Interview with Nicos Poulantzas (April 1979)

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY SOUNDINGS Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3898/soun.86.04.2024
N. Poulantzas, Stuart Hall, Alan Hunt, Dave Featherstone, Lazaros Karaliotas
{"title":"Interview with Nicos Poulantzas (April 1979)","authors":"N. Poulantzas, Stuart Hall, Alan Hunt, Dave Featherstone, Lazaros Karaliotas","doi":"10.3898/soun.86.04.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nicos Poulantzas talks to Stuart Hall and Alan Hunt New introduction by Dave Featherstone and Lazaros Karaliotas Nicos Poulantzas was one of the most influential figures in the renewal in European Marxism in the 1970s, and this interview shows some of the ways in which left\n political discourse in Europe in the 1970s was shaped by widely shared trajectories and contexts. Poulantzas was a member of the Greek Communist Party of the Interior, which, like other parties moving towards a Eurocommunist position, had sought to articulate an alternative political strategy,\n a different democratic imaginary, and a different road to power. Poulantzas makes a crucial distinction between right and left variants of Eurocommunism. The discussion of Poulantzas’s ideas on ‘authoritarian statism’ situate the interview within wider discussions and debates\n during the 1970s about how to theorise and make sense of the relations between authoritarianism and the state; it is also part of a broader engagement with Poulantzas’s work that was central to Stuart Hall’s articulation of the concept of ‘authoritarian populism’, which\n he used to signi ficant effect in his critical analysis of Thatcherism. In the concluding discussion Poulantzas is clearly straining against some of the limits of left organising ‐ in relation to discussions of feminism, the ‘ecological movement’ and other social movements.\n But he also is clear that there will be no return to the certainties of a Leninist party model: ‘these are the problems which we must tackle; they will not go away, nor can we simply retreat to the old orthodoxy’. This effort to re-imagine the role of the centralising party while\n also embracing a plurality of ‘autonomous social movements’ was an important unifying concern within some variants of Eurocommunism.","PeriodicalId":45378,"journal":{"name":"SOUNDINGS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUNDINGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.86.04.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nicos Poulantzas talks to Stuart Hall and Alan Hunt New introduction by Dave Featherstone and Lazaros Karaliotas Nicos Poulantzas was one of the most influential figures in the renewal in European Marxism in the 1970s, and this interview shows some of the ways in which left political discourse in Europe in the 1970s was shaped by widely shared trajectories and contexts. Poulantzas was a member of the Greek Communist Party of the Interior, which, like other parties moving towards a Eurocommunist position, had sought to articulate an alternative political strategy, a different democratic imaginary, and a different road to power. Poulantzas makes a crucial distinction between right and left variants of Eurocommunism. The discussion of Poulantzas’s ideas on ‘authoritarian statism’ situate the interview within wider discussions and debates during the 1970s about how to theorise and make sense of the relations between authoritarianism and the state; it is also part of a broader engagement with Poulantzas’s work that was central to Stuart Hall’s articulation of the concept of ‘authoritarian populism’, which he used to signi ficant effect in his critical analysis of Thatcherism. In the concluding discussion Poulantzas is clearly straining against some of the limits of left organising ‐ in relation to discussions of feminism, the ‘ecological movement’ and other social movements. But he also is clear that there will be no return to the certainties of a Leninist party model: ‘these are the problems which we must tackle; they will not go away, nor can we simply retreat to the old orthodoxy’. This effort to re-imagine the role of the centralising party while also embracing a plurality of ‘autonomous social movements’ was an important unifying concern within some variants of Eurocommunism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采访尼科斯-普兰查斯(1979 年 4 月)
尼科斯-普兰查斯(Nicos Poulantzas)与斯图尔特-霍尔(Stuart Hall)和艾伦-亨特(Alan Hunt)对话 戴夫-费瑟斯通(Dave Featherstone)和拉扎罗斯-卡拉利奥塔斯(Lazaros Karaliotas)撰写的新导言 尼科斯-普兰查斯是 20 世纪 70 年代欧洲马克思主义复兴中最具影响力的人物之一,本访谈展示了 20 世纪 70 年代欧洲左翼政治话语是如何在广泛共享的轨迹和背景下形成的。普兰查斯是希腊内务部共产党的成员,该党与其他走向欧洲共同体立场的政党一样,试图阐明另一种政治战略、不同的民主想象和通向权力的不同道路。普兰查斯对欧洲共同体主义的右翼和左翼变体做出了重要区分。对普兰查斯 "专制国家主义 "思想的讨论,将该访谈置于 20 世纪 70 年代关于如何理论化和理解专制主义与国家之间关系的更广泛讨论和辩论之中;这也是对普兰查斯作品更广泛参与的一部分,而普兰查斯的作品对于斯图尔特-霍尔阐明 "专制民粹主义 "概念至关重要,霍尔在对撒切尔主义的批判性分析中使用了这一概念,并取得了显著效果。在最后的讨论中,普兰查斯显然对左翼组织的某些局限性--与女权主义、"生态运动 "和其他社会运动相关的讨论--感到了压力。但他也明确指出,列宁主义政党模式的确定性将一去不复返:这些都是我们必须解决的问题;它们不会消失,我们也不能简单地退回到旧的正统观念中"。欧洲共同体主义的一些变体在重新认识集权政党的作用的同时,也接纳了 "自治社会运动 "的多元性,这是它们共同关注的一个重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SOUNDINGS
SOUNDINGS HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Eurocommunism: when the past and present of the European left meet Emergency thinking Law and order: what can we expect from an incoming Labour government? Urban communist politics of the everyday in Graz, Austria Eurocommunism: The rise and fall of a hopeful project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1