Corrigendum to “Statistical Perspective on the Petrological Utility of Polyphase Groundmass Compositions Inferred via Defocused Beam Electron Probe Microanalysis” [Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research (2024)]

IF 2.7 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1111/ggr.12554
Daniel A. Coulthard Jr, Yoshiyuki Iizuka, Georg F. Zellmer, Raimundo Brahm
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Statistical Perspective on the Petrological Utility of Polyphase Groundmass Compositions Inferred via Defocused Beam Electron Probe Microanalysis” [Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research (2024)]","authors":"Daniel A. Coulthard Jr,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Iizuka,&nbsp;Georg F. Zellmer,&nbsp;Raimundo Brahm","doi":"10.1111/ggr.12554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to the incorrect speciation of iron during thermometry modelling, Coulthard <i>et al</i>. (2024) produced an incorrect olivine-liquid equilibrium diagram, which failed to identify multiple potential equilibrium olivine-melt pairs. With the new pairs identified here, the temperatures inferred from olivine-groundmass pairs move closer in temperature space to those inferred from olivine-glass pairs. Additionally, it is recognised that the most significant difference between these thermometry data is due to differences in inferred melt water mass fraction. If a mean value of water is used for all thermometry, the mean temperatures calculated for olivine-glass and olivine-groundmass pairs converge to within 10 °C of one another. This indicates that groundmass compositions inferred via the defocused beam analysis of a polyphase groundmass may reproduce enough information to confidently perform olivine-melt thermometry despite the glass and groundmass data representing significantly different compositions in multivariate space.</p>","PeriodicalId":12631,"journal":{"name":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","volume":"48 2","pages":"359-362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the incorrect speciation of iron during thermometry modelling, Coulthard et al. (2024) produced an incorrect olivine-liquid equilibrium diagram, which failed to identify multiple potential equilibrium olivine-melt pairs. With the new pairs identified here, the temperatures inferred from olivine-groundmass pairs move closer in temperature space to those inferred from olivine-glass pairs. Additionally, it is recognised that the most significant difference between these thermometry data is due to differences in inferred melt water mass fraction. If a mean value of water is used for all thermometry, the mean temperatures calculated for olivine-glass and olivine-groundmass pairs converge to within 10 °C of one another. This indicates that groundmass compositions inferred via the defocused beam analysis of a polyphase groundmass may reproduce enough information to confidently perform olivine-melt thermometry despite the glass and groundmass data representing significantly different compositions in multivariate space.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于 "从统计角度看通过聚焦电子束探针显微分析法推断的多相地层组成的岩石学用途"[地质标准和地质分析研究(2024年)]的更正
Coulthard等人(2024年)由于在测温建模过程中错误地划分了铁的种类,产生了错误的橄榄石-液体平衡图,未能识别多个潜在的橄榄石-熔体平衡对。在这里确定了新的对之后,从橄榄石-地层对推断出的温度在温度空间上更接近于从橄榄石-玻璃对推断出的温度。此外,我们还认识到,这些测温数据之间最显著的差异是由于推断出的熔融水质量分数不同造成的。如果对所有测温数据都使用水的平均值,那么橄榄石-玻璃和橄榄石-地层对计算出的平均温度就会相互趋近,相差不超过 10 °C。这表明,通过对多相地层进行散焦光束分析而推断出的地层成分,尽管玻璃和地层数据在多元空间中的成分有显著差异,但仍能再现足够的信息,从而有把握地进行橄榄石-熔体温度测定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication following peer review.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information IAG Membership Information Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research GGR Handbook of Rock and Mineral Analysis Chapter 5 The Inductively Coupled Plasma GGR Handbook of Rock and Mineral Analysis [Chapter 13] Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1