Acceptability of Chinese Medicine Information Sharing in electronic Health Record Sharing System (eHRSS) in Chinese medicine practitioners: A mixed-method study
Junjie Huang , Sze Chai Chan , Fung Yu Mak , Yuet Yan Wong , Corey Lam , Kam Fung Chung , Luva Lui , Clement SK Cheung , Wing Nam Wong , Ngai Tseung Cheung , Martin CS Wong
{"title":"Acceptability of Chinese Medicine Information Sharing in electronic Health Record Sharing System (eHRSS) in Chinese medicine practitioners: A mixed-method study","authors":"Junjie Huang , Sze Chai Chan , Fung Yu Mak , Yuet Yan Wong , Corey Lam , Kam Fung Chung , Luva Lui , Clement SK Cheung , Wing Nam Wong , Ngai Tseung Cheung , Martin CS Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Background and objectives</em> The Stage Two Development of eHRSS aimed to broaden the scope of sharable data and advance technical capability for sharing of Chinese Medicine (CM) information. This study aims to evaluate the adoption level and perceived difficulties of Chinese medicine practitioners (CMPs) towards EC Connect, and its impact on CM services.</p><p><em>Methods</em> All registered or listed CMPs were recruited in study 1. Descriptive analysis included age, gender, socioeconomic status, and past medical history was performed with multiple logistic regression models. In-depth interviews were conducted among EC Connect Users and Healthcare Providers (HCP) who upload information of Chinese Medicine to eHRSS.</p><p><em>Results</em> A total of 420 participants were included in this study. The majority of the respondents were in the 31–40 years age group (<em>N</em> = 133, 31.7 %) and practicing in private clinic (<em>N</em> = 311, 74.0 %). Respondents whom agreed that the expansion of sharing scope would be helpful to various stakeholders were 5 times more likely to be interested in joining eHRSS (aOR = 5.01, 95 % CI = 2.73–9.20, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Study 2 found that eHRSS allowed CMPs to share and record medical data, and to access patients’ western medical records while inconsistency of medical systems between Western and Chinese medicine should be considered.</p><p>Conclusions We found that accessing and sharing medical records was important to CMPs. eHRSS helped to facilitate more accurate association between Western and Chinese medical doctors, while more efforts were needed to increase the acknowledgement among the general public.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 2","pages":"Article 100869"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives The Stage Two Development of eHRSS aimed to broaden the scope of sharable data and advance technical capability for sharing of Chinese Medicine (CM) information. This study aims to evaluate the adoption level and perceived difficulties of Chinese medicine practitioners (CMPs) towards EC Connect, and its impact on CM services.
Methods All registered or listed CMPs were recruited in study 1. Descriptive analysis included age, gender, socioeconomic status, and past medical history was performed with multiple logistic regression models. In-depth interviews were conducted among EC Connect Users and Healthcare Providers (HCP) who upload information of Chinese Medicine to eHRSS.
Results A total of 420 participants were included in this study. The majority of the respondents were in the 31–40 years age group (N = 133, 31.7 %) and practicing in private clinic (N = 311, 74.0 %). Respondents whom agreed that the expansion of sharing scope would be helpful to various stakeholders were 5 times more likely to be interested in joining eHRSS (aOR = 5.01, 95 % CI = 2.73–9.20, p < 0.001). Study 2 found that eHRSS allowed CMPs to share and record medical data, and to access patients’ western medical records while inconsistency of medical systems between Western and Chinese medicine should be considered.
Conclusions We found that accessing and sharing medical records was important to CMPs. eHRSS helped to facilitate more accurate association between Western and Chinese medical doctors, while more efforts were needed to increase the acknowledgement among the general public.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics