Analytical and clinical validation of a novel, laboratory-developed, modular multiplex-PCR panel for fully automated high-throughput detection of 16 respiratory viruses

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY Journal of Clinical Virology Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105693
Hui Ting Tang , Dominik Nörz , Moritz Grunwald, Katja Giersch, Susanne Pfefferle, Nicole Fischer, Martin Aepfelbacher, Holger Rohde, Marc Lütgehetmann
{"title":"Analytical and clinical validation of a novel, laboratory-developed, modular multiplex-PCR panel for fully automated high-throughput detection of 16 respiratory viruses","authors":"Hui Ting Tang ,&nbsp;Dominik Nörz ,&nbsp;Moritz Grunwald,&nbsp;Katja Giersch,&nbsp;Susanne Pfefferle,&nbsp;Nicole Fischer,&nbsp;Martin Aepfelbacher,&nbsp;Holger Rohde,&nbsp;Marc Lütgehetmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><strong>:</strong> Viral respiratory Infections pose a health risk, especially to vulnerable patient populations. Effective testing programs can detect and differentiate these infections at an early stage, which is particularly important for high-risk clinical departments. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a multiplex PCR-panel for 16 different respiratory viruses on a fully-automated high-throughput platform.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three multiplex-PCR assays were designed to run on the cobas5800/6800/8800 systems, consolidating 16 viral targets: RESP1: SARS-CoV-2, influenza-A/B, RSV; RESP2: hMPV, hBoV, hAdV, rhino-/ENV; RESP3: HPIV-1–4, hCoV-229E, hCoV-NL63, hCoV-OC43, hCoV-HKU1. Analytic performance was evaluated using digital-PCR based standards and international reference material. Clinical performance was determined by comparing results from clinical samples with reference assays.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Analytical sensitivity (i.e. lower limit of detection (LoD), 95 % probability of detection) was determined as follows: SARS-CoV-2: 29.3 IU/ml, influenza-A: 179.9 cp/ml, influenza-B: 333.9 cp/ml and RSV: 283.1 cp/ml. LoDs of other pathogens ranged between 9.4 cp/ml (hCoV-NL63) and 21,419 cp/ml (HPIV-2). Linearity was verified over 4–7 log-steps with pooled standard differentials (SD) ranging between 0.18–0.70ct. Inter-/intra-run variability (precision) was assessed for all targets over 3 days. SDs ranged between 0.13–0.74ct. Positive agreement in clinical samples was 99.4 % and 95 % for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza-A respectively. Other targets were in the 80–100 % range. Negative agreement varied between 96.3–100 %.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Lab-developed tests are a key factor for effective clinical diagnostics. The multiplex panel presented in this study demonstrated high performance and provides an easily scalable high-throughput solution for respiratory virus testing, e.g. for testing in high-risk patient populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 105693"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653224000556/pdfft?md5=6da38b25c92dba819b4157dad492192a&pid=1-s2.0-S1386653224000556-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653224000556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

: Viral respiratory Infections pose a health risk, especially to vulnerable patient populations. Effective testing programs can detect and differentiate these infections at an early stage, which is particularly important for high-risk clinical departments. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a multiplex PCR-panel for 16 different respiratory viruses on a fully-automated high-throughput platform.

Methods

Three multiplex-PCR assays were designed to run on the cobas5800/6800/8800 systems, consolidating 16 viral targets: RESP1: SARS-CoV-2, influenza-A/B, RSV; RESP2: hMPV, hBoV, hAdV, rhino-/ENV; RESP3: HPIV-1–4, hCoV-229E, hCoV-NL63, hCoV-OC43, hCoV-HKU1. Analytic performance was evaluated using digital-PCR based standards and international reference material. Clinical performance was determined by comparing results from clinical samples with reference assays.

Results

Analytical sensitivity (i.e. lower limit of detection (LoD), 95 % probability of detection) was determined as follows: SARS-CoV-2: 29.3 IU/ml, influenza-A: 179.9 cp/ml, influenza-B: 333.9 cp/ml and RSV: 283.1 cp/ml. LoDs of other pathogens ranged between 9.4 cp/ml (hCoV-NL63) and 21,419 cp/ml (HPIV-2). Linearity was verified over 4–7 log-steps with pooled standard differentials (SD) ranging between 0.18–0.70ct. Inter-/intra-run variability (precision) was assessed for all targets over 3 days. SDs ranged between 0.13–0.74ct. Positive agreement in clinical samples was 99.4 % and 95 % for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza-A respectively. Other targets were in the 80–100 % range. Negative agreement varied between 96.3–100 %.

Discussion

Lab-developed tests are a key factor for effective clinical diagnostics. The multiplex panel presented in this study demonstrated high performance and provides an easily scalable high-throughput solution for respiratory virus testing, e.g. for testing in high-risk patient populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析和临床验证实验室开发的新型模块化多重 PCR 面板,用于全自动高通量检测 16 种呼吸道病毒。
背景:病毒性呼吸道感染对健康构成威胁,尤其是对易感人群。有效的检测计划可以在早期阶段检测和区分这些感染,这对高风险的临床科室尤为重要。本研究的目的是在全自动高通量平台上开发并验证针对 16 种不同呼吸道病毒的多重 PCR 检测板。方法设计了三种多重 PCR 检测方法,在 cobas5800/6800/8800 系统上运行,整合了 16 种病毒靶标:RESP1:SARS-CoV-2、流感-A/B、RSV;RESP2:hMPV、hBoV、hAdV、rhino-/ENV;RESP3:HPIV-1-4、hCoV-229E、hCoV-NL63、hCoV-OC43、hCoV-HKU1。使用基于数字 PCR 的标准和国际参考材料对分析性能进行了评估。分析灵敏度(即检测下限(LoD),95% 的检测概率)确定如下:SARS-CoV-2:29.3 IU/ml,A 型流感:179.9 cp/ml,B 型流感:333.9 cp/ml,RSV:283.1 cp/ml。其他病原体的 LoD 在 9.4 cp/ml (hCoV-NL63)和 21,419 cp/ml (HPIV-2)之间。线性度在 4-7 个对数级之间得到验证,集合标准差 (SD) 在 0.18-0.70ct 之间。在 3 天内对所有目标物的运行间/运行内变异性(精确度)进行了评估。标准差在 0.13-0.74ct 之间。在临床样本中,SARS-CoV-2 和甲型流感的阳性一致率分别为 99.4 % 和 95 %。其他目标在 80%-100% 之间。实验室开发的检测方法是有效临床诊断的关键因素。本研究中展示的多重检测板表现出很高的性能,为呼吸道病毒检测提供了一种易于扩展的高通量解决方案,例如用于高危患者人群的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Virology
Journal of Clinical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
1.10%
发文量
149
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice. The journal publishes on topics that include: • new diagnostic technologies • nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing • targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing • emerging pandemic viral threats • respiratory viruses • transplant viruses • chronic viral infections • cancer-associated viruses • gastrointestinal viruses • central nervous system viruses • one health (excludes animal health)
期刊最新文献
Nucleic acid amplification testing using dried blood spots to confirm the diagnosis of HIV-1 in adults. Quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) viral load in plasma: Comparison of three commercial assays. Coinfections and iterative detection of respiratory viruses among 17,689 patients between March 2021 and December 2022 in Southern France Performance evaluation of the Abbott Alinity Hepatitis C antigen next assay in a US urban emergency department population Standardization and evaluation of an in-house ELISA for the detection of rabies antibody in a tertiary care centre in South India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1