Harm Reduction Behavioral Activation Teletherapy for People Who Inject Drugs: Development, Feasibility, and Acceptability

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Cognitive and Behavioral Practice Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1016/j.cbpra.2024.03.002
Catherine E. Paquette, Alexander Vierling, Louisa Kane, Zachary Stewart, Loftin Wilson, Flavio Frohlich, Donald Baucom, Stacey B. Daughters
{"title":"Harm Reduction Behavioral Activation Teletherapy for People Who Inject Drugs: Development, Feasibility, and Acceptability","authors":"Catherine E. Paquette,&nbsp;Alexander Vierling,&nbsp;Louisa Kane,&nbsp;Zachary Stewart,&nbsp;Loftin Wilson,&nbsp;Flavio Frohlich,&nbsp;Donald Baucom,&nbsp;Stacey B. Daughters","doi":"10.1016/j.cbpra.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People who inject drugs (PWID) experience severe substance-related harms and yet have low rates of engagement in substance use disorder treatment. Low-barrier and telepsychology interventions represent promising strategies for engaging PWID in treatment, but few studies have tested the feasibility of these approaches among non-treatment-seeking PWID. A behavioral activation (BA) treatment for substance use was adapted through a harm reduction lens to assist PWID in working toward healthy, meaningful lives and achieving their goals. This study aims to: (a) describe the development and harm reduction–focused adaptation of the BA intervention, and (b) examine the feasibility and acceptability of administering a telepsychology BA treatment for substance use among non-treatment-seeking PWID. We recruited <em>N</em> = 23 PWID (65.2% White; 52.2% women; mean age 35.4 ± 7.8 years) from syringe services programs into an open trial and <em>n</em> = 19 received up to eight sessions of BA over 4 weeks. Qualitative treatment feedback interviews occurred at posttreatment. Among those who attended ≥1 session of treatment, 84% attended a second assessment, and 58% attended ≥7 intervention sessions. Feasibility challenges were primarily related to participant vulnerabilities (e.g., hospitalization, incarceration, loss of access to technology). Participants indicated high acceptance of the intervention and its telepsychology format. In conclusion, while PWID face significant barriers to engaging in treatment, some also demonstrate a desire, willingness, and capacity for psychological intervention. Remote interventions may help increase feasibility of treatment participation. Future studies should examine longer harm reduction-focused treatments for PWID that balance barriers to initial engagement with the need to reinforce treatment gains and improve long-term outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51511,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 457-473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107772292400049X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People who inject drugs (PWID) experience severe substance-related harms and yet have low rates of engagement in substance use disorder treatment. Low-barrier and telepsychology interventions represent promising strategies for engaging PWID in treatment, but few studies have tested the feasibility of these approaches among non-treatment-seeking PWID. A behavioral activation (BA) treatment for substance use was adapted through a harm reduction lens to assist PWID in working toward healthy, meaningful lives and achieving their goals. This study aims to: (a) describe the development and harm reduction–focused adaptation of the BA intervention, and (b) examine the feasibility and acceptability of administering a telepsychology BA treatment for substance use among non-treatment-seeking PWID. We recruited N = 23 PWID (65.2% White; 52.2% women; mean age 35.4 ± 7.8 years) from syringe services programs into an open trial and n = 19 received up to eight sessions of BA over 4 weeks. Qualitative treatment feedback interviews occurred at posttreatment. Among those who attended ≥1 session of treatment, 84% attended a second assessment, and 58% attended ≥7 intervention sessions. Feasibility challenges were primarily related to participant vulnerabilities (e.g., hospitalization, incarceration, loss of access to technology). Participants indicated high acceptance of the intervention and its telepsychology format. In conclusion, while PWID face significant barriers to engaging in treatment, some also demonstrate a desire, willingness, and capacity for psychological intervention. Remote interventions may help increase feasibility of treatment participation. Future studies should examine longer harm reduction-focused treatments for PWID that balance barriers to initial engagement with the need to reinforce treatment gains and improve long-term outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对注射毒品者的减低伤害行为激活远程疗法:开发、可行性和可接受性
注射吸毒者(PWID)经历了严重的物质相关伤害,但参与物质使用障碍治疗的比例很低。低障碍和远程心理干预是让PWID参与治疗的有希望的策略,但很少有研究测试这些方法在非寻求治疗的PWID中的可行性。通过减少伤害的视角,对药物使用的行为激活(BA)治疗进行了调整,以帮助PWID朝着健康、有意义的生活和实现他们的目标努力。本研究旨在:(a)描述BA干预的发展和以减少伤害为重点的适应,以及(b)检查在不寻求治疗的PWID中实施远程心理学BA治疗的可行性和可接受性。我们从注射器服务项目中招募了N = 23名PWID患者(白人占65.2%,女性占52.2%,平均年龄35.4±7.8岁)进入公开试验,N = 19名患者在4周内接受了8次BA治疗。定性治疗反馈访谈在治疗后进行。在参加≥1次治疗的患者中,84%参加了第二次评估,58%参加了≥7次干预。可行性方面的挑战主要与参与者的脆弱性有关(例如,住院、监禁、无法获得技术)。参与者对干预及其远程心理学形式表示高度接受。综上所述,尽管PWID患者在接受治疗方面面临着巨大的障碍,但一些人也表现出了心理干预的愿望、意愿和能力。远程干预可能有助于提高治疗参与的可行性。未来的研究应该检查长期的以减少危害为重点的PWID治疗方法,以平衡最初参与的障碍与加强治疗收益和改善长期结果的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: Cognitive and Behavioral Practice is a quarterly international journal that serves an enduring resource for empirically informed methods of clinical practice. Its mission is to bridge the gap between published research and the actual clinical practice of cognitive behavior therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice publishes clinically rich accounts of innovative assessment and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that are clearly grounded in empirical research. A focus on application and implementation of procedures is maintained.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Narrative Exposure Therapy for a Traumatic Birth Experience With the Non-Birthing Parent: A Single Case Study Disorders in Disguise: Proposed Clinical Competencies in Eating Disorders for All Child and Adolescent Mental Health Providers Feasibility, Safety, and Acceptability of Cognitive Processing Therapy for PTSD Following a Recent Suicide Attempt: A Case Study Mapping Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills to Clinical Domains Implicated in Contemporary Addiction Research: A Conceptual Synthesis and Promise for Precision Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1