Revisión sistemática y metanálisis de la mortalidad en la miocardiopatía chagásica crónica frente a otras miocardiopatías: ¿mayor riesgo o ficción?

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

Although multiple studies suggest that chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) has higher mortality than other cardiomyopathies, the absence of meta-analyses supporting this perspective limits the possibility of generating robust conclusions. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the current evidence on mortality risk in CCC compared with that of other cardiomyopathies.

Methods

PubMed/Medline and EMBASE were searched for studies comparing mortality risk between patients with CCC and those with other cardiomyopathies, including in the latter nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), ischemic cardiomyopathy, and non-Chagas cardiomyopathy (nonCC). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to combine the effects of the evaluated studies.

Results

A total of 37 studies evaluating 17 949 patients were included. Patients with CCC had a significantly higher mortality risk compared with patients with NICM (HR, 2.04; 95%CI, 1.60-2.60; I², 47%; 8 studies) and non-CC (HR, 2.26; 95%CI, 1.65-3.10; I², 71%; 11 studies), while no significant association was observed compared with patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (HR, 1.72; 95%CI, 0.80-3.66; I², 69%; 4 studies) in the adjusted-measures meta-analysis.

Conclusions

Patients with CCC have an almost 2-fold increased mortality risk compared with individuals with heart failure secondary to other etiologies. This finding highlights the need for effective public policies and targeted research initiatives to optimally address the challenges of CCC.

Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en