An evaluation of the validity and reliability of the tuberculosis patient knowledge questionnaire

Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.46542/pe.2024.243.173177
Syaripah Ulandari, Abdul Rahem, Y. Priyandani
{"title":"An evaluation of the validity and reliability of the tuberculosis patient knowledge questionnaire","authors":"Syaripah Ulandari, Abdul Rahem, Y. Priyandani","doi":"10.46542/pe.2024.243.173177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:  Poor knowledge of tuberculosis (TB) patients on tuberculosis affects adherence. It is necessary to measure patient awareness of the disease and treatment to assess the extent to which patients know about the disease and its treatment. A good questionnaire has been tested for validity and reliability. Currently, some studies need to show the validity process of the TB knowledge questionnaire directly.    \nObjective: To measure the validity and reliability of the tuberculosis patient knowledge questionnaire.\nMethod: Accidental sampling was used in the research approach. By comparing the corrected item-total item values, the construct validity and reliability of the final knowledge questionnaire were evaluated. Additionally, an internal consistency test with an alpha coefficient (Cronbach's Alpha) was used to assess the questionnaire’s reliability.\nResult: A total of 93 respondents were picked from different Bengkulu healthcare centers. The validity test results indicate the corrected item-total item > 0.30. According to the findings of the reliability test, Cronbach's alpha > 0.60 throughout.    \nConclusion: This study proves the validity and reliability of the knowledge questionnaire as a tool for measuring knowledge.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"18 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2024.243.173177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Poor knowledge of tuberculosis (TB) patients on tuberculosis affects adherence. It is necessary to measure patient awareness of the disease and treatment to assess the extent to which patients know about the disease and its treatment. A good questionnaire has been tested for validity and reliability. Currently, some studies need to show the validity process of the TB knowledge questionnaire directly.     Objective: To measure the validity and reliability of the tuberculosis patient knowledge questionnaire. Method: Accidental sampling was used in the research approach. By comparing the corrected item-total item values, the construct validity and reliability of the final knowledge questionnaire were evaluated. Additionally, an internal consistency test with an alpha coefficient (Cronbach's Alpha) was used to assess the questionnaire’s reliability. Result: A total of 93 respondents were picked from different Bengkulu healthcare centers. The validity test results indicate the corrected item-total item > 0.30. According to the findings of the reliability test, Cronbach's alpha > 0.60 throughout.     Conclusion: This study proves the validity and reliability of the knowledge questionnaire as a tool for measuring knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
结核病患者知识问卷的有效性和可靠性评估
背景: 结核病(TB)患者对结核病的认识不足会影响其坚持治疗。有必要测量患者对疾病和治疗的认识,以评估患者对疾病和治疗的了解程度。一份好的问卷已经过有效性和可靠性测试。目前,一些研究需要直接显示结核病知识问卷的有效性过程。 目的测量肺结核患者知识问卷的有效性和可靠性:研究方法:采用意外抽样法。通过比较校正后的项目-项目总值,评估最终知识问卷的建构效度和信度。此外,还使用α系数(克朗巴赫α)进行内部一致性测试,以评估问卷的可靠性:从不同的明古鲁医疗中心共抽取了 93 名受访者。效度测试结果表明,校正后的项目-总项目>0.30。根据信度测试的结果,Cronbach's alpha > 0.60。 结论本研究证明了知识问卷作为知识测量工具的有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1