Bootstraps, redlines and wage-theft: using Monopoly to critically examine American wealth inequality

Matt Dingler
{"title":"Bootstraps, redlines and wage-theft: using Monopoly to critically examine American wealth inequality","authors":"Matt Dingler","doi":"10.1108/ssrp-10-2023-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeScholarship on America’s K-12 economics curriculum reveals an inattention to many harmful economic realities, specifically wealth inequality. Critics of the present curriculum posit that its emphasis on out-dated concepts and models ignores crucial elements of reality that impact economic interaction and identities. In response to the dominant economic paradigm and methods, this practitioner-focused paper discusses an economically pluralist, pedagogically critical approach to interrogating destructive economic realities. It details how three social studies classroom simulations based on the board game Monopoly may be integrated with certain informational texts to explore economic factors that contribute to America’s unique form of wealth inequality.Design/methodology/approachThis paper describes wealth inequality in America and rationalizes the need to make this social problem a focus of study in the secondary social studies classroom. First, I survey the present curricular apparatus of K-12 economics education and then argue for a pluralist approach that expands the curriculum’s dominant neoclassical paradigm. Connecting economic pluralism to critical citizen education, I draw upon emerging critical economic citizen education scholarship to explain attendant pedagogical and instructional approaches. The described lesson builds upon a tradition of Monopoly simulations, is rooted in critical citizen education pedagogy and aligns with Soroko’s (2023) critical economic literacy framework.FindingsThis paper progresses the curricular movement of economic pluralism through its critique of America’s current K-12 economics curriculum that does not focus on immediate, lived social problems. It further defines critical economics, citizenship and pedagogy, then details an instructional practice that employs critical disciplinary tools to investigate contributing factors of American wealth inequality.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the growing field of pluralist economic perspectives and pedagogies. Specifically, it enriches understanding of critical economics citizenship education by further defining attendant pedagogy and explaining Monopoly as an instructional tool for critical economics citizen education. Previous works have discussed Monopoly’s utility for teaching various concepts within the social studies disciplines. This simulation lesson is unique in its instructional approach that merges simulation experiences with certain informational texts to cultivate critical economic knowledge of American wealth inequality and critical economic skills for critiquing and transforming oppressive economic realities.","PeriodicalId":447901,"journal":{"name":"Social Studies Research and Practice","volume":"32 125","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Studies Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ssrp-10-2023-0058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeScholarship on America’s K-12 economics curriculum reveals an inattention to many harmful economic realities, specifically wealth inequality. Critics of the present curriculum posit that its emphasis on out-dated concepts and models ignores crucial elements of reality that impact economic interaction and identities. In response to the dominant economic paradigm and methods, this practitioner-focused paper discusses an economically pluralist, pedagogically critical approach to interrogating destructive economic realities. It details how three social studies classroom simulations based on the board game Monopoly may be integrated with certain informational texts to explore economic factors that contribute to America’s unique form of wealth inequality.Design/methodology/approachThis paper describes wealth inequality in America and rationalizes the need to make this social problem a focus of study in the secondary social studies classroom. First, I survey the present curricular apparatus of K-12 economics education and then argue for a pluralist approach that expands the curriculum’s dominant neoclassical paradigm. Connecting economic pluralism to critical citizen education, I draw upon emerging critical economic citizen education scholarship to explain attendant pedagogical and instructional approaches. The described lesson builds upon a tradition of Monopoly simulations, is rooted in critical citizen education pedagogy and aligns with Soroko’s (2023) critical economic literacy framework.FindingsThis paper progresses the curricular movement of economic pluralism through its critique of America’s current K-12 economics curriculum that does not focus on immediate, lived social problems. It further defines critical economics, citizenship and pedagogy, then details an instructional practice that employs critical disciplinary tools to investigate contributing factors of American wealth inequality.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the growing field of pluralist economic perspectives and pedagogies. Specifically, it enriches understanding of critical economics citizenship education by further defining attendant pedagogy and explaining Monopoly as an instructional tool for critical economics citizen education. Previous works have discussed Monopoly’s utility for teaching various concepts within the social studies disciplines. This simulation lesson is unique in its instructional approach that merges simulation experiences with certain informational texts to cultivate critical economic knowledge of American wealth inequality and critical economic skills for critiquing and transforming oppressive economic realities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引导、红线和工资盗窃:利用《大富翁》批判性地审视美国的财富不平等现象
目的关于美国 K-12 经济学课程的研究表明,该课程忽视了许多有害的经济现实,特别是财富不平等问题。目前课程的批评者认为,课程强调过时的概念和模型,忽视了影响经济互动和身份的关键现实因素。作为对主流经济学范式和方法的回应,这篇以实践者为中心的论文讨论了一种经济多元主义的、教学批判性的方法来审视破坏性的经济现实。本文详细介绍了如何将三个基于棋盘游戏《大富翁》的社会研究课堂模拟与某些信息课文相结合,以探讨造成美国独特形式的财富不平等的经济因素。本文描述了美国的财富不平等现象,并说明了将这一社会问题作为中学社会研究课堂研究重点的必要性。首先,我对目前 K-12 经济学教育的课程设置进行了调查,然后论证了一种多元主义方法,以扩展课程中占主导地位的新古典主义范式。将经济多元化与批判性公民教育联系起来,我借鉴了新兴的批判性经济公民教育学术研究,解释了相应的教学和指导方法。所描述的课程建立在大富翁模拟传统的基础上,植根于批判性公民教育教学法,并与索罗科(Soroko)(2023 年)的批判性经济素养框架相一致。它进一步定义了批判经济学、公民意识和教学法,然后详细介绍了一种采用批判性学科工具调查美国财富不平等成因的教学实践。具体而言,本文通过进一步定义相关教学法并解释《大富翁》作为批判经济学公民教育的教学工具,丰富了人们对批判经济学公民教育的理解。以前的著作曾讨论过《大富翁》在社会研究学科中教授各种概念的实用性。本模拟课程的独特之处在于其教学方法,它将模拟体验与某些信息文本相结合,以培养有关美国财富不平等的批判性经济知识以及批判和改变压迫性经济现实的批判性经济技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Where we are: reflecting on our use of critical mapping practices for spatial justice in teacher education “Is it a civics lesson?”: centering the local to encourage political engagement On teaching Holocaust geographies: supporting inquiry into space, persecution and civic action Learning about place from Indigenous Elders: self-study in social studies education Themed editorial: Social studies research and practice special issue: effective use of films in the social studies classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1