Effectiveness and economic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a new surgical shear with an integrated energy system: A retrospective study based on a tertiary hospital database in China

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Asian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajur.2023.08.010
{"title":"Effectiveness and economic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a new surgical shear with an integrated energy system: A retrospective study based on a tertiary hospital database in China","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajur.2023.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to demonstrate a new surgical shear with an integrated energy system (Harmonic ACE®+7) value by determining its effectiveness and economic outcomes compared with conventional ultrasonic shears (CUSs) in a real-world setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective study of adults with prostate cancer undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the ACE®+7 shear or CUSs between August 2019 and April 2021 at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital (the headquarters and Luwan Center in China). Demographic and diagnosis information, intraoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes, and total and categorical costs were collected. Propensity score matching was performed to form the study population for each clinical group. Data were compared between the two groups using <em>t</em>-test and Chi-squared test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ACE®+7 was associated with a lower mean number of hemostatic clips used per surgery compared with CUSs (12.8 <em>vs.</em> 19.8, <em>p</em>&lt;0.001), a moderate but not significant difference in mean postoperative drainage duration (6.6 [standard deviation, SD 2.2] days <em>vs.</em> 7.9 [SD 4.1] days, <em>p</em>=0.082), a reduction on mean total drainage volume (275.5 [SD 374.3 mL <em>vs.</em> 492.9 [SD 1495.0] mL, <em>p</em>=0.321), and a lower mean rate of postoperative hemostatic drug usage (16.0% <em>vs.</em> 52.0%, <em>p</em>&lt;0.001). There was no significant difference in total costs between the ACE®+7 and CUS groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provides real-world data demonstrating that the ACE®+7 shear with an integrated energy system improves clinical outcomes compared with CUSs and can offer cost savings for hospitals and health systems. Using the ACE®+7 during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy allows physicians to help their patients achieve better outcomes and not spend additional money.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46599,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Urology","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 563-568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388224000547","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to demonstrate a new surgical shear with an integrated energy system (Harmonic ACE®+7) value by determining its effectiveness and economic outcomes compared with conventional ultrasonic shears (CUSs) in a real-world setting.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of adults with prostate cancer undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the ACE®+7 shear or CUSs between August 2019 and April 2021 at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital (the headquarters and Luwan Center in China). Demographic and diagnosis information, intraoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes, and total and categorical costs were collected. Propensity score matching was performed to form the study population for each clinical group. Data were compared between the two groups using t-test and Chi-squared test.

Results

The ACE®+7 was associated with a lower mean number of hemostatic clips used per surgery compared with CUSs (12.8 vs. 19.8, p<0.001), a moderate but not significant difference in mean postoperative drainage duration (6.6 [standard deviation, SD 2.2] days vs. 7.9 [SD 4.1] days, p=0.082), a reduction on mean total drainage volume (275.5 [SD 374.3 mL vs. 492.9 [SD 1495.0] mL, p=0.321), and a lower mean rate of postoperative hemostatic drug usage (16.0% vs. 52.0%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in total costs between the ACE®+7 and CUS groups.

Conclusion

This study provides real-world data demonstrating that the ACE®+7 shear with an integrated energy system improves clinical outcomes compared with CUSs and can offer cost savings for hospitals and health systems. Using the ACE®+7 during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy allows physicians to help their patients achieve better outcomes and not spend additional money.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用新型综合能量系统手术剪对腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者的疗效和经济效益:基于中国一家三级医院数据库的回顾性研究
方法这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是2019年8月至2021年4月期间在上海瑞金医院(中国总部和卢湾中心)接受腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术并使用ACE®+7剪或CUS的成人前列腺癌患者。收集了人口统计学和诊断信息、术中和术后临床结果、总费用和分类费用。对每个临床组的研究人群进行倾向评分匹配。结果 ACE®+7 与 CUSs 相比,每次手术使用的止血夹平均数量较少(12.8 对 19.8,p<0.001),术后平均引流时间差异不大(6.6 [标准差,SD 2.2] 天 vs. 7.9 [SD 4.1] 天,p=0.082),平均总引流容量减少(275.5 [SD 374.3 mL vs. 492.9 [SD 1495.0] mL,p=0.321),术后止血药平均使用率降低(16.0% vs. 52.0%,p<0.001)。结论本研究提供的实际数据表明,与 CUS 相比,带有集成能源系统的 ACE®+7 剪切术可改善临床疗效,并为医院和医疗系统节约成本。在腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中使用 ACE®+7 可以让医生帮助患者获得更好的治疗效果,而无需花费额外的金钱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Urology
Asian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Urology (AJUR), launched in October 2014, is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal jointly founded by Shanghai Association for Science and Technology (SAST) and Second Military Medical University (SMMU). AJUR aims to build a communication platform for international researchers to effectively share scholarly achievements. It focuses on all specialties of urology both scientifically and clinically, with article types widely covering editorials, opinions, perspectives, reviews and mini-reviews, original articles, cases reports, rapid communications, and letters, etc. Fields of particular interest to the journal including, but not limited to: • Surgical oncology • Endourology • Calculi • Female urology • Erectile dysfunction • Infertility • Pediatric urology • Renal transplantation • Reconstructive surgery • Radiology • Pathology • Neurourology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Is fluoroscopy-free single-use flexible ureteroscopy a feasible treatment for kidney stones with abnormal renal anatomy? Genitourinary toxicity after pelvic radiation: Prospective review of complex urological presentations Anillin actin-binding protein expression correlates with poor prognosis for prostate cancer patients Hyper accuracy three-dimensional virtual anatomical rainbow model facilitates surgical planning and safe selective clamping during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1