Yield of MR-directed US for MRI-detected breast findings: how often can we avoid MR biopsy?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110174
Melissa Reichman , Xiaoxuan Chen , Annabel Lee , Julia Losner , Charlene Thomas , Janine Katzen
{"title":"Yield of MR-directed US for MRI-detected breast findings: how often can we avoid MR biopsy?","authors":"Melissa Reichman ,&nbsp;Xiaoxuan Chen ,&nbsp;Annabel Lee ,&nbsp;Julia Losner ,&nbsp;Charlene Thomas ,&nbsp;Janine Katzen","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the yield of MR-directed ultrasound for MRI detected breast findings.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 857 consecutive patients who had a breast MRI between January 2017–December 2020 and received a BI-RADS 4 assessment. Only exams recommended for MR-directed ultrasound were included in the study, yielding 765 patients. Findings were characterized by presence or absence of a sonographic correlate. Utilizing the electronic medical record, for those with a sonographic correlate, the size, location, and morphology were noted. Imaging guided (Ultrasound and MRI) pathology results as well as excisional pathology results were recorded. A multivariable logistical regression analysis was used to investigate the clinical utility of MR-directed ultrasound.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 1262 MRI-detected BI-RADS category 4 findings in 765 patients. Of the 1262 findings, MR-directed ultrasound was performed on 852 (68 %). Of these, 291/852 (34 %) had an ultrasound correlate, including 143/291 (49 %) benign lesions, 81/291 (28 %) malignant lesions, 16/291 (5 %) with high-risk pathology and 51/291 (18 %) unknown due to lost to follow-up. Of those findings with ultrasound correlates, 173/291 (59 %) represented masses, 69/291 (24 %) were regions of non-mass enhancement, 22/291 (7.6 %) were foci and 27/291 (9.3 %) fell into the category of other which included lymph node, cysts, and scar tissue. Masses were significantly more likely to be identified on MR-directed ultrasound (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001) compared to foci.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The yield of MR-directed ultrasound is significantly higher for masses, than foci and non-mass enhancement, which should be taken into consideration when recommending an MR-directed ultrasound.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124001049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the yield of MR-directed ultrasound for MRI detected breast findings.

Methods

This retrospective study included 857 consecutive patients who had a breast MRI between January 2017–December 2020 and received a BI-RADS 4 assessment. Only exams recommended for MR-directed ultrasound were included in the study, yielding 765 patients. Findings were characterized by presence or absence of a sonographic correlate. Utilizing the electronic medical record, for those with a sonographic correlate, the size, location, and morphology were noted. Imaging guided (Ultrasound and MRI) pathology results as well as excisional pathology results were recorded. A multivariable logistical regression analysis was used to investigate the clinical utility of MR-directed ultrasound.

Results

There were 1262 MRI-detected BI-RADS category 4 findings in 765 patients. Of the 1262 findings, MR-directed ultrasound was performed on 852 (68 %). Of these, 291/852 (34 %) had an ultrasound correlate, including 143/291 (49 %) benign lesions, 81/291 (28 %) malignant lesions, 16/291 (5 %) with high-risk pathology and 51/291 (18 %) unknown due to lost to follow-up. Of those findings with ultrasound correlates, 173/291 (59 %) represented masses, 69/291 (24 %) were regions of non-mass enhancement, 22/291 (7.6 %) were foci and 27/291 (9.3 %) fell into the category of other which included lymph node, cysts, and scar tissue. Masses were significantly more likely to be identified on MR-directed ultrasound (p < 0.0001) compared to foci.

Conclusion

The yield of MR-directed ultrasound is significantly higher for masses, than foci and non-mass enhancement, which should be taken into consideration when recommending an MR-directed ultrasound.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对磁共振成像检测到的乳腺结果进行磁共振定向 US 的收益率:多长时间可以避免磁共振活检?
目的评估磁共振成像检测到的乳腺结果的磁共振定向超声检查率。方法这项回顾性研究纳入了在 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受乳腺磁共振成像检查并接受 BI-RADS 4 评估的 857 名连续患者。只有建议进行磁共振引导超声检查的患者才被纳入研究,共纳入 765 名患者。检查结果以是否存在超声相关性为特征。利用电子病历,对有声像图相关结果的患者记录其大小、位置和形态。记录了成像引导(超声波和核磁共振成像)病理结果以及切除病理结果。结果765名患者中共有1262个MRI检测到的BI-RADS第4类结果。在这 1262 项检查结果中,有 852 项(68%)进行了磁共振定向超声检查。其中,291/852(34%)有超声相关性,包括143/291(49%)个良性病变、81/291(28%)个恶性病变、16/291(5%)个高危病变和51/291(18%)个因失去随访而未知的病变。在有超声相关性的检查结果中,173/291(59%)例为肿块,69/291(24%)例为非肿块强化区域,22/291(7.6%)例为病灶,27/291(9.3%)例为其他类别,包括淋巴结、囊肿和疤痕组织。结论 MR 导向超声检查发现肿块的几率明显高于病灶和非肿块增强,在建议进行 MR 导向超声检查时应考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
期刊最新文献
Women in Radiology Education (WIRED): An actionable step towards closing the gender gap in radiology. Contents Heart lung axis in acute pulmonary embolism: Role of CT in risk stratification Clinical experience on the limited role of ultrasound for breast cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carriers aged 30–39 years Factors affecting mammogram breast cancer surveillance effectiveness in the ipsilateral and contralateral breast
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1