Renewable Energy Support Through Feed-in Tariffs: A Retrospective Stakeholder Analysis

IF 2 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1017/bca.2024.9
Majid Hashemi, Glenn Jenkins, Frank Milne
{"title":"Renewable Energy Support Through Feed-in Tariffs: A Retrospective Stakeholder Analysis","authors":"Majid Hashemi, Glenn Jenkins, Frank Milne","doi":"10.1017/bca.2024.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study develops a generalized evaluation framework that can be used to quantify the financial, economic, stakeholder, and environmental impacts of renewable energy support programs. The application of this framework is demonstrated by evaluating the feed-in tariff (FIT) program for solar distributed energy resources (DER) in Ontario, Canada. Our analysis reveals that Ontario’s FIT program has successfully promoted the adoption of solar DER across communities. However, the program has caused inequitable societal outcomes through a cross-subsidization with a present value of 9 CAD billion, paid for by the electricity consumer base for the benefit of only the 0.06 percent of electricity consumers who could install solar systems. The cost imposed on the Canadian economy ranges from 2.86 to 5.37 CAD billion, depending on the discount rate applied. The sensitivity analysis results indicate that the burden of this program on the Canadian economy would have been reduced by 50 percent if the program had been delayed and implemented in 2016 instead of 2010 due to the declining trend in solar system investment costs. The lessons from this analysis provide insights for designing future environmental and emission reduction policies.","PeriodicalId":45587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2024.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study develops a generalized evaluation framework that can be used to quantify the financial, economic, stakeholder, and environmental impacts of renewable energy support programs. The application of this framework is demonstrated by evaluating the feed-in tariff (FIT) program for solar distributed energy resources (DER) in Ontario, Canada. Our analysis reveals that Ontario’s FIT program has successfully promoted the adoption of solar DER across communities. However, the program has caused inequitable societal outcomes through a cross-subsidization with a present value of 9 CAD billion, paid for by the electricity consumer base for the benefit of only the 0.06 percent of electricity consumers who could install solar systems. The cost imposed on the Canadian economy ranges from 2.86 to 5.37 CAD billion, depending on the discount rate applied. The sensitivity analysis results indicate that the burden of this program on the Canadian economy would have been reduced by 50 percent if the program had been delayed and implemented in 2016 instead of 2010 due to the declining trend in solar system investment costs. The lessons from this analysis provide insights for designing future environmental and emission reduction policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过上网电价支持可再生能源:利益相关者回顾分析
本研究开发了一个通用评估框架,可用于量化可再生能源支持计划的财务、经济、利益相关者和环境影响。通过评估加拿大安大略省的太阳能分布式能源资源(DER)上网电价(FIT)计划,展示了该框架的应用。我们的分析表明,安大略省的 FIT 计划成功地促进了太阳能 DER 在各个社区的应用。然而,该计划通过交叉补贴造成了不公平的社会结果,交叉补贴的现值高达 90 亿加元,由电力消费者群体支付,受益者仅为 0.06% 可以安装太阳能系统的电力消费者。对加拿大经济造成的成本从 28.6 亿到 53.7 亿加元不等,取决于所采用的贴现率。敏感性分析结果表明,由于太阳能系统投资成本呈下降趋势,如果该计划推迟到 2016 年而不是 2010 年实施,对加拿大经济造成的负担将减少 50%。这项分析的经验教训为设计未来的环保和减排政策提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Renewable Energy Support Through Feed-in Tariffs: A Retrospective Stakeholder Analysis Do Opportunity Costs of Regulations Appropriately Benefit or Inappropriately Burden Disadvantaged Consumers? Monetizing Animal Welfare Impacts for Benefit–Cost Analysis Estimating Lost Dividends from Incomplete Energy Access Transitions Differences by Race and Ethnicity in Title IX’s Effect on Women’s Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1