Questioning Training and Critical Thinking of Undergraduate Students of Health and Social Sciences: A Scoping Review

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2024.04.010
{"title":"Questioning Training and Critical Thinking of Undergraduate Students of Health and Social Sciences: A Scoping Review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To explore and describe the evidence about questioning the training of undergraduate health and social sciences students and their critical thinking (CT). In addition, it identifies the gap to guide further research.</p></div><div><h3>Design and Review Method</h3><p>A scoping review was conducted by using the population, concept, and context framework.</p></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><p>Literature was searched in four databases which include the Education Resources Information Center, African Education Research Database, PubMed, and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Ten articles were included in this review after screening for the set criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most of the studies reported enhancement in CT dispositions and skills after implementing questioning strategies. Moreover, the level of questions changed from lower to higher after the intervention. However, the review found heterogeneity in discipline, intervention, tool, and time of measurement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The current evidence is inconclusive about the effect of questioning strategies on developing students’ CT. This highlights the need for additional empirical evidence by using a comprehensive strategy to promote CT in undergraduate students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"19 4","pages":"Pages e602-e609"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To explore and describe the evidence about questioning the training of undergraduate health and social sciences students and their critical thinking (CT). In addition, it identifies the gap to guide further research.

Design and Review Method

A scoping review was conducted by using the population, concept, and context framework.

Data Sources

Literature was searched in four databases which include the Education Resources Information Center, African Education Research Database, PubMed, and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Ten articles were included in this review after screening for the set criteria.

Results

Most of the studies reported enhancement in CT dispositions and skills after implementing questioning strategies. Moreover, the level of questions changed from lower to higher after the intervention. However, the review found heterogeneity in discipline, intervention, tool, and time of measurement.

Conclusion

The current evidence is inconclusive about the effect of questioning strategies on developing students’ CT. This highlights the need for additional empirical evidence by using a comprehensive strategy to promote CT in undergraduate students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康与社会科学本科生的质疑训练和批判性思维:范围审查
目的探索并描述有关质疑健康与社会科学本科生的培训及其批判性思维(CT)的证据。数据来源在四个数据库(包括教育资源信息中心、非洲教育研究数据库、PubMed 和护理与联合健康文献累积索引)中搜索文献。结果大多数研究报告称,在实施提问策略后,CT 的处置和技能得到了提高。此外,干预后提问水平由低变高。然而,综述发现在学科、干预、工具和测量时间方面存在异质性。结论目前的证据还不能确定提问策略对发展学生 CT 的效果。这凸显了通过使用综合策略来促进本科生 CT 的发展,从而获得更多实证证据的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
期刊最新文献
Perception of caring behaviors of faculty members from the perspective of nursing students The Urgency of Teaching Theory in the Current Nursing Education Landscape OADN's Milestone Anniversary: Celebrating 40 Years of Advocacy, Education, and Leadership Nurse Educators’ Perspectives in Facilitating Ethics Education: A Descriptive Qualitative Study Implementing Entrustable Professional Activities in a pre-licensure nursing program to facilitate competency-based education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1