A semi-automated software model to support AI ethics compliance assessment of an AI system guided by ethical principles of AI

Maria Assunta Cappelli, Giovanna Di Marzo Serugendo
{"title":"A semi-automated software model to support AI ethics compliance assessment of an AI system guided by ethical principles of AI","authors":"Maria Assunta Cappelli,&nbsp;Giovanna Di Marzo Serugendo","doi":"10.1007/s43681-024-00480-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Compliance with principles and guidelines for ethical AI has a significant impact on companies engaged in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Specifically, ethics is a broad concept that continuously evolves over time and across cultural and geographical boundaries. International organisations (IOs), individual states, and private groups, all have an interest in defining the concept of ethics of AI. IOs, as well as regional and national bodies, have issued many decisions on AI ethics. Developing a system that complies with the ethical framework poses a complex challenge for companies, and the consequences of not complying with ethical principles can have severe consequences, making compliance with these requirements a key issue for companies. Furthermore, there is a shortage of technical tools to ensure that such AI systems comply with ethical criteria. The scarcity of ethics compliance checking tools for AI, and the current focus on defining ethical guidelines for AI development, has led us to undertake a proposal consisting in a semi-automated software model to verify the ethical compliance of an AI system’s code. To implement this model, we focus on the following important aspects: (1) a literature review to identify existing ethical compliance systems, (2) a review of principles and guidelines for ethical AI to determine the international and European views regarding AI ethics, and (3) the identification of commonly accepted principles and sub-principles of AI. These elements served to inform (4) our proposal for the design of a semi-automated software for verifying the ethical compliance of AI systems both at design-time (ethics-by-design perspective) and afterwards on the resulting software.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 2","pages":"1357 - 1380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-024-00480-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-024-00480-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compliance with principles and guidelines for ethical AI has a significant impact on companies engaged in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Specifically, ethics is a broad concept that continuously evolves over time and across cultural and geographical boundaries. International organisations (IOs), individual states, and private groups, all have an interest in defining the concept of ethics of AI. IOs, as well as regional and national bodies, have issued many decisions on AI ethics. Developing a system that complies with the ethical framework poses a complex challenge for companies, and the consequences of not complying with ethical principles can have severe consequences, making compliance with these requirements a key issue for companies. Furthermore, there is a shortage of technical tools to ensure that such AI systems comply with ethical criteria. The scarcity of ethics compliance checking tools for AI, and the current focus on defining ethical guidelines for AI development, has led us to undertake a proposal consisting in a semi-automated software model to verify the ethical compliance of an AI system’s code. To implement this model, we focus on the following important aspects: (1) a literature review to identify existing ethical compliance systems, (2) a review of principles and guidelines for ethical AI to determine the international and European views regarding AI ethics, and (3) the identification of commonly accepted principles and sub-principles of AI. These elements served to inform (4) our proposal for the design of a semi-automated software for verifying the ethical compliance of AI systems both at design-time (ethics-by-design perspective) and afterwards on the resulting software.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
半自动化软件模型,支持以人工智能伦理原则为指导对人工智能系统进行人工智能伦理合规性评估
遵守道德人工智能的原则和指导方针对从事人工智能(AI)系统开发的公司具有重大影响。具体来说,道德是一个广泛的概念,随着时间的推移,跨越文化和地理的界限,不断发展。国际组织(IOs)、个别国家和私人团体都有兴趣定义人工智能的伦理概念。国际组织以及地区和国家机构已经发布了许多关于人工智能伦理的决定。开发一个符合道德框架的系统对公司来说是一个复杂的挑战,而不遵守道德原则的后果可能会产生严重的后果,因此遵守这些要求是公司的一个关键问题。此外,还缺乏技术工具来确保此类人工智能系统符合道德标准。人工智能的道德符合性检查工具的缺乏,以及目前对定义人工智能开发的道德准则的关注,使我们承担了一个由半自动化软件模型组成的提案,以验证人工智能系统代码的道德符合性。为了实现这一模型,我们重点关注以下重要方面:(1)文献综述,以确定现有的伦理合规体系;(2)伦理人工智能的原则和指导方针综述,以确定国际和欧洲对人工智能伦理的看法;(3)确定普遍接受的人工智能原则和子原则。这些元素有助于我们提出(4)设计一种半自动软件的建议,用于在设计时(从设计伦理的角度)和随后的结果软件中验证人工智能系统的道德合规性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond black-box medicine: a bioethical considerations for informed consent in AI-driven endoscopy Rectifying illusion: a Buddhist–Confucian framework for LLM hallucinations A dynamic contextual responsibility framework for evaluating large language models in socio-technical contexts Political fantasies of fairness: artificial intelligence, law, and the myth of sovereign reason A critical analysis of the ethical benefits and challenges related to the development and use of wearable AI devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1