Colposacropexia robótica para el tratamiento del prolapso de órganos pélvicos en mujeres de edad avanzada: análisis comparativo de la seguridad y eficacia frente a mujeres jóvenes

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Actas urologicas espanolas Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acuro.2024.04.005
{"title":"Colposacropexia robótica para el tratamiento del prolapso de órganos pélvicos en mujeres de edad avanzada: análisis comparativo de la seguridad y eficacia frente a mujeres jóvenes","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pelvic organ prolapse is a condition with high prevalence in elderly women. With increasing life expectancy and a desire for improved quality of life, a rise in the frequency of surgical treatments for these women is anticipated. The aim is to compare complication, success, and satisfaction rates among elderly patients (aged<!--> <!-->&gt;70 years) in comparison to younger women undergoing robotic sacrocolpopexy, thereby assessing the safety and efficacy of this surgery in this group of patients.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A prospective observational comparative study of 123 robotic sacrocolpopexies conducted between December 2016 and June 2022. Patients were stratified by age (cutoff point: 70 years). Baseline characteristics, type, and grade of prolapse, intra and postoperative data, complications, functional and anatomical outcomes, and satisfaction levels were collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 123 patients, 62.6% were under 70 years old, while 37.4% were 70 years or older, exhibiting similar baseline characteristics, prolapse grade, and type. The percentages of intraoperative (6.5%) and postoperative complications (4.4-9%) were comparable in both age groups. Furthermore, success and satisfaction rates exceeded 90%, with no significant differences between women under and over 70 years during a two-year follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Robotic sacrocolpopexy is at least as effective and safe in women aged 70 years or older as in younger individuals, with no higher rates of intra and postoperative complications and similar rates of anatomical and subjective success.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 8","pages":"Pages 611-617"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480624000676","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Pelvic organ prolapse is a condition with high prevalence in elderly women. With increasing life expectancy and a desire for improved quality of life, a rise in the frequency of surgical treatments for these women is anticipated. The aim is to compare complication, success, and satisfaction rates among elderly patients (aged >70 years) in comparison to younger women undergoing robotic sacrocolpopexy, thereby assessing the safety and efficacy of this surgery in this group of patients.

Method

A prospective observational comparative study of 123 robotic sacrocolpopexies conducted between December 2016 and June 2022. Patients were stratified by age (cutoff point: 70 years). Baseline characteristics, type, and grade of prolapse, intra and postoperative data, complications, functional and anatomical outcomes, and satisfaction levels were collected.

Results

Among the 123 patients, 62.6% were under 70 years old, while 37.4% were 70 years or older, exhibiting similar baseline characteristics, prolapse grade, and type. The percentages of intraoperative (6.5%) and postoperative complications (4.4-9%) were comparable in both age groups. Furthermore, success and satisfaction rates exceeded 90%, with no significant differences between women under and over 70 years during a two-year follow-up.

Conclusion

Robotic sacrocolpopexy is at least as effective and safe in women aged 70 years or older as in younger individuals, with no higher rates of intra and postoperative complications and similar rates of anatomical and subjective success.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人阴道环切术治疗老年妇女盆腔器官脱垂:安全性和有效性与年轻妇女的比较分析
引言 盆腔脏器脱垂是老年妇女的高发病。随着预期寿命的延长和对提高生活质量的渴望,预计对这些妇女进行手术治疗的频率将会增加。本研究旨在比较老年患者(70 岁)与年轻女性接受机器人骶尾部结扎术的并发症发生率、成功率和满意度,从而评估该手术在这类患者中的安全性和有效性。患者按年龄分层(分界点:70 岁)。研究收集了患者的基线特征、脱垂类型和等级、术中和术后数据、并发症、功能和解剖结果以及满意度。两个年龄组的术中(6.5%)和术后并发症(4.4%-9%)发生率相当。此外,成功率和满意度均超过 90%,在为期两年的随访中,70 岁以下和 70 岁以上妇女的成功率和满意度无明显差异。结论机器人骶尾部结扎术对 70 岁或以上妇女的有效性和安全性至少与年轻人相同,术中和术后并发症发生率不高,解剖学成功率和主观成功率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Actas urologicas espanolas
Actas urologicas espanolas UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Actas Urológicas Españolas is an international journal dedicated to urological diseases and renal transplant. It has been the official publication of the Spanish Urology Association since 1974 and of the American Urology Confederation since 2008. Its articles cover all aspects related to urology. Actas Urológicas Españolas, governed by the peer review system (double blinded), is published online in Spanish and English. Consequently, manuscripts may be sent in Spanish or English and bidirectional free cost translation will be provided.
期刊最新文献
El leaking pipeline y las brechas de género en Urología Controversias en el abordaje del cáncer de próstata: consenso de recomendaciones de expertos del norte de España Hacia el cribado poblacional del cáncer de próstata en España Evaluación de los cambios en la función sexual en pacientes sometidos a cirugía endoscópica de la litiasis del tracto urinario superior Producción científica en urología: un análisis bibliométrico de 20 años en Latinoamérica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1