Tracking Wall Characteristics of Necrotic Pancreatic Fluid Collections in Acute Pancreatitis on Serial Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography

Harsimran Bhatia, Joseph Johnson, Pallavi T., Pankaj Gupta, Ajay Gulati, J. Shah, A. Singh, V. Jearth, J. Samanta, H. Mandavdhare, Vishal Sharma, S. Sinha, U. Dutta, Rakesh Kocchar
{"title":"Tracking Wall Characteristics of Necrotic Pancreatic Fluid Collections in Acute Pancreatitis on Serial Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography","authors":"Harsimran Bhatia, Joseph Johnson, Pallavi T., Pankaj Gupta, Ajay Gulati, J. Shah, A. Singh, V. Jearth, J. Samanta, H. Mandavdhare, Vishal Sharma, S. Sinha, U. Dutta, Rakesh Kocchar","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1785683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Encapsulated pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) is a requisite for endoscopic drainage procedures. The 4-week threshold for defining walled-off necrosis does not capture the dynamic process of encapsulation. We aim to investigate the changes in the wall characteristics of PFC in acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) by comparing baseline contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) with follow-up CT scans.\n Methods This retrospective study comprised consecutive patients with ANP who underwent a baseline CECT within first 2 weeks and follow-up CECT in the third to fifth weeks of illness. Presence, extent, and encapsulation thickness (defined as enhancing wall around the collection) on baseline CECT were compared with follow-up CT (done in the third–fifth weeks of illness).\n Results Thirty patients (19 males and 11 females; mean age 41.5 ± 13.5 years) were included in the study. The mean time to first CECT was 10 ± 3.6 days. There were 58 collections. The most common site was the lesser sac (n = 29), followed by the left pararenal space (n = 15). At baseline CT, 52 (89.7%) collections had varying degree of encapsulation (15.3%, complete encapsulation). Complete encapsulation was seen in 52 and 82.6% collections in third and fourth week, respectively. All collections in fifth week and beyond were encapsulated. The wall was thicker on follow-up CECT scans (p < 0.01). The mean wall thickness was not significantly associated with the degree of encapsulation (p = 0.417). There was no significant association between the site and degree of encapsulation (p = 0.546).\n Conclusion Encapsulation is dynamic and collections may get “walled off” before 4 weeks. Walled-off collections should be defined based on imaging rather than a fixed 4-week revised Atlanta classification threshold.","PeriodicalId":506648,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1785683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Encapsulated pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) is a requisite for endoscopic drainage procedures. The 4-week threshold for defining walled-off necrosis does not capture the dynamic process of encapsulation. We aim to investigate the changes in the wall characteristics of PFC in acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) by comparing baseline contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) with follow-up CT scans. Methods This retrospective study comprised consecutive patients with ANP who underwent a baseline CECT within first 2 weeks and follow-up CECT in the third to fifth weeks of illness. Presence, extent, and encapsulation thickness (defined as enhancing wall around the collection) on baseline CECT were compared with follow-up CT (done in the third–fifth weeks of illness). Results Thirty patients (19 males and 11 females; mean age 41.5 ± 13.5 years) were included in the study. The mean time to first CECT was 10 ± 3.6 days. There were 58 collections. The most common site was the lesser sac (n = 29), followed by the left pararenal space (n = 15). At baseline CT, 52 (89.7%) collections had varying degree of encapsulation (15.3%, complete encapsulation). Complete encapsulation was seen in 52 and 82.6% collections in third and fourth week, respectively. All collections in fifth week and beyond were encapsulated. The wall was thicker on follow-up CECT scans (p < 0.01). The mean wall thickness was not significantly associated with the degree of encapsulation (p = 0.417). There was no significant association between the site and degree of encapsulation (p = 0.546). Conclusion Encapsulation is dynamic and collections may get “walled off” before 4 weeks. Walled-off collections should be defined based on imaging rather than a fixed 4-week revised Atlanta classification threshold.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连续对比增强计算机断层扫描显示急性胰腺炎坏死性胰液集聚的胰壁特征
背景包裹性胰液收集(PFC)是内镜引流手术的必要条件。定义贴壁坏死的 4 周阈值并不能捕捉到包裹的动态过程。我们旨在通过对比基线对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)和随访 CT 扫描,研究急性坏死性胰腺炎(ANP)中 PFC 壁特征的变化。方法 这项回顾性研究包括连续接受基线 CECT 扫描的 ANP 患者,他们在发病后两周内接受了基线 CECT 扫描,并在发病后第三至第五周接受了随访 CECT 扫描。将基线 CECT 与随访 CT(病程第三至第五周时进行)的存在、范围和包膜厚度(定义为增厚的集合体周围壁)进行比较。结果 研究共纳入 30 名患者(19 名男性,11 名女性;平均年龄为 41.5 ± 13.5 岁)。首次 CECT 的平均时间为 10 ± 3.6 天。共有 58 例采集。最常见的部位是小囊(29 例),其次是左肾旁间隙(15 例)。在基线 CT 上,52 个(89.7%)集合体有不同程度的包膜(15.3% 为完全包膜)。在第 3 周和第 4 周,分别有 52 个和 82.6% 的集合体出现完全包裹。第五周及以后的所有积液均被包裹。随访的 CECT 扫描结果显示管壁变厚(P < 0.01)。平均壁厚与包裹程度无明显关系(p = 0.417)。包膜部位与包膜程度无明显关联(p = 0.546)。结论 包膜是动态的,集合体可能会在 4 周前被 "包壁"。应根据影像学而不是固定的 4 周修订版亚特兰大分类阈值来定义 "壁关闭 "集合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Treatment of Sports-Related Meniscal Injuries Never Regret Trying Image-Guided Sclerotherapy in Orbital Low-Flow Malformation Diagnostic Imaging Performance of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Uterine Cervical Cancer Spontaneous Chest Wall Hernias: Intercostal Lung Hernia and Inverted Intercostal Hernia WhatsApp and Its Role in Teleradiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1