Estimating ski orientation using IMUs in alpine skiing

Chris Hummel, Andreas Huber, Peter Spitzenpfeil
{"title":"Estimating ski orientation using IMUs in alpine skiing","authors":"Chris Hummel, Andreas Huber, Peter Spitzenpfeil","doi":"10.36950/2024.3ciss004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ski-snow interaction is the essential component of alpine skiing. To understand how a skier manipulates his ski to turn, we need to develop methods to measure the orientation of the ski throughout a complete run. Recent studies tried to use IMUs to estimate edge angle (EA) during skiing.\nWe introduce and validate a method on how to calibrate and employ IMUs to precisely and accurately measure roll angles (RA) as a matter of changing orientation of the ski around its longitudinal axis in 3D space during skiing.\nStatic orientation measurements on an inclined plane perfectly correlate (r2 = 1) with 3D motion capturing: RMSE = 0.18° and 0.24° respectively. Bland Altman showed a mean bias of 0.23° (95% CI: -0.16°, 0.63°) and 0.21° (95% CI: -0.3°, 0.73°). Accuracy and drift tests against constant standardised rotational velocities showed no drift behaviour over time, but RA estimation accuracy is reduced with increasing angular velocities (SD @ ±300°/s: 0.57°, max. difference from average at ±300°/s: 2.7°). During skiing on a ski ergometer the comparison of maximum RA against Vicon showed a mean bias of 0.13° (95% CI: -0.86° to 1.1°).\nEven though ski ergometer skiing has a similar frequency and angular velocity profile like outdoor skiing, there are more rotational degrees of freedom in outdoor skiing. The foundation is provided in this paper. To understand how a skier manipulates the ski on snow and to understand RA and EA progression during a turn in detail, further research should validate the method in the field and additionally look into RA progression within individual turns.","PeriodicalId":508861,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","volume":"81 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.3ciss004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ski-snow interaction is the essential component of alpine skiing. To understand how a skier manipulates his ski to turn, we need to develop methods to measure the orientation of the ski throughout a complete run. Recent studies tried to use IMUs to estimate edge angle (EA) during skiing. We introduce and validate a method on how to calibrate and employ IMUs to precisely and accurately measure roll angles (RA) as a matter of changing orientation of the ski around its longitudinal axis in 3D space during skiing. Static orientation measurements on an inclined plane perfectly correlate (r2 = 1) with 3D motion capturing: RMSE = 0.18° and 0.24° respectively. Bland Altman showed a mean bias of 0.23° (95% CI: -0.16°, 0.63°) and 0.21° (95% CI: -0.3°, 0.73°). Accuracy and drift tests against constant standardised rotational velocities showed no drift behaviour over time, but RA estimation accuracy is reduced with increasing angular velocities (SD @ ±300°/s: 0.57°, max. difference from average at ±300°/s: 2.7°). During skiing on a ski ergometer the comparison of maximum RA against Vicon showed a mean bias of 0.13° (95% CI: -0.86° to 1.1°). Even though ski ergometer skiing has a similar frequency and angular velocity profile like outdoor skiing, there are more rotational degrees of freedom in outdoor skiing. The foundation is provided in this paper. To understand how a skier manipulates the ski on snow and to understand RA and EA progression during a turn in detail, further research should validate the method in the field and additionally look into RA progression within individual turns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在高山滑雪中使用 IMUs 估算滑雪板方向
滑雪板与雪的相互作用是高山滑雪的重要组成部分。为了了解滑雪者如何操纵滑雪板转弯,我们需要开发出测量滑雪板在整个滑行过程中方向的方法。我们介绍并验证了如何校准和使用 IMU 来精确测量滚动角(RA)的方法,这是滑雪过程中滑雪板围绕其纵轴在三维空间中改变方向的问题:RMSE = 0.18°和 0.24°。Bland Altman 显示平均偏差为 0.23°(95% CI:-0.16°, 0.63°)和 0.21°(95% CI:-0.3°, 0.73°)。针对恒定标准化旋转速度进行的精度和漂移测试表明,随着时间的推移没有漂移行为,但 RA 估计精度会随着角速度的增加而降低(±300°/秒时的 SD:0.57°,±300°/秒时与平均值的最大差异:2.7°)。在滑雪测力计上滑雪时,最大 RA 与 Vicon 的比较显示平均偏差为 0.13°(95% CI:-0.86° 至 1.1°)。本文提供了相关基础。要想了解滑雪者如何在雪地上操控滑雪板,并详细了解转弯过程中的 RA 和 EA 进展,进一步的研究应在现场对该方法进行验证,并对单个转弯过程中的 RA 进展进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress on Science and Skiing (ICSS) – Saalbach/Hinterglemm March 2023 Automatic gate-to-gate time recognition from audio recordings in slalom skiing using neural networks Identification of the optimal racing line for top male athletes on a segment of a World Cup downhill alpine ski slope using tracking data Heel riser height influence on kinematics and muscle activity of ski mountaineering – A field based study Development of world class ski performance: Similarities and differences in pathways to expertise for freeskiers and cross-country skiers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1