Vision and Metamorphopsia Outcomes of Macular Buckling for Foveoschisis Associated Macular Detachment in Highly Myopic Eyes

Qi Zhang, Xiujuan Zhao, Bingqian Liu, Shida Chen, Xia Huang, Qingxiu Wu, Jinlian Zhan, Lin Lu
{"title":"Vision and Metamorphopsia Outcomes of Macular Buckling for Foveoschisis Associated Macular Detachment in Highly Myopic Eyes","authors":"Qi Zhang, Xiujuan Zhao, Bingqian Liu, Shida Chen, Xia Huang, Qingxiu Wu, Jinlian Zhan, Lin Lu","doi":"10.1097/iae.0000000000004148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To assess the functional outcomes in visual acuity, metamorphopsia, and vision-related quality of life (VR-QOL) and to evaluate prognostic factors after macular buckling (MB) surgery in eyes with high myopia and foveoschisis (FS) associated macular detachment (MD).\n \n \n \n Thirty-nine eyes of 39 patients with FS associated MD underwent MB surgery were enrolled. Measured outcomes comprised best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), metamorphopsia, VR-QOL, axial length (AL), macular reattachment, and resolution of foveoschisis. Additionally, factors affecting final BCVA and metamorphopsia were analyzed.\n \n \n \n At 12 months postoperatively, 36 eyes (92.31%) achieved macular reattachment, 37 eyes (94.87%) achieved complete resolution of foveoshisis, and metamorphopsia diminished in 31 eyes (79.49%). LogMAR BCVAs at baseline and months 1, 3, 6 and 12 postoperatively were 0.62±0.35 (20/83), 0.65±0.3 (20/89), 0.59±0.31 (20/77), 0.54±0.31 (20/69) and 0.46±0.27 (20/57) (P < 0.001), respectively. Metamorphopsia scores by M-CHARTS were 1.36°±0.51°, 1.04°±0.51°, 0.74°±0.47°, 0.59°±0.47° and 0.13°±0.29° (P < 0.001). All VFQ-25 subscales demonstrated significant improvement postoperatively, with the exception of “general health” (P = 0.08) and “driving” (P = 0.111). Preoperative BCVA was an independent risk factor for postoperative BCVA at month 12 (r = 0.638, P < 0.001), and the preoperative M-score was an independent risk factor for postoperative M-score at month 12 (r = 0.187, P = 0.045).\n \n \n \n MB surgery significantly improved BCVA, metamorphopsia, and VR-QOL in patients with FS associated MD. Preoperative BCVA and metamorphopsia score were prognostic factors for postoperative BCVA and metamorphopsia score at month 12.\n","PeriodicalId":21178,"journal":{"name":"Retina","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000004148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the functional outcomes in visual acuity, metamorphopsia, and vision-related quality of life (VR-QOL) and to evaluate prognostic factors after macular buckling (MB) surgery in eyes with high myopia and foveoschisis (FS) associated macular detachment (MD). Thirty-nine eyes of 39 patients with FS associated MD underwent MB surgery were enrolled. Measured outcomes comprised best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), metamorphopsia, VR-QOL, axial length (AL), macular reattachment, and resolution of foveoschisis. Additionally, factors affecting final BCVA and metamorphopsia were analyzed. At 12 months postoperatively, 36 eyes (92.31%) achieved macular reattachment, 37 eyes (94.87%) achieved complete resolution of foveoshisis, and metamorphopsia diminished in 31 eyes (79.49%). LogMAR BCVAs at baseline and months 1, 3, 6 and 12 postoperatively were 0.62±0.35 (20/83), 0.65±0.3 (20/89), 0.59±0.31 (20/77), 0.54±0.31 (20/69) and 0.46±0.27 (20/57) (P < 0.001), respectively. Metamorphopsia scores by M-CHARTS were 1.36°±0.51°, 1.04°±0.51°, 0.74°±0.47°, 0.59°±0.47° and 0.13°±0.29° (P < 0.001). All VFQ-25 subscales demonstrated significant improvement postoperatively, with the exception of “general health” (P = 0.08) and “driving” (P = 0.111). Preoperative BCVA was an independent risk factor for postoperative BCVA at month 12 (r = 0.638, P < 0.001), and the preoperative M-score was an independent risk factor for postoperative M-score at month 12 (r = 0.187, P = 0.045). MB surgery significantly improved BCVA, metamorphopsia, and VR-QOL in patients with FS associated MD. Preoperative BCVA and metamorphopsia score were prognostic factors for postoperative BCVA and metamorphopsia score at month 12.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高度近视眼黄斑扣膜术治疗眼窝裂孔相关性黄斑脱离的视力和变性结果
目的:评估高度近视和眼窝裂孔(FS)伴黄斑脱离(MD)患者接受黄斑扣膜(MB)手术后在视力、变形和视力相关生活质量(VR-QOL)方面的功能性结果,并评估预后因素。 39名FS伴有MD的患者中有39只眼睛接受了黄斑扣带手术。测量结果包括最佳矫正视力 (BCVA)、变形、VR-QOL、轴向长度 (AL)、黄斑再粘连和眼窝裂解。此外,还分析了影响最终 BCVA 和变形的因素。 术后12个月时,36只眼睛(92.31%)实现了黄斑再接合,37只眼睛(94.87%)完全消除了眼窝裂孔,31只眼睛(79.49%)的变形视力减退。基线和术后第1、3、6和12个月的LogMAR BCVA分别为0.62±0.35(20/83)、0.65±0.3(20/89)、0.59±0.31(20/77)、0.54±0.31(20/69)和0.46±0.27(20/57)(P<0.001)。M-CHARTS 的变形评分分别为 1.36°±0.51°、1.04°±0.51°、0.74°±0.47°、0.59°±0.47° 和 0.13°±0.29°(P < 0.001)。除 "一般健康"(P = 0.08)和 "驾驶"(P = 0.111)外,所有 VFQ-25 分量表在术后均有显著改善。术前 BCVA 是术后第 12 个月 BCVA 的独立风险因素(r = 0.638,P < 0.001),术前 M 评分是术后第 12 个月 M 评分的独立风险因素(r = 0.187,P = 0.045)。 MB手术能明显改善FS伴发MD患者的BCVA、变异视力和VR-QOL。术前BCVA和变形评分是术后第12个月BCVA和变形评分的预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GENETIC ETIOLOGY AND CLINICAL FEATURES OF ACHROMATOPSIA IN JAPAN. IMAGING PREDICTORS OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR. FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH DELAYED DIAGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY VITREORETINAL LYMPHOMA. MICROVASCULAR CHANGES IN TREATMENT-NAÏVE NONEXUDATIVE MACULAR NEOVASCULARIZATION COMPLICATED BY EXUDATION. ORAL CURCUMIN TO REDUCE RISK OF PROLIFERATIVE VITREORETINOPATHY FOLLOWING RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1