanical cycling corresponding to six months of clinical service. Marginal gap was measured before cementation and after cementation and aging using optical microscope. For measuring fracture resistance, samples were loaded till fracture occurs by using Universal Testing Machine. Optical microscope was used to evaluate mode of failure. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used to analyze fracture resistance, while Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used to analyze marginal gap. RESULTS: FCZ had the highest fracture load compared to RNC and LD. Zirconia recorded largest microgaps before cementation. CONCLUSION: FCZ showed the highest fracture resistance values. LD and RNC ceramics showed fracture resistance with comparable values recommending their use as endocrown restorations. The tested groups showed marginal fit results within the bounds of clinically acceptable parameters. The material type and artificial aging process had a significant impact on the marginal gap.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用三种不同 CAD-CAM 材料制作的内冠修复体的抗折性和边缘密合性
简介:内冠修复为牙体牙髓治疗后的牙齿修复提供了一种很有前景的选择。然而,现有的各种材料尚未经过全面评估。目的:本研究的目的是使用三种 CAD-CAM 材料评估内冠修复体的边缘密合性和抗折性。材料和方法:选择 18 颗拔出的下颌恒磨牙进行冠内修复。根据材料类型将牙齿随机分为三组(n=6)。(LD):LD):二硅酸锂;(FCZ):全轮廓氧化锆;(RNC):树脂纳米陶瓷。所有 Endocrown 修复体均采用 CAD-CAM 技术制作。将修复体粘结到相应的预备牙齿上,并进行相当于临床使用六个月的热力学循环。使用光学显微镜测量粘结前、粘结后和老化后的边缘间隙。为了测量抗折断性,使用万能试验机对样品进行加载直至发生折断。光学显微镜用于评估破坏模式。采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 后检验分析抗折性,采用双因素方差分析和 Tukey 后检验分析边缘间隙。结果:与 RNC 和 LD 相比,FCZ 的断裂载荷最高。氧化锆在粘结前的微间隙最大。结论:FCZ显示出最高的抗断裂强度。LD 和 RNC 陶瓷的抗折强度值相当,建议将它们用作内冠修复体。测试组显示的边缘密合度结果在临床可接受的参数范围内。材料类型和人工老化过程对边缘间隙有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microleakage Assessment Using Different Composite Application Techniques in Primary Molars. An In-Vitro Comparative Study “THERAPEUTIC EFFECT OF FLAXSEEDS ON OSTEOPOROSIS IN ALVEOLAR BONE OF RATS” EVALUATION OF BONE HEALING BY MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS IN RABBITS (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY) EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN MANDIBULAR MOLAR INTER-RADICULAR SEPTUM USING OSSEODENSIFICATION TECHNIQUE (CLINICAL TRIAL) KIAA0101 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL EXPRESSION IN DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA BETWEEN AMELOBLASTOMA AND AMELOBLASTIC CARCINOMA (IN VITRO STUDY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1