Validación externa de la escala Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiology Treatment (EFFECT) de predicción de mortalidad en pacientes que ingresan por insuficiencia cardiaca agudizada en Álava, España

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista clinica espanola Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rce.2024.04.008
S. Goya-Lirio , M. Hernando-Llorens , S. García de Garayo-Díaz , J. Regalado-de Los Cobos
{"title":"Validación externa de la escala Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiology Treatment (EFFECT) de predicción de mortalidad en pacientes que ingresan por insuficiencia cardiaca agudizada en Álava, España","authors":"S. Goya-Lirio ,&nbsp;M. Hernando-Llorens ,&nbsp;S. García de Garayo-Díaz ,&nbsp;J. Regalado-de Los Cobos","doi":"10.1016/j.rce.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To validate the EFFECT (Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment) scales, which predict mortality at 1 month and 1 year after admission, in a defined cohort of patients admitted to the Araba University Hospital (HUA) with a diagnosis of acutely decompensated heart failure.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>External validation study of a predictive model, in a retrospective cohort of patients admitted between October 1, 2020 and September 30, 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 550 patients were included. The two scales demonstrated good overall discriminatory ability in our series, with an area under ROC (0.755 y 0.756) and values in Brier score (0.094 y 0.194) similar to the original series. Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration plots and was also adequate. All this despite the fact that significant differences were observed in many clinical characteristics between our series and the original one.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The EFFECT scales showed good predictive ability and transportability. The one-month prediction scale was also useful for predicting mortality at one year. For both time periods, mortality was similar in the groups established in the original as low and very low risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21223,"journal":{"name":"Revista clinica espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clinica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256524000870","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To validate the EFFECT (Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment) scales, which predict mortality at 1 month and 1 year after admission, in a defined cohort of patients admitted to the Araba University Hospital (HUA) with a diagnosis of acutely decompensated heart failure.

Method

External validation study of a predictive model, in a retrospective cohort of patients admitted between October 1, 2020 and September 30, 2021.

Results

A total of 550 patients were included. The two scales demonstrated good overall discriminatory ability in our series, with an area under ROC (0.755 y 0.756) and values in Brier score (0.094 y 0.194) similar to the original series. Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration plots and was also adequate. All this despite the fact that significant differences were observed in many clinical characteristics between our series and the original one.

Conclusions

The EFFECT scales showed good predictive ability and transportability. The one-month prediction scale was also useful for predicting mortality at one year. For both time periods, mortality was similar in the groups established in the original as low and very low risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙阿拉瓦地区用于预测急性心力衰竭住院患者死亡率的有效心脏病治疗强化反馈量表(EFFECT)的外部验证。
方法 对2020年10月1日至2021年9月30日期间入院的患者进行回顾性队列研究,对预测模型进行外部验证。结果 共纳入550名患者。在我们的系列研究中,这两个量表表现出良好的整体判别能力,ROC下面积(0.755 y 0.756)和Brier评分值(0.094 y 0.194)与原始系列相似。使用 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验和校准图对校准进行了评估,结果也是适当的。结论EFFECT量表显示出良好的预测能力和可移植性。结论EFFECT量表显示出良好的预测能力和可移植性,一个月的预测量表对预测一年的死亡率也很有用。在这两个时间段内,在最初确定的低风险组和极低风险组中,死亡率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista clinica espanola
Revista clinica espanola 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
73
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Revista Clínica Española published its first issue in 1940 and is the body of expression of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI). The journal fully endorses the goals of updating knowledge and facilitating the acquisition of key developments in internal medicine applied to clinical practice. Revista Clínica Española is subject to a thorough double blind review of the received articles written in Spanish or English. Nine issues are published each year, including mostly originals, reviews and consensus documents.
期刊最新文献
Espectro etiológico y desafíos diagnósticos de la fiebre de corta duración en Bengala Occidental (India): un estudio transversal en un centro de atención terciaria Respuesta a la carta al Director sobre «Prevalencia de anticuerpos neutralizantes frente al SARS-CoV-2 inducidos tras 2 dosis de vacuna BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) en trabajadores sanitarios» Tratamiento anticoagulante oral en la fibrilación auricular: AFIRMA, el estudio de vida real realizado mediante procesamiento de lenguaje natural y aprendizaje automático Prevalencia y características de la anemia en personas con diabetes mellitus de 50 años o más en un área sanitaria de Cádiz (España) E-consulta entre Atención Primaria y Medicina Interna: implementación, accesibilidad, beneficios e implicaciones
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1