Healthcare utilisation by diabetic patients in Denmark: the role of primary care in reducing emergency visits

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105079
Mauro Laudicella , Paolo Li Donni , Vincenzo Prete
{"title":"Healthcare utilisation by diabetic patients in Denmark: the role of primary care in reducing emergency visits","authors":"Mauro Laudicella ,&nbsp;Paolo Li Donni ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Prete","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Improving the management of diabetic patients is receiving increasing attention in the health policy agenda due to increasing prevalence in the population and raising pressure on healthcare resources. This paper examines the determinants of healthcare services utilisation in patients with type-2 diabetes, investigating the potential substitution effect of general practice visits on the utilisation of emergency department visits. By using rich longitudinal data from Denmark and a bivariate econometric model, our analysis highlights primary care services that are more effective in preventing emergency department visits and socioeconomic groups of patients with a weak substitution response. Our results suggest that empowering primary care services, such as preventive assessment visits, may contribute to reducing emergency department visits significantly. Moreover, special attention should be devoted to vulnerable groups, such as patients from low socioeconomic background and older patients, who may find more difficult achieving a large substitution response.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 105079"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024000897/pdfft?md5=751cf5c7dd69c048196164a03cd3350c&pid=1-s2.0-S0168851024000897-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024000897","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving the management of diabetic patients is receiving increasing attention in the health policy agenda due to increasing prevalence in the population and raising pressure on healthcare resources. This paper examines the determinants of healthcare services utilisation in patients with type-2 diabetes, investigating the potential substitution effect of general practice visits on the utilisation of emergency department visits. By using rich longitudinal data from Denmark and a bivariate econometric model, our analysis highlights primary care services that are more effective in preventing emergency department visits and socioeconomic groups of patients with a weak substitution response. Our results suggest that empowering primary care services, such as preventive assessment visits, may contribute to reducing emergency department visits significantly. Moreover, special attention should be devoted to vulnerable groups, such as patients from low socioeconomic background and older patients, who may find more difficult achieving a large substitution response.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦糖尿病患者的医疗保健使用情况:初级保健在减少急诊就诊方面的作用。
由于糖尿病在人口中的发病率越来越高,对医疗资源的压力也越来越大,因此改善糖尿病患者的管理越来越受到医疗政策议程的关注。本文探讨了 2 型糖尿病患者利用医疗服务的决定因素,研究了全科医生就诊对急诊就诊利用的潜在替代效应。通过使用丹麦丰富的纵向数据和双变量计量经济学模型,我们的分析突出了在预防急诊就诊方面更有效的初级医疗服务,以及替代反应较弱的社会经济患者群体。我们的研究结果表明,增强初级医疗服务(如预防性评估就诊)的能力可能有助于大幅减少急诊就诊率。此外,应特别关注弱势群体,如社会经济背景较差的患者和年龄较大的患者,他们可能更难获得较大的替代反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
期刊最新文献
How COVID-19 illness perceptions and individual shocks are associated with trust during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, France, Germany, and South Africa. Implementing integrated care infrastructure: A longitudinal study on the interplay of policies, interorganizational arrangements and interoperability in NHS England. Public contributions to R&D of medical innovations: A framework for analysis. What mechanisms lead to the endurance of health and social care integration? A multiple case study in Italy. The right to health for socioeconomically disadvantaged TB patients in South Korea: An AAAQ framework analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1