Assessment of PSA responses and changes in the rate of tumor growth (g-rate) with immune checkpoint inhibitors in US Veterans with prostate cancer

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Seminars in oncology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.04.002
{"title":"Assessment of PSA responses and changes in the rate of tumor growth (g-rate) with immune checkpoint inhibitors in US Veterans with prostate cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>We examined data from US Veterans with prostate cancer<span> (PC) to assess disease response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as </span></span>monotherapy<span> or combined with abiraterone or </span></span>enzalutamide to assess ICI efficacy in the real-world. We queried the VA corporate data warehouse (CDW) to identify Veterans with a diagnosis of PC who received ICI for any malignancy and had ≥1 PSA measurement while receiving ICI. To evaluate ICI monotherapy, we restricted analysis to Veterans who had not received LHRH agonists/antagonists, PC-directed medical therapy, or radiation/extirpative surgery of the bladder/prostate within and preceding the duration of ICI administration. For ICI combination analysis, we identified Veterans who received abiraterone or enzalutamide for PC while on ICI. We calculated rates of tumor (PSA) growth (</span><strong><em>g</em></strong>-rates), comparing them to a 1:2 matched reference cohort. We identified 787 Veterans with PC and ≥1 PSA measurement while receiving an ICI. Median duration of ICI therapy was 155 days. 223 Veterans received ICI monotherapy, with only 17(8%) having a reduction in PSA (median decline = 43%). 12 (5%) had PSA declines &gt;30% (PSA30) which included 6 (3%) who had PSA reductions greater than 50% (PSA50). Median <strong><em>g</em></strong>-rates for ICI plus abiraterone (n = 20) or enzalutamide (n = 31) were 0.000689/d<sup>−1</sup> and 0.002819/d<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, and were statistically insignificant compared to <strong><em>g</em></strong>-rates of matched cohorts receiving abiraterone (<strong><em>g</em></strong> = 0.000925/d<sup>−1</sup>, <em>P</em> = 0.73) or enzalutamide (<strong><em>g</em></strong> = 0.001929/d<sup>−1</sup>, <em>P</em><span> = 0.58) alone. Our data align with clinical trial data in PC, demonstrating limited benefit from ICI monotherapy and predicting no survival benefit from simultaneous abiraterone or enzalutamide with an ICI using </span><strong><em>g</em></strong>-rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009377542400037X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined data from US Veterans with prostate cancer (PC) to assess disease response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as monotherapy or combined with abiraterone or enzalutamide to assess ICI efficacy in the real-world. We queried the VA corporate data warehouse (CDW) to identify Veterans with a diagnosis of PC who received ICI for any malignancy and had ≥1 PSA measurement while receiving ICI. To evaluate ICI monotherapy, we restricted analysis to Veterans who had not received LHRH agonists/antagonists, PC-directed medical therapy, or radiation/extirpative surgery of the bladder/prostate within and preceding the duration of ICI administration. For ICI combination analysis, we identified Veterans who received abiraterone or enzalutamide for PC while on ICI. We calculated rates of tumor (PSA) growth (g-rates), comparing them to a 1:2 matched reference cohort. We identified 787 Veterans with PC and ≥1 PSA measurement while receiving an ICI. Median duration of ICI therapy was 155 days. 223 Veterans received ICI monotherapy, with only 17(8%) having a reduction in PSA (median decline = 43%). 12 (5%) had PSA declines >30% (PSA30) which included 6 (3%) who had PSA reductions greater than 50% (PSA50). Median g-rates for ICI plus abiraterone (n = 20) or enzalutamide (n = 31) were 0.000689/d−1 and 0.002819/d−1, respectively, and were statistically insignificant compared to g-rates of matched cohorts receiving abiraterone (g = 0.000925/d−1, P = 0.73) or enzalutamide (g = 0.001929/d−1, P = 0.58) alone. Our data align with clinical trial data in PC, demonstrating limited benefit from ICI monotherapy and predicting no survival benefit from simultaneous abiraterone or enzalutamide with an ICI using g-rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估美国退伍军人前列腺癌患者对免疫检查点抑制剂的 PSA 反应和肿瘤生长率的变化
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(PD1/PDL1 抑制剂;ICI)治疗前列腺癌(PC)的价值有限。我们研究了患有前列腺癌的美国退伍军人的数据,以评估他们对 ICIs 单药治疗或与阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺联合治疗的疾病反应。我们将结果与参考数据集进行了比较,以评估 ICI 在现实世界中的疗效。方法:我们查询了退伍军人事务部的企业数据仓库 (CDW),以确定诊断为 PC 的退伍军人,这些退伍军人因任何恶性肿瘤接受过 ICI 治疗,且在接受 ICI 治疗期间 PSA 测量次数≥ 1 次。为评估 ICI 单药治疗,我们将分析对象限定为在接受 ICI 治疗期间及之前未接受过 LHRH 激动剂/拮抗剂、PC 导向药物治疗或膀胱/前列腺放射/外切手术的退伍军人。对于 ICI 组合分析,我们确定了在服用 ICI 期间接受阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺治疗 PC 的退伍军人。我们计算了肿瘤(PSA)生长率(g-rates),并将其与 1:2 匹配的参照队列进行了比较。结果:我们发现了 787 名退伍军人在接受 ICI 治疗期间患有 PC 且 PSA 测量次数≥ 1 次。ICI 治疗的中位持续时间为 155 天。223 名退伍军人接受了 ICI 单药治疗,其中只有 17 人(8%)的 PSA 有所下降(中位数降幅=43%)。12人(5%)的PSA下降幅度大于30%(PSA30),其中6人(3%)的PSA下降幅度大于50%(PSA50)。ICI 加阿比特龙(n=20)或恩扎鲁胺(n=31)的中位 g 比率分别为 0.000689/d -1 和 0.002819/d-1,与单独接受阿比特龙(g=0.000925/d-1,p=0.73)或恩扎鲁胺(g=0.001929/d-1,p=0.58)的匹配队列的 g 比率相比,统计学上并不显著。结论我们的数据与PC的临床试验数据相吻合,结果表明ICI单药治疗的获益有限,而使用g-rate预测阿比特龙或恩扎鲁胺与ICI同时用药不会带来生存获益。我们证明了估算g-率和我们的参考数据库在解决具有挑战性的临床问题和辅助药物开发方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in oncology
Seminars in oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Outside front cover Masthead Editorial Board Real-world experience with CDK4-6 inhibition in the old and oldest old with a diagnosis of breast cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1