Compound Flooding Potential from the Joint Occurrence of Precipitation and Storm Surge in the Qiantang Estuary, China

Yanjuan Wu, Ivan D. Haigh, Chao Gao, Luke J. Jenkins, Joshua Green, Robert Jane, Yu Xu, Hengzhi Hu, Naicheng Wu
{"title":"Compound Flooding Potential from the Joint Occurrence of Precipitation and Storm Surge in the Qiantang Estuary, China","authors":"Yanjuan Wu, Ivan D. Haigh, Chao Gao, Luke J. Jenkins, Joshua Green, Robert Jane, Yu Xu, Hengzhi Hu, Naicheng Wu","doi":"10.1175/jhm-d-23-0102.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn coastal regions, compound flooding, driven by multiple flood hazard sources, can cause greater damage than when the flood drivers occur in isolation. This study focuses on compound flooding from extreme precipitation and storm surge in China’s Qiantang Estuary. We quantify the potential of compound flooding by measuring bivariate joint statistical dependence and joint return period (JRP). We find a significant positive dependence between the two flood drivers considered, as indicated by Kendall’s rank correlation coefficients. Compound events occur frequently, with an average of 2.65 events per year from 1979 to 2018, highlighting the significant concern of compound flooding for this estuary. Using a copula model, we demonstrate that considering the dependence between the two flood drivers shortens the JRP of compound flooding compared to the JRP assuming total independence. For a 1-in-10-yr precipitation event and 1-in-10-yr storm surge event, the JRP is 1 in 100 years when assuming total independence. However, it decreases to 1 in 32.44 years when considering their dependence. Ignoring the dependence between flood drivers can lead to an increase in the JRP of compound events, resulting in an underestimation of the overall flood risk. Our analysis reveals a strong link between the weather patterns creating compound events and extreme storm surge only events with tropical cyclone activity. Additionally, the extreme precipitation only events were found to be connected with the frontal system of the East Asian summer monsoon. This study highlights the importance of considering the dependence between multiple flood drivers associated with certain types of the same weather systems when assessing the flood risk in coastal regions.","PeriodicalId":503314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-23-0102.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In coastal regions, compound flooding, driven by multiple flood hazard sources, can cause greater damage than when the flood drivers occur in isolation. This study focuses on compound flooding from extreme precipitation and storm surge in China’s Qiantang Estuary. We quantify the potential of compound flooding by measuring bivariate joint statistical dependence and joint return period (JRP). We find a significant positive dependence between the two flood drivers considered, as indicated by Kendall’s rank correlation coefficients. Compound events occur frequently, with an average of 2.65 events per year from 1979 to 2018, highlighting the significant concern of compound flooding for this estuary. Using a copula model, we demonstrate that considering the dependence between the two flood drivers shortens the JRP of compound flooding compared to the JRP assuming total independence. For a 1-in-10-yr precipitation event and 1-in-10-yr storm surge event, the JRP is 1 in 100 years when assuming total independence. However, it decreases to 1 in 32.44 years when considering their dependence. Ignoring the dependence between flood drivers can lead to an increase in the JRP of compound events, resulting in an underestimation of the overall flood risk. Our analysis reveals a strong link between the weather patterns creating compound events and extreme storm surge only events with tropical cyclone activity. Additionally, the extreme precipitation only events were found to be connected with the frontal system of the East Asian summer monsoon. This study highlights the importance of considering the dependence between multiple flood drivers associated with certain types of the same weather systems when assessing the flood risk in coastal regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国钱塘江口降水和风暴潮共同作用的复合洪水潜力
在沿海地区,由多种洪水灾害源引发的复合洪水所造成的损失可能比单独引发的洪水造成的损失更大。本研究的重点是中国钱塘江口极端降水和风暴潮引发的复合洪水。我们通过测量双变量联合统计依赖性和联合回归期(JRP)来量化复合洪水的潜力。根据肯德尔秩相关系数,我们发现所考虑的两种洪水驱动因素之间存在明显的正相关关系。复合事件频繁发生,从 1979 年到 2018 年,平均每年发生 2.65 次,凸显了复合洪水对该河口的重大影响。利用共轭模型,我们证明,与假定完全独立的 JRP 相比,考虑两个洪水驱动因素之间的依赖性可缩短复合洪水的 JRP。对于 10 年一遇的降水事件和 10 年一遇的风暴潮事件,假定完全独立时,JRP 为 100 年一遇。但是,如果考虑到它们之间的依赖性,则会降至 32.44 年一遇。忽略洪水驱动因素之间的依赖性会导致复合事件的联合风险恢复系数增加,从而导致低估整体洪水风险。我们的分析表明,造成复合事件的天气模式与热带气旋活动造成的仅极端风暴潮事件之间存在密切联系。此外,还发现仅有的极端降水事件与东亚夏季季风的锋面系统有关。这项研究强调了在评估沿海地区的洪水风险时,考虑与某些类型的相同天气系统相关的多 种洪水驱动因素之间的依赖关系的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the source and evolution of precipitation stable isotope composition across O‘ahu, Hawai‘i, USA Improving Subseasonal Soil Moisture and Evaporative Stress Index Forecasts through Machine Learning: The Role of Initial Land State versus Dynamical Model Output The Shrinking Great Salt Lake May Exacerbate Droughts by Reducing Local Precipitation: A Case Study In situ observations of rain rate and precipitation microphysics over the coastal area of South China: Perspectives for satellite validation Evaporation driven by Atmospheric Boundary Layer Processes over a Shallow Salt-Water Lagoon in the Altiplano
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1