Pain after oocyte retrieval in women with endometriosis undergoing fertility preservation or IVF

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive biomedicine online Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104100
Maha Eid , Adrien Lemoine , Lena Bardet , Lise Selleret , Sophie Stout , Emmanuelle Mathieu d'Argent , Anna Ly , Nathalie Sermondade , Cyril Touboul , Charlotte Dupont , Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet , Kamila Kolanska
{"title":"Pain after oocyte retrieval in women with endometriosis undergoing fertility preservation or IVF","authors":"Maha Eid ,&nbsp;Adrien Lemoine ,&nbsp;Lena Bardet ,&nbsp;Lise Selleret ,&nbsp;Sophie Stout ,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Mathieu d'Argent ,&nbsp;Anna Ly ,&nbsp;Nathalie Sermondade ,&nbsp;Cyril Touboul ,&nbsp;Charlotte Dupont ,&nbsp;Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet ,&nbsp;Kamila Kolanska","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Do women with endometriosis undergoing oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation experience the same level of pain as women undergoing oocyte retrieval for IVF?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study included 796 cycles in women with endometriosis undergoing oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation (<em>n</em> = 401) or IVF (<em>n</em> = 395) between January 2020 and October 2022. Post-operative pain assessments were compared between the two groups using a numeric rating scale (NRS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Women in the fertility preservation group were younger (32.1 ± 4.2 years versus 35.1 ± 4.1 years; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), had a lower body mass index (22.8 ± 3.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> versus 24.6 ± 4.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and had a lower concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (1.8 ± 1.5 ng/ml versus 2.15 ± 2.11 ng/ml; <em>P</em> = 0.026) in comparison with women in the IVF group. The oestrogen concentration on the day of ovulation trigger was higher in women in the fertility preservation group (2188 ± 1152 pg/ml versus 2081 ± 995 pg/ml; <em>P</em> = 0.004), and the prevalence rates of adenomyosis and digestive endometrial lesions were lower in women in the fertility preservation group (14% versus 29%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; 16% versus 25%, <em>P</em> = 0.003, respectively) compared with women in the IVF group. After oocyte puncture, more women in the fertility preservation group had an NRS pain score &gt;3 (moderate to severe pain) compared with women in the IVF group (20% versus 14%; <em>P</em> = 0.018). The progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol was identified as an independent predictive factor of greater post-operative pain (adjusted OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.06–5.15; <em>P</em> = 0.039).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Women with endometriosis undergoing fertility preservation reported more intense post-operative pain in the recovery room than women undergoing IVF. The PPOS protocol was an independent risk factor of intense pain (NRS pain score &gt;3) in women with endometriosis, but further studies are needed to confirm this result.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":"49 3","pages":"Article 104100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147264832400289X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research question

Do women with endometriosis undergoing oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation experience the same level of pain as women undergoing oocyte retrieval for IVF?

Design

This retrospective cohort study included 796 cycles in women with endometriosis undergoing oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation (n = 401) or IVF (n = 395) between January 2020 and October 2022. Post-operative pain assessments were compared between the two groups using a numeric rating scale (NRS).

Results

Women in the fertility preservation group were younger (32.1 ± 4.2 years versus 35.1 ± 4.1 years; P < 0.001), had a lower body mass index (22.8 ± 3.9 kg/m2 versus 24.6 ± 4.4 kg/m2; P < 0.001) and had a lower concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (1.8 ± 1.5 ng/ml versus 2.15 ± 2.11 ng/ml; P = 0.026) in comparison with women in the IVF group. The oestrogen concentration on the day of ovulation trigger was higher in women in the fertility preservation group (2188 ± 1152 pg/ml versus 2081 ± 995 pg/ml; P = 0.004), and the prevalence rates of adenomyosis and digestive endometrial lesions were lower in women in the fertility preservation group (14% versus 29%, P < 0.001; 16% versus 25%, P = 0.003, respectively) compared with women in the IVF group. After oocyte puncture, more women in the fertility preservation group had an NRS pain score >3 (moderate to severe pain) compared with women in the IVF group (20% versus 14%; P = 0.018). The progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol was identified as an independent predictive factor of greater post-operative pain (adjusted OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.06–5.15; P = 0.039).

Conclusion

Women with endometriosis undergoing fertility preservation reported more intense post-operative pain in the recovery room than women undergoing IVF. The PPOS protocol was an independent risk factor of intense pain (NRS pain score >3) in women with endometriosis, but further studies are needed to confirm this result.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有子宫内膜异位症、接受生育力保存或体外受精的妇女取卵后的疼痛
研究问题为保留生育力而进行取卵术的子宫内膜异位症女性与为体外受精而进行取卵术的女性是否会经历相同程度的疼痛? 设计这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2020年1月至2022年10月期间为保留生育力而进行取卵术(401人)或体外受精(395人)的796个周期的子宫内膜异位症女性。使用数字评分量表(NRS)对两组患者的术后疼痛评估进行比较。结果保留生育力组的女性更年轻(32.1 ± 4.2 岁对 35.1 ± 4.1 岁;P < 0.001),体重指数较低(22.8 ± 3.9 kg/m2 对 24.6 ± 4.4 kg/m2;P <;0.001),抗缪勒氏管激素浓度较低(1.8 ± 1.5 ng/ml 对 2.15 ± 2.11 ng/ml;P = 0.026)。与试管婴儿组相比,生育力保存组妇女在排卵触发日的雌激素浓度更高(2188 ± 1152 pg/ml 对 2081 ± 995 pg/ml;P = 0.004),腺肌症和消化道子宫内膜病变的发生率也更低(分别为 14% 对 29%,P < 0.001;16% 对 25%,P = 0.003)。卵母细胞穿刺后,NRS 疼痛评分为 3 分(中度至重度疼痛)的生育力保存组女性多于试管婴儿组女性(20% 对 14%;P = 0.018)。孕激素刺激卵巢(PPOS)方案是导致术后疼痛加剧的独立预测因素(调整后 OR 2.30,95% CI 1.06-5.15;P = 0.039)。PPOS方案是导致子宫内膜异位症妇女剧烈疼痛(NRS疼痛评分3分)的一个独立风险因素,但这一结果还需要进一步研究证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive biomedicine online
Reproductive biomedicine online 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients. Context: The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.
期刊最新文献
Comparative proteomic analysis of receptive and non-receptive endometria-derived uterine fluid suggests a panel for endometrial receptivity assessment Excessive KLF2 impairs mesenchymal–epithelial transition efficiency and adhesion in endometrial stromal cells via AKT phosphorylation Factors influencing the rate of anti-Müllerian hormone decline: a retrospective study of 4245 infertile women Impact of native language on the pursuit of fertility care Towards a universal rapid warming protocol for cryopreserved human ovarian tissue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1