{"title":"Applying a Motivational Instructional Design Model to Stroke Rehabilitation: A Feasibility Study on Occupational and Swallowing Therapies","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the feasibility of poststroke interventions using a motivational instructional design model with occupational therapy (OT) and swallowing therapy (ST) and the model's potential physical and mental health effects.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>An open-label, single-arm, feasibility study on the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction model.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Two convalescent rehabilitation wards.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twenty-five patients with stroke (N=25) (19 men; mean age, 62.4±11.9y; 61.9±36.8d from the first stroke) were recruited.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Twelve participants received a motivational approach based on the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction model during OT (OT group), and 13 received it during ST (ST group). The intervention lasted 40-60 minutes daily, 5 days weekly, for 4 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The primary outcomes included the dropout rate, an adverse event, and the participants’ acceptability of the intervention. Paretic arm function was assessed in the OT group; swallowing ability was assessed in the ST group; and activities of daily living, depressive symptoms, and apathy were assessed in both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No participants dropped out of the intervention or experienced an adverse event. Twenty-one participants (84%) were satisfied with the intervention, and 19 (76%) hoped to continue receiving it. The OT group showed statistically significant improvements in paretic arm function and activities of daily living (Cohen's <em>r</em>=0.68-0.77), whereas the ST group improved in swallowing ability, activities of daily living, and depressive symptoms (Cohen's <em>r</em>=0.62-0.85).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The interventions using the motivational instructional model with OT and ST were feasible and could improve poststroke paretic arm function, swallowing ability, and activities of daily living after stroke.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259010952400034X/pdfft?md5=f9644f729d605623ce86b7d6f3667b03&pid=1-s2.0-S259010952400034X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259010952400034X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the feasibility of poststroke interventions using a motivational instructional design model with occupational therapy (OT) and swallowing therapy (ST) and the model's potential physical and mental health effects.
Design
An open-label, single-arm, feasibility study on the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction model.
Setting
Two convalescent rehabilitation wards.
Participants
Twenty-five patients with stroke (N=25) (19 men; mean age, 62.4±11.9y; 61.9±36.8d from the first stroke) were recruited.
Interventions
Twelve participants received a motivational approach based on the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction model during OT (OT group), and 13 received it during ST (ST group). The intervention lasted 40-60 minutes daily, 5 days weekly, for 4 weeks.
Main Outcome Measures
The primary outcomes included the dropout rate, an adverse event, and the participants’ acceptability of the intervention. Paretic arm function was assessed in the OT group; swallowing ability was assessed in the ST group; and activities of daily living, depressive symptoms, and apathy were assessed in both groups.
Results
No participants dropped out of the intervention or experienced an adverse event. Twenty-one participants (84%) were satisfied with the intervention, and 19 (76%) hoped to continue receiving it. The OT group showed statistically significant improvements in paretic arm function and activities of daily living (Cohen's r=0.68-0.77), whereas the ST group improved in swallowing ability, activities of daily living, and depressive symptoms (Cohen's r=0.62-0.85).
Conclusions
The interventions using the motivational instructional model with OT and ST were feasible and could improve poststroke paretic arm function, swallowing ability, and activities of daily living after stroke.
摘要]目的研究脑卒中后使用职业治疗(OT)和吞咽治疗(ST)的动机教学设计模式进行干预的可行性,以及该模式对身心健康的潜在影响。干预12名参与者在OT(OT组)期间接受了基于注意力、相关性、信心和满意度模型的激励方法,13名参与者在ST(ST组)期间接受了基于注意力、相关性、信心和满意度模型的激励方法。主要结果测量主要结果包括辍学率、不良事件和参与者对干预的接受程度。在 OT 组中评估瘫痪手臂的功能;在 ST 组中评估吞咽能力;在两组中评估日常生活活动、抑郁症状和冷漠。21名参与者(84%)对干预表示满意,19名参与者(76%)希望继续接受干预。OT组在瘫痪手臂功能和日常生活活动方面有显著改善(Cohen's r=0.68-0.77),而ST组在吞咽能力、日常生活活动和抑郁症状方面有显著改善(Cohen's r=0.62-0.85)。