Management of staple line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Single-center experience

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Marmara Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.5472/marumj.1484454
T. Uprak, Mümin Coşkun, M. U. Ugurlu, Ömer Günal, A. Cingi, C. Yeğen
{"title":"Management of staple line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Single-center experience","authors":"T. Uprak, Mümin Coşkun, M. U. Ugurlu, Ömer Günal, A. Cingi, C. Yeğen","doi":"10.5472/marumj.1484454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: In obesity surgery, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a frequently applied method. However, there are certain \ncomplications. Leakage is one of the most serious complications after surgery, causing postoperative morbidity and sometimes \nmortality. There is no consensus about management of leaks after LSG. In our study, we aimed to present our experience on the \nmanagement of LSG leaks. \nPatients and Methods: Patients who underwent LSG between 2010-2017 in a tertiary university hospital were analyzed retrospectively. \nDemographic characteristics, endoscopic and surgical interventions, morbidity, and mortality rates of patients diagnosed with LSG \nleak were analyzed from prospectively recorded data. \nResults: Leak was observed in 11 (2.15%) of a total of 510 LSG patients. Six (54%) patients were diagnosed as acute and 5 were early \nleaks. Stent was applied to most of the patients (72%) with or without surgical exploration. The average length of stay in hospital was \n21 days. Mortality was observed in 2 patients. \nConclusions: Consequently, leakage after LSG is a complication that requires multimodal therapy. Surgical treatment combined with \nendoscopic intervention may increase success.","PeriodicalId":43341,"journal":{"name":"Marmara Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marmara Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1484454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In obesity surgery, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a frequently applied method. However, there are certain complications. Leakage is one of the most serious complications after surgery, causing postoperative morbidity and sometimes mortality. There is no consensus about management of leaks after LSG. In our study, we aimed to present our experience on the management of LSG leaks. Patients and Methods: Patients who underwent LSG between 2010-2017 in a tertiary university hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, endoscopic and surgical interventions, morbidity, and mortality rates of patients diagnosed with LSG leak were analyzed from prospectively recorded data. Results: Leak was observed in 11 (2.15%) of a total of 510 LSG patients. Six (54%) patients were diagnosed as acute and 5 were early leaks. Stent was applied to most of the patients (72%) with or without surgical exploration. The average length of stay in hospital was 21 days. Mortality was observed in 2 patients. Conclusions: Consequently, leakage after LSG is a complication that requires multimodal therapy. Surgical treatment combined with endoscopic intervention may increase success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜袖带胃切除术后缝合线渗漏的处理:单中心经验
目的:在肥胖症手术中,腹腔镜袖带胃切除术(LSG)是一种常用的方法。但也存在一些并发症。渗漏是手术后最严重的并发症之一,会导致术后发病率和死亡率。目前对 LSG 术后渗漏的处理还没有达成共识。在我们的研究中,我们旨在介绍我们处理 LSG 渗漏的经验。患者和方法:回顾性分析 2010-2017 年间在一家三级大学医院接受 LSG 的患者。根据前瞻性记录数据分析了确诊为 LSG 管漏患者的人口统计学特征、内窥镜和手术干预、发病率和死亡率。结果显示在总共 510 例 LSG 患者中,有 11 例(2.15%)观察到漏液。其中 6 例(54%)被诊断为急性漏液,5 例为早期漏液。大多数患者(72%)在进行或不进行手术探查的情况下使用了支架。平均住院时间为 21 天。有 2 名患者死亡。结论:因此,LSG术后渗漏是一种需要多模式治疗的并发症。手术治疗结合内窥镜干预可提高成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Marmara Medical Journal
Marmara Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Marmara Medical Journal, Marmara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi tarafından yılda üç kere yayımlanan multidisipliner bir dergidir. Bu dergide tıbbın tüm alanlarına ait orijinal araştırma makaleleri, olgu sunumları ve derlemeler İngilizce veya Türkçe olarak yer alır.
期刊最新文献
The impact of right ventricular energy failure on the results of pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension Management of staple line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Single-center experience Effects of virtual reality usage on kappa angle, accommodation, pupil, depth perception, and examination of the relationship of these parameters with discomfort perception Combined Mustardé and Furnas type otoplasty with minimal conchal cartilage excision A case of granulomatosis of polyangiitis presenting with COVID-19 infection: False-positivity or co-existence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1