Development of an indirect measurement method for the Contact Tube to Workpiece Distance (CTDW) in the Direct Energy Deposition – Arc (DED-ARC) process for different arc types
{"title":"Development of an indirect measurement method for the Contact Tube to Workpiece Distance (CTDW) in the Direct Energy Deposition – Arc (DED-ARC) process for different arc types","authors":"M. Rohe, M. Knester, J. Hildebrand, J.P. Bergmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jajp.2024.100228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During the layer-by-layer build-up in the Direct Energy Deposition (DED) - Arc additive manufacturing (AM) process, the distance between the contact tube and the workpiece, effectively the welded layer, changes. Since the weld paths are predefined by the path planning software, a constant Contact Tube to Workpiece Distance (CTWD) and weld bead height is assumed. However, even small changes in geometry, such as crossovers of weld paths, result in higher weld beads than assumed. Similarly, an incorrectly assumed bead height as input to the path planning will result in a change in the CTWD. The sum of the deviations of the real weld geometries from the assumed ones in the path planning can greatly influence the CTWD. This implies that the dimensional accuracy may be significantly compromised. This research presents an approach for a general indirect measurement method using the welding current to obtain the CTWD during the actual welding process. A real-time process control method is implemented and validated using the mechanically controlled short arc and the pulsed arc process. Varying process parameters are used to validate the general applicability for a specific material. For the mechanically controlled short arc process, the model underestimates the measured CTWD by a mean error of 3.4 mm. The pulse process is overestimated by a mean error of 2.2 mm. The standard deviation for the pulse process with 1.3 mm is slightly smaller than for the short arc process with 1.7 mm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Joining Processes","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100228"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266633092400044X/pdfft?md5=2f6040ed480623a7ee1554ff6ca1cfd7&pid=1-s2.0-S266633092400044X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Joining Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266633092400044X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During the layer-by-layer build-up in the Direct Energy Deposition (DED) - Arc additive manufacturing (AM) process, the distance between the contact tube and the workpiece, effectively the welded layer, changes. Since the weld paths are predefined by the path planning software, a constant Contact Tube to Workpiece Distance (CTWD) and weld bead height is assumed. However, even small changes in geometry, such as crossovers of weld paths, result in higher weld beads than assumed. Similarly, an incorrectly assumed bead height as input to the path planning will result in a change in the CTWD. The sum of the deviations of the real weld geometries from the assumed ones in the path planning can greatly influence the CTWD. This implies that the dimensional accuracy may be significantly compromised. This research presents an approach for a general indirect measurement method using the welding current to obtain the CTWD during the actual welding process. A real-time process control method is implemented and validated using the mechanically controlled short arc and the pulsed arc process. Varying process parameters are used to validate the general applicability for a specific material. For the mechanically controlled short arc process, the model underestimates the measured CTWD by a mean error of 3.4 mm. The pulse process is overestimated by a mean error of 2.2 mm. The standard deviation for the pulse process with 1.3 mm is slightly smaller than for the short arc process with 1.7 mm.